Mark V Schaverien, Puneet Singh, Henry M Kuerer, Catherine L Akay, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Carrie K Chu, Mark W Clemens, Wei Qiao, Benjamin D Smith, Karen E Hoffman
{"title":"乳房切除术前与术后放射治疗显微外科乳房重建的疗效比较。","authors":"Mark V Schaverien, Puneet Singh, Henry M Kuerer, Catherine L Akay, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Carrie K Chu, Mark W Clemens, Wei Qiao, Benjamin D Smith, Karen E Hoffman","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared complication rates and outcomes between patients who underwent premastectomy radiation therapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy with microsurgical immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) and patients who underwent mastectomy followed by postmastectomy RT (PMRT) then microsurgical delayed breast reconstruction (DBR).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT02912312) that randomized patients with breast cancer to receive hypofractionated (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) or conventionally fractionated (50 Gy/25 fractions) regional nodal irradiation (RNI) between August 2018 and August 2022. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of autologous flap loss. Secondary outcomes included rates of other recipient-site complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>144 patients were included: 41 underwent PreMRT with IMBR and 103 underwent PMRT with DBR, including 66 that had tissue expander (TE) placement at the time of mastectomy and 37 who underwent total mastectomy. The median time from mastectomy to DBR was 12.8 months (IQR, 9.7-16.3 months). There were no complete autologous flap losses in either group and rates of other recipient site complications were similar between the groups. Infection at the recipient site occurred in 20% (13/66) of patients in the PMRT group that underwent TE placement, and 9 (14%) required TE explantation because of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PreMRT with microvascular IMBR is associated with a similar complication rate to PMRT with microvascular DBR whilst avoiding complications relating to TE placement and a reduced time to achieve definitive breast reconstruction. A larger randomized clinical trial of PreMRT followed by mastectomy and IMBR is currently underway (NCT05774678).</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Outcomes of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction after Premastectomy and Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Mark V Schaverien, Puneet Singh, Henry M Kuerer, Catherine L Akay, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Carrie K Chu, Mark W Clemens, Wei Qiao, Benjamin D Smith, Karen E Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared complication rates and outcomes between patients who underwent premastectomy radiation therapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy with microsurgical immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) and patients who underwent mastectomy followed by postmastectomy RT (PMRT) then microsurgical delayed breast reconstruction (DBR).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT02912312) that randomized patients with breast cancer to receive hypofractionated (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) or conventionally fractionated (50 Gy/25 fractions) regional nodal irradiation (RNI) between August 2018 and August 2022. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of autologous flap loss. Secondary outcomes included rates of other recipient-site complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>144 patients were included: 41 underwent PreMRT with IMBR and 103 underwent PMRT with DBR, including 66 that had tissue expander (TE) placement at the time of mastectomy and 37 who underwent total mastectomy. The median time from mastectomy to DBR was 12.8 months (IQR, 9.7-16.3 months). There were no complete autologous flap losses in either group and rates of other recipient site complications were similar between the groups. Infection at the recipient site occurred in 20% (13/66) of patients in the PMRT group that underwent TE placement, and 9 (14%) required TE explantation because of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PreMRT with microvascular IMBR is associated with a similar complication rate to PMRT with microvascular DBR whilst avoiding complications relating to TE placement and a reduced time to achieve definitive breast reconstruction. A larger randomized clinical trial of PreMRT followed by mastectomy and IMBR is currently underway (NCT05774678).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Outcomes of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction after Premastectomy and Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.
Background: This study compared complication rates and outcomes between patients who underwent premastectomy radiation therapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy with microsurgical immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) and patients who underwent mastectomy followed by postmastectomy RT (PMRT) then microsurgical delayed breast reconstruction (DBR).
Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT02912312) that randomized patients with breast cancer to receive hypofractionated (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) or conventionally fractionated (50 Gy/25 fractions) regional nodal irradiation (RNI) between August 2018 and August 2022. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of autologous flap loss. Secondary outcomes included rates of other recipient-site complications.
Results: 144 patients were included: 41 underwent PreMRT with IMBR and 103 underwent PMRT with DBR, including 66 that had tissue expander (TE) placement at the time of mastectomy and 37 who underwent total mastectomy. The median time from mastectomy to DBR was 12.8 months (IQR, 9.7-16.3 months). There were no complete autologous flap losses in either group and rates of other recipient site complications were similar between the groups. Infection at the recipient site occurred in 20% (13/66) of patients in the PMRT group that underwent TE placement, and 9 (14%) required TE explantation because of complications.
Conclusion: PreMRT with microvascular IMBR is associated with a similar complication rate to PMRT with microvascular DBR whilst avoiding complications relating to TE placement and a reduced time to achieve definitive breast reconstruction. A larger randomized clinical trial of PreMRT followed by mastectomy and IMBR is currently underway (NCT05774678).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.