乳房切除术前与术后放射治疗显微外科乳房重建的疗效比较。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Mark V Schaverien, Puneet Singh, Henry M Kuerer, Catherine L Akay, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Carrie K Chu, Mark W Clemens, Wei Qiao, Benjamin D Smith, Karen E Hoffman
{"title":"乳房切除术前与术后放射治疗显微外科乳房重建的疗效比较。","authors":"Mark V Schaverien, Puneet Singh, Henry M Kuerer, Catherine L Akay, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Carrie K Chu, Mark W Clemens, Wei Qiao, Benjamin D Smith, Karen E Hoffman","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared complication rates and outcomes between patients who underwent premastectomy radiation therapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy with microsurgical immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) and patients who underwent mastectomy followed by postmastectomy RT (PMRT) then microsurgical delayed breast reconstruction (DBR).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT02912312) that randomized patients with breast cancer to receive hypofractionated (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) or conventionally fractionated (50 Gy/25 fractions) regional nodal irradiation (RNI) between August 2018 and August 2022. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of autologous flap loss. Secondary outcomes included rates of other recipient-site complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>144 patients were included: 41 underwent PreMRT with IMBR and 103 underwent PMRT with DBR, including 66 that had tissue expander (TE) placement at the time of mastectomy and 37 who underwent total mastectomy. The median time from mastectomy to DBR was 12.8 months (IQR, 9.7-16.3 months). There were no complete autologous flap losses in either group and rates of other recipient site complications were similar between the groups. Infection at the recipient site occurred in 20% (13/66) of patients in the PMRT group that underwent TE placement, and 9 (14%) required TE explantation because of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PreMRT with microvascular IMBR is associated with a similar complication rate to PMRT with microvascular DBR whilst avoiding complications relating to TE placement and a reduced time to achieve definitive breast reconstruction. A larger randomized clinical trial of PreMRT followed by mastectomy and IMBR is currently underway (NCT05774678).</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Outcomes of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction after Premastectomy and Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Mark V Schaverien, Puneet Singh, Henry M Kuerer, Catherine L Akay, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Carrie K Chu, Mark W Clemens, Wei Qiao, Benjamin D Smith, Karen E Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared complication rates and outcomes between patients who underwent premastectomy radiation therapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy with microsurgical immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) and patients who underwent mastectomy followed by postmastectomy RT (PMRT) then microsurgical delayed breast reconstruction (DBR).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT02912312) that randomized patients with breast cancer to receive hypofractionated (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) or conventionally fractionated (50 Gy/25 fractions) regional nodal irradiation (RNI) between August 2018 and August 2022. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of autologous flap loss. Secondary outcomes included rates of other recipient-site complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>144 patients were included: 41 underwent PreMRT with IMBR and 103 underwent PMRT with DBR, including 66 that had tissue expander (TE) placement at the time of mastectomy and 37 who underwent total mastectomy. The median time from mastectomy to DBR was 12.8 months (IQR, 9.7-16.3 months). There were no complete autologous flap losses in either group and rates of other recipient site complications were similar between the groups. Infection at the recipient site occurred in 20% (13/66) of patients in the PMRT group that underwent TE placement, and 9 (14%) required TE explantation because of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PreMRT with microvascular IMBR is associated with a similar complication rate to PMRT with microvascular DBR whilst avoiding complications relating to TE placement and a reduced time to achieve definitive breast reconstruction. A larger randomized clinical trial of PreMRT followed by mastectomy and IMBR is currently underway (NCT05774678).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究比较了乳房切除术前放疗(PreMRT)后乳房切除术显微手术即刻乳房重建(IMBR)和乳房切除术后RT (PMRT)后显微手术延迟乳房重建(DBR)患者的并发症发生率和结果。研究设计:这是对一项随机对照试验(NCT02912312)的二次分析,该试验将乳腺癌患者随机分组,在2018年8月至2022年8月期间接受低分割(40.05 Gy/15分)或常规分割(50 Gy/25分)区域淋巴结照射(RNI)。收集了人口统计学、治疗和结局数据。主要观察指标为自体皮瓣丢失率。次要结果包括其他受体部位并发症的发生率。结果:纳入144例患者:41例患者行PreMRT合并IMBR, 103例患者行PMRT合并DBR,其中66例在乳房切除术时放置组织扩张器(TE), 37例患者行全乳切除术。从乳房切除术到DBR的中位时间为12.8个月(IQR, 9.7-16.3个月)。两组均无自体皮瓣完全丢失,其他受体部位并发症发生率相似。在接受TE放置的PMRT组中,20%(13/66)的患者发生了受体部位感染,9(14%)的患者由于并发症需要TE切除。结论:微血管IMBR的PreMRT与微血管DBR的PMRT并发症发生率相似,同时避免了与TE放置相关的并发症,并缩短了完成最终乳房重建的时间。目前正在进行一项更大的PreMRT后乳房切除术和IMBR的随机临床试验(NCT05774678)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Outcomes of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction after Premastectomy and Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.

Background: This study compared complication rates and outcomes between patients who underwent premastectomy radiation therapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy with microsurgical immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) and patients who underwent mastectomy followed by postmastectomy RT (PMRT) then microsurgical delayed breast reconstruction (DBR).

Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT02912312) that randomized patients with breast cancer to receive hypofractionated (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) or conventionally fractionated (50 Gy/25 fractions) regional nodal irradiation (RNI) between August 2018 and August 2022. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of autologous flap loss. Secondary outcomes included rates of other recipient-site complications.

Results: 144 patients were included: 41 underwent PreMRT with IMBR and 103 underwent PMRT with DBR, including 66 that had tissue expander (TE) placement at the time of mastectomy and 37 who underwent total mastectomy. The median time from mastectomy to DBR was 12.8 months (IQR, 9.7-16.3 months). There were no complete autologous flap losses in either group and rates of other recipient site complications were similar between the groups. Infection at the recipient site occurred in 20% (13/66) of patients in the PMRT group that underwent TE placement, and 9 (14%) required TE explantation because of complications.

Conclusion: PreMRT with microvascular IMBR is associated with a similar complication rate to PMRT with microvascular DBR whilst avoiding complications relating to TE placement and a reduced time to achieve definitive breast reconstruction. A larger randomized clinical trial of PreMRT followed by mastectomy and IMBR is currently underway (NCT05774678).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信