岩石破坏模拟的随机RFPA方法。

IF 5.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s00603-025-04400-3
Bin Gong, Tao Zhao, Indrasenan Thusyanthan, Chun'an Tang, Gordon G D Zhou
{"title":"岩石破坏模拟的随机RFPA方法。","authors":"Bin Gong, Tao Zhao, Indrasenan Thusyanthan, Chun'an Tang, Gordon G D Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00603-025-04400-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The random rock failure process analysis (RRFPA) method was developed in this research to characterize the material spatial variability and uncertainty in rock failure modelling. The random field theory (RFT) was integrated with the traditional rock failure process analysis (RFPA) to model rock heterogeneity. In this approach, the variation of rock properties is represented as a function of relative distance, such that the influence of material intrinsic correlation on its fracturing behaviour can be appropriately captured. To validate the theory, 300 RRFPA simulations were conducted to investigate the failure characteristics of rock samples under compressive loading. The results showed that by incorporating a spectrum of material properties, the numerical outcomes exhibited distinct upper and lower bounds of stress across all testing scenarios, closely aligning with the experimental relationships. The histograms for uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus showed that both properties followed normal distributions, with the average values of 10.099 MPa and 1.818 GPa, respectively. The corresponding coefficients of variation were 0.450 and 0.038. The localized failure tended to result in a more rapid release of acoustic emission energy, but generated smaller cumulative energy compared to the overall failure pattern. In general, the maximum relative error of the RRFPA model was only 0.66% for uniaxial compressive strength, elastic modulus, and critical axial strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":21280,"journal":{"name":"Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering","volume":"58 5","pages":"5115-5128"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Random RFPA Method for Modelling Rock Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Bin Gong, Tao Zhao, Indrasenan Thusyanthan, Chun'an Tang, Gordon G D Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00603-025-04400-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The random rock failure process analysis (RRFPA) method was developed in this research to characterize the material spatial variability and uncertainty in rock failure modelling. The random field theory (RFT) was integrated with the traditional rock failure process analysis (RFPA) to model rock heterogeneity. In this approach, the variation of rock properties is represented as a function of relative distance, such that the influence of material intrinsic correlation on its fracturing behaviour can be appropriately captured. To validate the theory, 300 RRFPA simulations were conducted to investigate the failure characteristics of rock samples under compressive loading. The results showed that by incorporating a spectrum of material properties, the numerical outcomes exhibited distinct upper and lower bounds of stress across all testing scenarios, closely aligning with the experimental relationships. The histograms for uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus showed that both properties followed normal distributions, with the average values of 10.099 MPa and 1.818 GPa, respectively. The corresponding coefficients of variation were 0.450 and 0.038. The localized failure tended to result in a more rapid release of acoustic emission energy, but generated smaller cumulative energy compared to the overall failure pattern. In general, the maximum relative error of the RRFPA model was only 0.66% for uniaxial compressive strength, elastic modulus, and critical axial strain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering\",\"volume\":\"58 5\",\"pages\":\"5115-5128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048433/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04400-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04400-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了随机岩石破坏过程分析(RRFPA)方法,以表征岩石破坏模型中材料的空间变异性和不确定性。将随机场理论(RFT)与传统的岩石破坏过程分析(RFPA)相结合,模拟岩石非均质性。在这种方法中,岩石性质的变化被表示为相对距离的函数,这样就可以适当地捕捉到材料的内在相关性对其破裂行为的影响。为了验证这一理论,进行了300次RRFPA模拟,研究了岩石试样在压缩载荷作用下的破坏特征。结果表明,通过纳入材料性能谱,数值结果在所有测试场景中都显示出明显的应力上限和下限,与实验关系密切一致。单轴抗压强度和弹性模量直方图均服从正态分布,平均值分别为10.099 MPa和1.818 GPa。变异系数分别为0.450和0.038。局部破坏往往导致声发射能量释放更快,但与整体破坏模式相比,产生的累积能量较小。总的来说,RRFPA模型在单轴抗压强度、弹性模量和临界轴向应变上的最大相对误差仅为0.66%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Random RFPA Method for Modelling Rock Failure.

The random rock failure process analysis (RRFPA) method was developed in this research to characterize the material spatial variability and uncertainty in rock failure modelling. The random field theory (RFT) was integrated with the traditional rock failure process analysis (RFPA) to model rock heterogeneity. In this approach, the variation of rock properties is represented as a function of relative distance, such that the influence of material intrinsic correlation on its fracturing behaviour can be appropriately captured. To validate the theory, 300 RRFPA simulations were conducted to investigate the failure characteristics of rock samples under compressive loading. The results showed that by incorporating a spectrum of material properties, the numerical outcomes exhibited distinct upper and lower bounds of stress across all testing scenarios, closely aligning with the experimental relationships. The histograms for uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus showed that both properties followed normal distributions, with the average values of 10.099 MPa and 1.818 GPa, respectively. The corresponding coefficients of variation were 0.450 and 0.038. The localized failure tended to result in a more rapid release of acoustic emission energy, but generated smaller cumulative energy compared to the overall failure pattern. In general, the maximum relative error of the RRFPA model was only 0.66% for uniaxial compressive strength, elastic modulus, and critical axial strain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
11.30%
发文量
405
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering covers the experimental and theoretical aspects of rock mechanics, including laboratory and field testing, methods of computation and field observation of structural behavior. The journal maintains the strong link between engineering geology and rock engineering, providing a bridge between fundamental developments and practical application. Coverage includes case histories on design and construction of structures in rock such as underground openings, large dam foundations and rock slopes. Fields of interest include rock mechanics in all its varied aspects including laboratory testing, field investigations, computational methods and design principles. The journal also reports on applications in tunneling, rock slopes, large dam foundations, mining, engineering and engineering geology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信