运动和肌肉能量技术对老年膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效:一项双盲随机对照试验。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Dwi Rosella Komalasari, Mantana Vongsirinavarat, Patcharin Nilmart
{"title":"运动和肌肉能量技术对老年膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效:一项双盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Dwi Rosella Komalasari, Mantana Vongsirinavarat, Patcharin Nilmart","doi":"10.1177/10538127251328541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundManaging knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) effectively often requires a multifaceted approach that includes various manual therapy techniques to reduce pain and improve joint function in the elderly. The effectiveness of manipulation with movement (MWM) and muscle energy technique (MET) is still unclear.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of MWM and MET in the elderly with KOA over time.MethodsA double-blind randomized control trial was conducted in the rehabilitation division of Surakarta Hospital, Indonesia, with 54 participants randomized into two groups. The effects of MWM and MET on pain (Numeric Rating Scale), knee range of motion, static and dynamic balance, lower limb muscle strength, and fear of falling (FoF) were observed after 4 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks of follow-up. Repeated-measures ANOVA compared mean outcomes over time between the groups, and a t-test compared mean differences between groups.ResultsThere was no mean difference in baseline between groups. MET and MWM showed a significant effect of time on all outcome measures (p < 0.05). MWM revealed higher knee flexion (<i>p </i>< 0.001), TUG (<i>p </i>= 0.010) and FoF (<i>p </i>= 0.008) after 4 weeks (p < 0.05). The follow-up resulted in significant differences between groups, knee flexion, TUG and one leg stance (OLS) on the left side and open eyes were higher in the MWM group.ConclusionsBoth MWM and MET were effective treatment strategies in managing KOA. MWM had a greater effect on improving knee flexion movement, dynamic balance and FoF than MET. OLS with open eyes was observed stable in follow-up observation in the MWM group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251328541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of manipulation with movement and muscle energy technique in elderly with knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind randomized control trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dwi Rosella Komalasari, Mantana Vongsirinavarat, Patcharin Nilmart\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251328541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundManaging knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) effectively often requires a multifaceted approach that includes various manual therapy techniques to reduce pain and improve joint function in the elderly. The effectiveness of manipulation with movement (MWM) and muscle energy technique (MET) is still unclear.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of MWM and MET in the elderly with KOA over time.MethodsA double-blind randomized control trial was conducted in the rehabilitation division of Surakarta Hospital, Indonesia, with 54 participants randomized into two groups. The effects of MWM and MET on pain (Numeric Rating Scale), knee range of motion, static and dynamic balance, lower limb muscle strength, and fear of falling (FoF) were observed after 4 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks of follow-up. Repeated-measures ANOVA compared mean outcomes over time between the groups, and a t-test compared mean differences between groups.ResultsThere was no mean difference in baseline between groups. MET and MWM showed a significant effect of time on all outcome measures (p < 0.05). MWM revealed higher knee flexion (<i>p </i>< 0.001), TUG (<i>p </i>= 0.010) and FoF (<i>p </i>= 0.008) after 4 weeks (p < 0.05). The follow-up resulted in significant differences between groups, knee flexion, TUG and one leg stance (OLS) on the left side and open eyes were higher in the MWM group.ConclusionsBoth MWM and MET were effective treatment strategies in managing KOA. MWM had a greater effect on improving knee flexion movement, dynamic balance and FoF than MET. OLS with open eyes was observed stable in follow-up observation in the MWM group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251328541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251328541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251328541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有效治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)通常需要多方面的方法,包括各种手工治疗技术,以减轻老年人的疼痛和改善关节功能。运动操纵(MWM)和肌肉能量技术(MET)的有效性尚不清楚。目的比较MWM和MET治疗老年KOA的临床疗效。方法在印尼泗水医院康复科进行双盲随机对照试验,54例患者随机分为两组。治疗4周和随访2周后,观察MWM和MET对疼痛(数值评定量表)、膝关节活动度、静态和动态平衡、下肢肌力和跌倒恐惧(FoF)的影响。重复测量方差分析比较各组间随时间的平均结果,t检验比较各组间的平均差异。结果两组间基线值无平均差异。MET和MWM在4周后对所有结果测量值(p = 0.010)和FoF (p = 0.008)均有显著影响(p = 0.010)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of manipulation with movement and muscle energy technique in elderly with knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind randomized control trial.

BackgroundManaging knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) effectively often requires a multifaceted approach that includes various manual therapy techniques to reduce pain and improve joint function in the elderly. The effectiveness of manipulation with movement (MWM) and muscle energy technique (MET) is still unclear.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of MWM and MET in the elderly with KOA over time.MethodsA double-blind randomized control trial was conducted in the rehabilitation division of Surakarta Hospital, Indonesia, with 54 participants randomized into two groups. The effects of MWM and MET on pain (Numeric Rating Scale), knee range of motion, static and dynamic balance, lower limb muscle strength, and fear of falling (FoF) were observed after 4 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks of follow-up. Repeated-measures ANOVA compared mean outcomes over time between the groups, and a t-test compared mean differences between groups.ResultsThere was no mean difference in baseline between groups. MET and MWM showed a significant effect of time on all outcome measures (p < 0.05). MWM revealed higher knee flexion (p < 0.001), TUG (p = 0.010) and FoF (p = 0.008) after 4 weeks (p < 0.05). The follow-up resulted in significant differences between groups, knee flexion, TUG and one leg stance (OLS) on the left side and open eyes were higher in the MWM group.ConclusionsBoth MWM and MET were effective treatment strategies in managing KOA. MWM had a greater effect on improving knee flexion movement, dynamic balance and FoF than MET. OLS with open eyes was observed stable in follow-up observation in the MWM group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信