腹部穿支交换(APEX)技术在延迟上腹部下深穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建穿支选择算法中的作用。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dmitry V Melnikov, Elina I Abdeeva, Semyon I Ivanov, Victor A Gombolevskiy
{"title":"腹部穿支交换(APEX)技术在延迟上腹部下深穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建穿支选择算法中的作用。","authors":"Dmitry V Melnikov, Elina I Abdeeva, Semyon I Ivanov, Victor A Gombolevskiy","doi":"10.3390/jcm14093256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is currently the most widely used method for autologous breast reconstruction. Its primary advantage over the transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap is the reduction in donor-site morbidity, as it preserves the integrity of the abdominal muscles and motor nerves. Importantly, each patient's unique vascular anatomy requires an individualized approach to perforator selection and the surgical technique. <b>Objective</b>: We aimed to minimize donor-site morbidity and refine the perforator selection strategy in delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction using the abdominal perforator exchange (APEX) technique. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: In this study, we prospectively and retrospectively analyzed the use of the APEX technique in patients undergoing delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction between April 2020 and October 2024. All patients underwent preoperative non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography of the donor area. A total of 106 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: 34 patients underwent reconstruction using the APEX technique, and 72 patients received standard DIEP flap breast reconstruction. <b>Results</b>: Our study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in operative time, averaging 30.5 min in the APEX group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was also a significant difference in the incidence of marginal flap necrosis between the two groups. No cases of myotomy were observed, and motor nerve transection was required in one case. <b>Conclusions</b>: The APEX technique has been shown to be reliable when standard dissection would compromise the neuromuscular anatomy of the abdominal wall without compromising perfusion in the flap.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12072376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Technique in the Perforator Selection Algorithm for Delayed Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Dmitry V Melnikov, Elina I Abdeeva, Semyon I Ivanov, Victor A Gombolevskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14093256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is currently the most widely used method for autologous breast reconstruction. Its primary advantage over the transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap is the reduction in donor-site morbidity, as it preserves the integrity of the abdominal muscles and motor nerves. Importantly, each patient's unique vascular anatomy requires an individualized approach to perforator selection and the surgical technique. <b>Objective</b>: We aimed to minimize donor-site morbidity and refine the perforator selection strategy in delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction using the abdominal perforator exchange (APEX) technique. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: In this study, we prospectively and retrospectively analyzed the use of the APEX technique in patients undergoing delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction between April 2020 and October 2024. All patients underwent preoperative non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography of the donor area. A total of 106 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: 34 patients underwent reconstruction using the APEX technique, and 72 patients received standard DIEP flap breast reconstruction. <b>Results</b>: Our study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in operative time, averaging 30.5 min in the APEX group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was also a significant difference in the incidence of marginal flap necrosis between the two groups. No cases of myotomy were observed, and motor nerve transection was required in one case. <b>Conclusions</b>: The APEX technique has been shown to be reliable when standard dissection would compromise the neuromuscular anatomy of the abdominal wall without compromising perfusion in the flap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12072376/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣是目前应用最广泛的自体乳房再造术。与TRAM皮瓣相比,它的主要优点是减少了供区发病率,因为它保留了腹肌和运动神经的完整性。重要的是,每个患者独特的血管解剖结构需要个性化的方法来选择穿支和手术技术。目的:探讨应用腹腔穿支交换(APEX)技术进行延迟DIEP皮瓣乳房再造术时的穿支选择策略,以减少供区并发症。材料与方法:在本研究中,我们前瞻性和回顾性分析了APEX技术在2020年4月至2024年10月期间接受延迟DIEP皮瓣乳房重建的患者中的应用。所有患者术前均行供区非对比磁共振血管造影。共纳入106例患者,分为两组:34例患者采用APEX技术重建,72例患者采用标准DIEP皮瓣乳房重建。结果:我们的研究显示,APEX组的手术时间有统计学意义,平均为30.5 min (p < 0.05)。两组间皮瓣边缘坏死的发生率也有显著差异。未见肌切开术,1例行运动神经横断术。结论:当标准解剖会损害腹壁神经肌肉解剖而不影响皮瓣灌注时,APEX技术已被证明是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Technique in the Perforator Selection Algorithm for Delayed Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Background: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is currently the most widely used method for autologous breast reconstruction. Its primary advantage over the transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap is the reduction in donor-site morbidity, as it preserves the integrity of the abdominal muscles and motor nerves. Importantly, each patient's unique vascular anatomy requires an individualized approach to perforator selection and the surgical technique. Objective: We aimed to minimize donor-site morbidity and refine the perforator selection strategy in delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction using the abdominal perforator exchange (APEX) technique. Materials and Methods: In this study, we prospectively and retrospectively analyzed the use of the APEX technique in patients undergoing delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction between April 2020 and October 2024. All patients underwent preoperative non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography of the donor area. A total of 106 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: 34 patients underwent reconstruction using the APEX technique, and 72 patients received standard DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Results: Our study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in operative time, averaging 30.5 min in the APEX group (p < 0.05). There was also a significant difference in the incidence of marginal flap necrosis between the two groups. No cases of myotomy were observed, and motor nerve transection was required in one case. Conclusions: The APEX technique has been shown to be reliable when standard dissection would compromise the neuromuscular anatomy of the abdominal wall without compromising perfusion in the flap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信