Anthony Quach, Nimish Patel, Hailey Hirata, Annie Bui, Julie Trinh, Shreya Bahl, Ila M Saunders
{"title":"评估同种异体造血干细胞移植患者雷替韦预防与用药方案复杂性指数随时间的关系。","authors":"Anthony Quach, Nimish Patel, Hailey Hirata, Annie Bui, Julie Trinh, Shreya Bahl, Ila M Saunders","doi":"10.1177/10781552251330276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe medication regimen complexity index (MRCI) quantifies patient-level regimen complexity, and higher scores are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Characterization of regimens using the MRCI for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients remains unexplored. Regimens may include letermovir which is used for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and may prevent the need for addition of complex preemptive therapies. However, quantification of complexity in patients receiving letermovir has not been described.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare MRCI scores over a one-year period in allo-HCT recipients who received letermovir prophylaxis versus those who did not.MethodsA retrospective analysis included adults who underwent allo-HCT from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2021. MRCI scores were calculated at admission, discharge, day +100, 6 months, and 1-year post-transplant.ResultsA total of 218 patients were included, with 67 receiving letermovir and 151 not receiving letermovir. Median MRCI scores were comparable at discharge post allo-HCT (23 [10-39] vs 22 [12-37], <i>p </i>= 0.97). However, at day +100, patients in the letermovir group exhibited significantly higher median scores compared to the non-letermovir group (59 [46-74] vs 50 [37-67], <i>p </i>= 0.009). By 1-year post allo-HCT, no significant difference in scores was observed between groups (47 [30-68] vs 41 [27-61], <i>p </i>= 0.12).Conclusion and RelevanceThis study revealed increased MRCI scores up to one year after transplantation in allo-HCT recipients receiving letermovir. The nonrandomized study design and potential patient differences between groups complicate the interpretation of the findings. Future analyses should aim to account for these differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251330276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the relationship between letermovir prophylaxis and medication regimen complexity Index over time in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Quach, Nimish Patel, Hailey Hirata, Annie Bui, Julie Trinh, Shreya Bahl, Ila M Saunders\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10781552251330276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe medication regimen complexity index (MRCI) quantifies patient-level regimen complexity, and higher scores are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Characterization of regimens using the MRCI for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients remains unexplored. Regimens may include letermovir which is used for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and may prevent the need for addition of complex preemptive therapies. However, quantification of complexity in patients receiving letermovir has not been described.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare MRCI scores over a one-year period in allo-HCT recipients who received letermovir prophylaxis versus those who did not.MethodsA retrospective analysis included adults who underwent allo-HCT from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2021. MRCI scores were calculated at admission, discharge, day +100, 6 months, and 1-year post-transplant.ResultsA total of 218 patients were included, with 67 receiving letermovir and 151 not receiving letermovir. Median MRCI scores were comparable at discharge post allo-HCT (23 [10-39] vs 22 [12-37], <i>p </i>= 0.97). However, at day +100, patients in the letermovir group exhibited significantly higher median scores compared to the non-letermovir group (59 [46-74] vs 50 [37-67], <i>p </i>= 0.009). By 1-year post allo-HCT, no significant difference in scores was observed between groups (47 [30-68] vs 41 [27-61], <i>p </i>= 0.12).Conclusion and RelevanceThis study revealed increased MRCI scores up to one year after transplantation in allo-HCT recipients receiving letermovir. The nonrandomized study design and potential patient differences between groups complicate the interpretation of the findings. Future analyses should aim to account for these differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10781552251330276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251330276\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251330276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
用药方案复杂性指数(MRCI)量化了患者层面的用药方案复杂性,得分越高与不良临床结果相关。同种异体造血细胞移植(同种异体造血细胞移植)受者的MRCI方案的特性仍然未被探索。治疗方案可能包括用于巨细胞病毒预防的利特莫韦,并可能防止需要额外的复杂的先发制人的治疗。然而,接受letermovir治疗的患者复杂性的量化尚未得到描述。目的:本研究旨在比较接受莱替韦预防治疗和未接受莱替韦预防治疗的同种hct患者在一年内的MRCI评分。方法回顾性分析2016年1月1日至2021年10月31日接受allo-HCT治疗的成人患者。在移植后入院、出院、100天、6个月和1年计算MRCI评分。结果共纳入218例患者,接受雷替莫韦治疗的患者67例,未接受雷替莫韦治疗的患者151例。在alloo - hct后出院时,MRCI中位数评分相当(23 [10-39]vs 22 [12-37], p = 0.97)。然而,在第100天,letermovir组患者的中位评分明显高于非letermovir组(59 [46-74]vs 50 [37-67], p = 0.009)。alloo - hct后1年,各组评分无显著差异(47 [30-68]vs 41 [27-61], p = 0.12)。结论和相关性:本研究显示,接受雷替莫韦治疗的同种异体hct受体移植后1年MRCI评分升高。非随机研究设计和组间潜在的患者差异使研究结果的解释复杂化。未来的分析应该着眼于解释这些差异。
Evaluating the relationship between letermovir prophylaxis and medication regimen complexity Index over time in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.
BackgroundThe medication regimen complexity index (MRCI) quantifies patient-level regimen complexity, and higher scores are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Characterization of regimens using the MRCI for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients remains unexplored. Regimens may include letermovir which is used for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and may prevent the need for addition of complex preemptive therapies. However, quantification of complexity in patients receiving letermovir has not been described.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare MRCI scores over a one-year period in allo-HCT recipients who received letermovir prophylaxis versus those who did not.MethodsA retrospective analysis included adults who underwent allo-HCT from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2021. MRCI scores were calculated at admission, discharge, day +100, 6 months, and 1-year post-transplant.ResultsA total of 218 patients were included, with 67 receiving letermovir and 151 not receiving letermovir. Median MRCI scores were comparable at discharge post allo-HCT (23 [10-39] vs 22 [12-37], p = 0.97). However, at day +100, patients in the letermovir group exhibited significantly higher median scores compared to the non-letermovir group (59 [46-74] vs 50 [37-67], p = 0.009). By 1-year post allo-HCT, no significant difference in scores was observed between groups (47 [30-68] vs 41 [27-61], p = 0.12).Conclusion and RelevanceThis study revealed increased MRCI scores up to one year after transplantation in allo-HCT recipients receiving letermovir. The nonrandomized study design and potential patient differences between groups complicate the interpretation of the findings. Future analyses should aim to account for these differences.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...