2型糖尿病患者的疼痛和满意度:注射胰岛素时咳嗽、注射阻断剂和震动的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.4103/npmj.npmj_55_25
Ali Dhahir Abdulyemmah, Haider Mohammed Majeed
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者的疼痛和满意度:注射胰岛素时咳嗽、注射阻断剂和震动的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Ali Dhahir Abdulyemmah, Haider Mohammed Majeed","doi":"10.4103/npmj.npmj_55_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a chronic illness that commonly leads to progressive and incapacitating of patients' condition over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of the coughing technique, ShotBlockerTo evaluate the effects of the coughing technique, ShotBlocker and vibration device on pain intensity and patient satisfaction during subcutaneous (SC) insulin injections in hospitalised adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>The study was conducted at the Imam Al-Hassan Al Mujtaba Teaching Hospital, Al-Imam Al-Hasan Teaching Hospital, Al-Hindia Teaching Hospital, and Imam Al-Hussein Medical City in Holy Karbala. A simple random sampling of adults with T2DM was assigned in the current study from the previously mentioned setting. One hundred and forty patients were classified into 4 groups, 35 patients in the ShotBlocker group, 36 patients in the Vibration group 38 patients in the coughing group and 31 patients in the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences in pain scores among the study groups (P = 0.000). The vibration group had significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000). Similarly, the ShotBlocker group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000), and the coughing group also exhibited significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000) compared to the control group. Regarding satisfaction scores, there were statistically significant differences among the groups (P = 0.000). The vibration group had significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.000). Similarly, the ShotBlocker group showed significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.000), and the coughing group had significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.004) compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The coughing technique, ShotBlocker and vibration device are effective, non-invasive methods for reducing pain and enhancing patient satisfaction during SC insulin injections in adults with T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19720,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":"32 2","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain and Satisfaction among Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Effects of Coughing, ShotBlocker and Vibration during Insulin Injection: A Randomised Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Dhahir Abdulyemmah, Haider Mohammed Majeed\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/npmj.npmj_55_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a chronic illness that commonly leads to progressive and incapacitating of patients' condition over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of the coughing technique, ShotBlockerTo evaluate the effects of the coughing technique, ShotBlocker and vibration device on pain intensity and patient satisfaction during subcutaneous (SC) insulin injections in hospitalised adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>The study was conducted at the Imam Al-Hassan Al Mujtaba Teaching Hospital, Al-Imam Al-Hasan Teaching Hospital, Al-Hindia Teaching Hospital, and Imam Al-Hussein Medical City in Holy Karbala. A simple random sampling of adults with T2DM was assigned in the current study from the previously mentioned setting. One hundred and forty patients were classified into 4 groups, 35 patients in the ShotBlocker group, 36 patients in the Vibration group 38 patients in the coughing group and 31 patients in the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences in pain scores among the study groups (P = 0.000). The vibration group had significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000). Similarly, the ShotBlocker group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000), and the coughing group also exhibited significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000) compared to the control group. Regarding satisfaction scores, there were statistically significant differences among the groups (P = 0.000). The vibration group had significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.000). Similarly, the ShotBlocker group showed significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.000), and the coughing group had significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.004) compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The coughing technique, ShotBlocker and vibration device are effective, non-invasive methods for reducing pain and enhancing patient satisfaction during SC insulin injections in adults with T2DM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"97-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_55_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_55_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病是一种慢性疾病,在过去的20年里通常导致患者病情的进展和丧失能力。目的:本研究的目的是评估咳嗽技术、ShotBlocker和振动装置对住院2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者皮下注射胰岛素时疼痛强度和患者满意度的影响。研究对象和方法:研究在神圣卡尔巴拉的伊玛目哈桑穆杰塔巴教学医院、伊玛目哈桑教学医院、欣迪亚教学医院和伊玛目侯赛因医疗城进行。在目前的研究中,从前面提到的环境中随机抽取了2型糖尿病成人患者。140例患者分为4组,ShotBlocker组35例,Vibration组36例,咳嗽组38例,对照组31例。结果:各研究组疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。振动组疼痛评分明显低于振动组(P = 0.000)。同样,ShotBlocker组的疼痛评分明显低于对照组(P = 0.000),咳嗽组的疼痛评分也明显低于对照组(P = 0.000)。在满意度得分方面,组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。振动组满意度得分显著高于振动组(P = 0.000)。同样,ShotBlocker组满意度得分显著高于对照组(P = 0.000),咳嗽组满意度得分显著高于对照组(P = 0.004)。结论:咳嗽技术、ShotBlocker和振动装置是有效的、非侵入性的方法,可以减轻成人T2DM患者SC胰岛素注射过程中的疼痛,提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain and Satisfaction among Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Effects of Coughing, ShotBlocker and Vibration during Insulin Injection: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic illness that commonly leads to progressive and incapacitating of patients' condition over the past 20 years.

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of the coughing technique, ShotBlockerTo evaluate the effects of the coughing technique, ShotBlocker and vibration device on pain intensity and patient satisfaction during subcutaneous (SC) insulin injections in hospitalised adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Subjects and methods: The study was conducted at the Imam Al-Hassan Al Mujtaba Teaching Hospital, Al-Imam Al-Hasan Teaching Hospital, Al-Hindia Teaching Hospital, and Imam Al-Hussein Medical City in Holy Karbala. A simple random sampling of adults with T2DM was assigned in the current study from the previously mentioned setting. One hundred and forty patients were classified into 4 groups, 35 patients in the ShotBlocker group, 36 patients in the Vibration group 38 patients in the coughing group and 31 patients in the control group.

Results: There were statistically significant differences in pain scores among the study groups (P = 0.000). The vibration group had significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000). Similarly, the ShotBlocker group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000), and the coughing group also exhibited significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.000) compared to the control group. Regarding satisfaction scores, there were statistically significant differences among the groups (P = 0.000). The vibration group had significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.000). Similarly, the ShotBlocker group showed significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.000), and the coughing group had significantly higher satisfaction scores (P = 0.004) compared to the control group.

Conclusions: The coughing technique, ShotBlocker and vibration device are effective, non-invasive methods for reducing pain and enhancing patient satisfaction during SC insulin injections in adults with T2DM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信