[德国医疗助理积极参与初级保健研究]。

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Susanne Kersten, Doreen Kuschick, Annett Bräsigk, Andreas Polanc, Sandra Salm
{"title":"[德国医疗助理积极参与初级保健研究]。","authors":"Susanne Kersten, Doreen Kuschick, Annett Bräsigk, Andreas Polanc, Sandra Salm","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since 2020, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research has been funding the establishment of six research practice networks in primary care in Germany through the Initiative DESAM-ForNet. The aim is to create a practice-based and efficient research infrastructure. The involvement of medical assistants (MAs) in these networks is of central importance, as they are able to contribute valuable perspectives and knowledge through their daily practice work and are often involved in studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three tabular instruments were developed to record MA participation. In each research practice network, the tables were used to document the involvement of MAs in the network structure, their qualifications and their role in research projects. The information from each network was discussed and summarized in terms of similarities and differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reports were provided from five practice-based research networks where MAs are actively involved in various participation formats such as committees, round tables, and advisory boards. MAs are involved at different quality levels in the development of the networks and the implementation of studies. In addition, the practice-based research network offers specific qualifications to train MAs for research work. MAs receive financial incentives and/or certificates for their participation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results show that MAs play an important role in research practice networks, especially in a co-determining function. Overall, MA participation through research practice networks is established, but not yet as self-evident as patient participation. In order to further strengthen participation of MAs, future measures should promote their involvement in decision-making processes and enable them to obtain additional qualifications. The role of MAs in research should be further expanded at all quality levels of involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The active involvement of MAs in the development and operation of research practice networks is essential to ensure the practical relevance of research projects. Greater participation could further improve the quality of research and should therefore be specifically promoted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Active participation of medical assistants in primary care research in Germany].\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Kersten, Doreen Kuschick, Annett Bräsigk, Andreas Polanc, Sandra Salm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since 2020, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research has been funding the establishment of six research practice networks in primary care in Germany through the Initiative DESAM-ForNet. The aim is to create a practice-based and efficient research infrastructure. The involvement of medical assistants (MAs) in these networks is of central importance, as they are able to contribute valuable perspectives and knowledge through their daily practice work and are often involved in studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three tabular instruments were developed to record MA participation. In each research practice network, the tables were used to document the involvement of MAs in the network structure, their qualifications and their role in research projects. The information from each network was discussed and summarized in terms of similarities and differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reports were provided from five practice-based research networks where MAs are actively involved in various participation formats such as committees, round tables, and advisory boards. MAs are involved at different quality levels in the development of the networks and the implementation of studies. In addition, the practice-based research network offers specific qualifications to train MAs for research work. MAs receive financial incentives and/or certificates for their participation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results show that MAs play an important role in research practice networks, especially in a co-determining function. Overall, MA participation through research practice networks is established, but not yet as self-evident as patient participation. In order to further strengthen participation of MAs, future measures should promote their involvement in decision-making processes and enable them to obtain additional qualifications. The role of MAs in research should be further expanded at all quality levels of involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The active involvement of MAs in the development and operation of research practice networks is essential to ensure the practical relevance of research projects. Greater participation could further improve the quality of research and should therefore be specifically promoted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.03.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.03.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:自2020年以来,联邦教育和研究部一直在通过DESAM-ForNet倡议资助在德国建立六个初级保健研究实践网络。其目的是创建一个基于实践的高效研究基础设施。医疗助理(MAs)在这些网络中的参与至关重要,因为他们能够通过日常实践工作贡献有价值的观点和知识,并且经常参与研究。方法:研制了三种表格仪器记录MA的参与情况。在每个研究实践网络中,这些表格用于记录ma在网络结构中的参与情况,他们的资格和他们在研究项目中的作用。从异同方面对各网络的信息进行了讨论和总结。结果:报告来自五个基于实践的研究网络,其中MAs积极参与各种参与形式,如委员会,圆桌会议和咨询委员会。MAs以不同的质量水平参与网络的发展和研究的实施。此外,以实践为基础的研究网络提供了专门的资格来培训硕士从事研究工作。MAs的参与将获得财政奖励和/或证书。讨论:研究结果表明,MAs在研究实践网络中发挥着重要作用,特别是在共同决定功能方面。总体而言,通过研究实践网络的MA参与是建立的,但尚未像患者参与那样不言而喻。为了进一步加强行政管理人员的参与,今后的措施应促进他们参与决策过程,并使他们能够获得额外的资格。硕士在研究中的作用应进一步扩大到所有高质量的参与水平。结论:MAs积极参与研究实践网络的开发和运营,对于确保研究项目的实际相关性至关重要。更多的参与可以进一步提高研究的质量,因此应该特别加以促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Active participation of medical assistants in primary care research in Germany].

Introduction: Since 2020, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research has been funding the establishment of six research practice networks in primary care in Germany through the Initiative DESAM-ForNet. The aim is to create a practice-based and efficient research infrastructure. The involvement of medical assistants (MAs) in these networks is of central importance, as they are able to contribute valuable perspectives and knowledge through their daily practice work and are often involved in studies.

Methods: Three tabular instruments were developed to record MA participation. In each research practice network, the tables were used to document the involvement of MAs in the network structure, their qualifications and their role in research projects. The information from each network was discussed and summarized in terms of similarities and differences.

Results: Reports were provided from five practice-based research networks where MAs are actively involved in various participation formats such as committees, round tables, and advisory boards. MAs are involved at different quality levels in the development of the networks and the implementation of studies. In addition, the practice-based research network offers specific qualifications to train MAs for research work. MAs receive financial incentives and/or certificates for their participation.

Discussion: The results show that MAs play an important role in research practice networks, especially in a co-determining function. Overall, MA participation through research practice networks is established, but not yet as self-evident as patient participation. In order to further strengthen participation of MAs, future measures should promote their involvement in decision-making processes and enable them to obtain additional qualifications. The role of MAs in research should be further expanded at all quality levels of involvement.

Conclusion: The active involvement of MAs in the development and operation of research practice networks is essential to ensure the practical relevance of research projects. Greater participation could further improve the quality of research and should therefore be specifically promoted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信