化学杀菌剂与生物杀菌剂对土壤细菌群落影响的比较研究。

IF 6.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Setu Bazie Tagele, Emma W Gachomo
{"title":"化学杀菌剂与生物杀菌剂对土壤细菌群落影响的比较研究。","authors":"Setu Bazie Tagele, Emma W Gachomo","doi":"10.1186/s40793-025-00713-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soil microbial communities play key roles in agroecosystems, particularly in processes like organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling. However, human activities can negatively impact their community structure and, consequently, soil function. SoilGard and Ridomil are effective methods for controlling carrot cavity spots caused by Pythium spp., but their effects on bacterial taxonomic and metabolic function shifts are not well understood. This study aims to investigate the comparative impact of the chemical fungicide Ridomil and the biological fungicide SoilGard on the bacterial communities in soils cultivated with carrots. Our results showed that both SoilGard and Ridomil significantly impacted soil bacterial diversity, but their effects were distinct and time-dependent. Ridomil had an immediate negative effect on soil bacterial diversity two weeks after treatment, whereas SoilGard was initially less disruptive but showed delayed negative consequences 12 weeks after treatment, particularly when combined with Pythium inoculation. Ridomil treatment led to an increase in Proteobacteria, especially the Pseudomonas population, as confirmed by both MiSeq and qPCR data. In contrast, SoilGard depleted the Mycobacterium population at 12 weeks after treatment. Furthermore, the results of community-level physiological profiling using Biolog Ecoplates showed significant differences in substrate-level diversity between Ridomil and SoilGard-treated samples, indicating a shift in the metabolic activity of bacterial communities. Ridomil-treated samples showed the lowest metabolic activity of bacterial communities, based on the diversity and richness of carbon source utilization, compared to control. Overall, this research highlights the distinct and time-dependent effects of biological and chemical fungicides on soil bacterial communities when applied at recommended doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48553,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiome","volume":"20 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study: impact of chemical and biological fungicides on soil bacterial communities.\",\"authors\":\"Setu Bazie Tagele, Emma W Gachomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40793-025-00713-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Soil microbial communities play key roles in agroecosystems, particularly in processes like organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling. However, human activities can negatively impact their community structure and, consequently, soil function. SoilGard and Ridomil are effective methods for controlling carrot cavity spots caused by Pythium spp., but their effects on bacterial taxonomic and metabolic function shifts are not well understood. This study aims to investigate the comparative impact of the chemical fungicide Ridomil and the biological fungicide SoilGard on the bacterial communities in soils cultivated with carrots. Our results showed that both SoilGard and Ridomil significantly impacted soil bacterial diversity, but their effects were distinct and time-dependent. Ridomil had an immediate negative effect on soil bacterial diversity two weeks after treatment, whereas SoilGard was initially less disruptive but showed delayed negative consequences 12 weeks after treatment, particularly when combined with Pythium inoculation. Ridomil treatment led to an increase in Proteobacteria, especially the Pseudomonas population, as confirmed by both MiSeq and qPCR data. In contrast, SoilGard depleted the Mycobacterium population at 12 weeks after treatment. Furthermore, the results of community-level physiological profiling using Biolog Ecoplates showed significant differences in substrate-level diversity between Ridomil and SoilGard-treated samples, indicating a shift in the metabolic activity of bacterial communities. Ridomil-treated samples showed the lowest metabolic activity of bacterial communities, based on the diversity and richness of carbon source utilization, compared to control. Overall, this research highlights the distinct and time-dependent effects of biological and chemical fungicides on soil bacterial communities when applied at recommended doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Microbiome\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042651/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Microbiome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-025-00713-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-025-00713-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤微生物群落在农业生态系统中发挥着关键作用,特别是在有机物分解和养分循环等过程中。然而,人类活动会对其群落结构产生负面影响,从而影响土壤功能。SoilGard和Ridomil是防治萝卜蛀斑病的有效方法,但其对细菌分类和代谢功能变化的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较化学杀菌剂利多密和生物杀菌剂SoilGard对胡萝卜栽培土壤细菌群落的影响。结果表明,SoilGard和Ridomil对土壤细菌多样性均有显著影响,但影响程度不同且具有时间依赖性。利多密在处理两周后立即对土壤细菌多样性产生负面影响,而SoilGard最初的破坏性较小,但在处理12周后表现出延迟的负面影响,特别是与接种霉菌联合使用时。正如MiSeq和qPCR数据所证实的那样,利多米尔处理导致变形菌群,特别是假单胞菌群的增加。相比之下,SoilGard在治疗12周后减少了分枝杆菌的数量。此外,使用Biolog Ecoplates进行的群落水平生理分析结果显示,利多密和soilgard处理的样品在底物水平多样性上存在显著差异,这表明细菌群落的代谢活性发生了变化。基于碳源利用的多样性和丰富度,与对照相比,经利多米尔处理的样品显示出最低的细菌群落代谢活性。总的来说,这项研究强调了按推荐剂量施用生物和化学杀菌剂对土壤细菌群落的独特和时间依赖性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study: impact of chemical and biological fungicides on soil bacterial communities.

Soil microbial communities play key roles in agroecosystems, particularly in processes like organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling. However, human activities can negatively impact their community structure and, consequently, soil function. SoilGard and Ridomil are effective methods for controlling carrot cavity spots caused by Pythium spp., but their effects on bacterial taxonomic and metabolic function shifts are not well understood. This study aims to investigate the comparative impact of the chemical fungicide Ridomil and the biological fungicide SoilGard on the bacterial communities in soils cultivated with carrots. Our results showed that both SoilGard and Ridomil significantly impacted soil bacterial diversity, but their effects were distinct and time-dependent. Ridomil had an immediate negative effect on soil bacterial diversity two weeks after treatment, whereas SoilGard was initially less disruptive but showed delayed negative consequences 12 weeks after treatment, particularly when combined with Pythium inoculation. Ridomil treatment led to an increase in Proteobacteria, especially the Pseudomonas population, as confirmed by both MiSeq and qPCR data. In contrast, SoilGard depleted the Mycobacterium population at 12 weeks after treatment. Furthermore, the results of community-level physiological profiling using Biolog Ecoplates showed significant differences in substrate-level diversity between Ridomil and SoilGard-treated samples, indicating a shift in the metabolic activity of bacterial communities. Ridomil-treated samples showed the lowest metabolic activity of bacterial communities, based on the diversity and richness of carbon source utilization, compared to control. Overall, this research highlights the distinct and time-dependent effects of biological and chemical fungicides on soil bacterial communities when applied at recommended doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Microbiome
Environmental Microbiome Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Microorganisms, omnipresent across Earth's diverse environments, play a crucial role in adapting to external changes, influencing Earth's systems and cycles, and contributing significantly to agricultural practices. Through applied microbiology, they offer solutions to various everyday needs. Environmental Microbiome recognizes the universal presence and significance of microorganisms, inviting submissions that explore the diverse facets of environmental and applied microbiological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信