Ming Wang, Shiguang Zhu, Jiayi Long, Mengyue Cao, Yanbo Peng, Jing Chen, Tan Xu, Jiang He, Yonghong Zhang, Chongke Zhong
{"title":"按平均动脉压和脉压分层的急性缺血性脑卒中患者立即降压治疗的疗效:中国急性缺血性脑卒中降压试验的二次分析","authors":"Ming Wang, Shiguang Zhu, Jiayi Long, Mengyue Cao, Yanbo Peng, Jing Chen, Tan Xu, Jiang He, Yonghong Zhang, Chongke Zhong","doi":"10.1136/svn-2024-003896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP), two indicators of cerebral perfusion, could guide the selection of anti-hypertensive strategies after acute ischaemic stroke remains uncertain. Our study was to explore the impact of early anti-hypertensive intervention on adverse clinical outcomes following ischaemic stroke stratified by the levels of MAP and PP based on the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial randomised 4071 acute ischaemic stroke patients with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) to receive anti-hypertensive treatment (targeting a 10%-25% reduction in SBP during the 24 hours postrandomisation, reaching a BP level <140/90 mm Hg in 7 days, further keeping these levels throughout hospitalisation) or discontinue anti-hypertensive treatment during hospitalisation. The primary outcome was death or major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. Study outcomes were analysed by comparing the BP-lowering intervention group and control group, stratified by tertiles of MAP or PP levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome between the intervention and control groups across all MAP (p=0.69 for homogeneity) and PP (p=0.78 for homogeneity) categories. The corresponding odds ratios (95% CIs) were 1.08 (0.85-1.36), 0.92 (0.74-1.15) and 1.00 (0.81-1.25) for participants with low, intermediate, and high MAP and were 0.99 (0.79-1.25), 1.06 (0.84-1.34) and 0.95 (0.77-1.18) for participants in PP subgroups, respectively. Furthermore, early anti-hypertensive intervention was not associated with secondary outcomes (including neurological deterioration, recurrent stroke, vascular events and all-cause mortality) by MAP and PP (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early anti-hypertensive therapy neither decreased nor increased the odds of major disability, mortality, recurrent stroke or vascular events in patients with acute ischaemic stroke regardless of different MAP and PP levels.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01840072.</p>","PeriodicalId":48733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of immediate anti-hypertensive treatment in patients with acute ischaemic stroke stratified by mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure: a secondary analysis of the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Wang, Shiguang Zhu, Jiayi Long, Mengyue Cao, Yanbo Peng, Jing Chen, Tan Xu, Jiang He, Yonghong Zhang, Chongke Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/svn-2024-003896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP), two indicators of cerebral perfusion, could guide the selection of anti-hypertensive strategies after acute ischaemic stroke remains uncertain. Our study was to explore the impact of early anti-hypertensive intervention on adverse clinical outcomes following ischaemic stroke stratified by the levels of MAP and PP based on the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial randomised 4071 acute ischaemic stroke patients with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) to receive anti-hypertensive treatment (targeting a 10%-25% reduction in SBP during the 24 hours postrandomisation, reaching a BP level <140/90 mm Hg in 7 days, further keeping these levels throughout hospitalisation) or discontinue anti-hypertensive treatment during hospitalisation. The primary outcome was death or major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. Study outcomes were analysed by comparing the BP-lowering intervention group and control group, stratified by tertiles of MAP or PP levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome between the intervention and control groups across all MAP (p=0.69 for homogeneity) and PP (p=0.78 for homogeneity) categories. The corresponding odds ratios (95% CIs) were 1.08 (0.85-1.36), 0.92 (0.74-1.15) and 1.00 (0.81-1.25) for participants with low, intermediate, and high MAP and were 0.99 (0.79-1.25), 1.06 (0.84-1.34) and 0.95 (0.77-1.18) for participants in PP subgroups, respectively. Furthermore, early anti-hypertensive intervention was not associated with secondary outcomes (including neurological deterioration, recurrent stroke, vascular events and all-cause mortality) by MAP and PP (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early anti-hypertensive therapy neither decreased nor increased the odds of major disability, mortality, recurrent stroke or vascular events in patients with acute ischaemic stroke regardless of different MAP and PP levels.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01840072.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2024-003896\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2024-003896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of immediate anti-hypertensive treatment in patients with acute ischaemic stroke stratified by mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure: a secondary analysis of the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke trial.
Background: Whether mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP), two indicators of cerebral perfusion, could guide the selection of anti-hypertensive strategies after acute ischaemic stroke remains uncertain. Our study was to explore the impact of early anti-hypertensive intervention on adverse clinical outcomes following ischaemic stroke stratified by the levels of MAP and PP based on the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS).
Methods: The trial randomised 4071 acute ischaemic stroke patients with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) to receive anti-hypertensive treatment (targeting a 10%-25% reduction in SBP during the 24 hours postrandomisation, reaching a BP level <140/90 mm Hg in 7 days, further keeping these levels throughout hospitalisation) or discontinue anti-hypertensive treatment during hospitalisation. The primary outcome was death or major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. Study outcomes were analysed by comparing the BP-lowering intervention group and control group, stratified by tertiles of MAP or PP levels.
Results: No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome between the intervention and control groups across all MAP (p=0.69 for homogeneity) and PP (p=0.78 for homogeneity) categories. The corresponding odds ratios (95% CIs) were 1.08 (0.85-1.36), 0.92 (0.74-1.15) and 1.00 (0.81-1.25) for participants with low, intermediate, and high MAP and were 0.99 (0.79-1.25), 1.06 (0.84-1.34) and 0.95 (0.77-1.18) for participants in PP subgroups, respectively. Furthermore, early anti-hypertensive intervention was not associated with secondary outcomes (including neurological deterioration, recurrent stroke, vascular events and all-cause mortality) by MAP and PP (all p>0.05).
Conclusions: Early anti-hypertensive therapy neither decreased nor increased the odds of major disability, mortality, recurrent stroke or vascular events in patients with acute ischaemic stroke regardless of different MAP and PP levels.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research.
JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.