关于CDS失败的特刊:与CDS系统试点实施相关的机遇和挑战:定性研究。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Nicki Newton, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Rowena Forsyth, Lenert Bruce, Steven M McPhail, Tim Shaw, Sundresan Naicker, Amina Tariq, Melissa Therese Baysari
{"title":"关于CDS失败的特刊:与CDS系统试点实施相关的机遇和挑战:定性研究。","authors":"Nicki Newton, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Rowena Forsyth, Lenert Bruce, Steven M McPhail, Tim Shaw, Sundresan Naicker, Amina Tariq, Melissa Therese Baysari","doi":"10.1055/a-2581-6236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite their potential, Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems often lack alignment with clinicians' needs and are underutilised in practice. Pilot implementations can help to improve the fit between systems and local needs by engaging users in real-world testing and refinement. Although pilot implementations of CDS have been reported, limited evidence has explored the factors contributing to pilot success.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of a CDS system that ultimately did not progress to full-scale implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with clinicians, health service managers, and vendors involved in the pilot implementation and use of a mobile application-based CDS and a dashboard-based CDS in two departments (Emergency and Patient Flow) of a rural Australian hospital. A semi-structured interview guide was developed using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Sustainability, Scale-up, and Spread (NASSS) framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed four major themes: system performance and design, implementation processes, organisational support and resources, and perceived benefits of the CDS. The pilot implementation allowed for greater user input into the iterative design of CDS in practice, particularly in the Emergency Department, where clinicians had both the capacity and willingness to engage. However, technical issues encountered early in the pilot deterred many users who did not re-engage even after issues were resolved. Although some users remained engaged, they became frustrated as organisational resource constraints meant that critical issues impacting the CDS's clinical utility went unresolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful CDS pilots depend on the readiness of organisations, departments, and users to engage in pilot activities. Pilot implementations should be pursued in settings where users have both the capacity and willingness to participate in iterative feedback processes and where organisations have sufficient resources to address emerging needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Issue on CDS Failures: Opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of CDS systems: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicki Newton, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Rowena Forsyth, Lenert Bruce, Steven M McPhail, Tim Shaw, Sundresan Naicker, Amina Tariq, Melissa Therese Baysari\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2581-6236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite their potential, Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems often lack alignment with clinicians' needs and are underutilised in practice. Pilot implementations can help to improve the fit between systems and local needs by engaging users in real-world testing and refinement. Although pilot implementations of CDS have been reported, limited evidence has explored the factors contributing to pilot success.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of a CDS system that ultimately did not progress to full-scale implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with clinicians, health service managers, and vendors involved in the pilot implementation and use of a mobile application-based CDS and a dashboard-based CDS in two departments (Emergency and Patient Flow) of a rural Australian hospital. A semi-structured interview guide was developed using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Sustainability, Scale-up, and Spread (NASSS) framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed four major themes: system performance and design, implementation processes, organisational support and resources, and perceived benefits of the CDS. The pilot implementation allowed for greater user input into the iterative design of CDS in practice, particularly in the Emergency Department, where clinicians had both the capacity and willingness to engage. However, technical issues encountered early in the pilot deterred many users who did not re-engage even after issues were resolved. Although some users remained engaged, they became frustrated as organisational resource constraints meant that critical issues impacting the CDS's clinical utility went unresolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful CDS pilots depend on the readiness of organisations, departments, and users to engage in pilot activities. Pilot implementations should be pursued in settings where users have both the capacity and willingness to participate in iterative feedback processes and where organisations have sufficient resources to address emerging needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2581-6236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2581-6236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管具有潜力,临床决策支持(CDS)系统往往与临床医生的需求缺乏一致性,并且在实践中未得到充分利用。通过让用户参与实际测试和改进,试点实现可以帮助改进系统与本地需求之间的契合度。虽然已经报道了CDS的试点实施,但有限的证据探讨了促成试点成功的因素。目的:本研究旨在探讨与试点实施CDS系统相关的机遇和挑战,最终没有进展到全面实施。方法:我们在澳大利亚一家农村医院的两个科室(急诊科和病人流科)对临床医生、卫生服务经理和参与试点实施和使用基于移动应用程序的CDS和基于仪表板的CDS的供应商进行了访谈。采用非采用、放弃、可持续性、规模扩大和传播(NASSS)框架开发了半结构化访谈指南。访谈录音、文字记录和主题分析。结果:分析揭示了四个主要主题:系统性能和设计,实施过程,组织支持和资源,以及CDS的感知效益。试点实施使用户能够在实践中更多地投入到CDS的迭代设计中,特别是在急诊科,那里的临床医生既有能力也有意愿参与进来。然而,在试点早期遇到的技术问题阻止了许多用户,即使在问题解决后,他们也没有重新参与。尽管一些用户仍然参与其中,但他们感到沮丧,因为组织资源限制意味着影响CDS临床效用的关键问题得不到解决。结论:CDS试点的成功取决于组织、部门和用户参与试点活动的准备程度。试点实施应在用户有能力和意愿参与迭代反馈过程的环境中进行,并且组织有足够的资源来解决新出现的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special Issue on CDS Failures: Opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of CDS systems: A qualitative study.

Background: Despite their potential, Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems often lack alignment with clinicians' needs and are underutilised in practice. Pilot implementations can help to improve the fit between systems and local needs by engaging users in real-world testing and refinement. Although pilot implementations of CDS have been reported, limited evidence has explored the factors contributing to pilot success.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of a CDS system that ultimately did not progress to full-scale implementation.

Methods: We conducted interviews with clinicians, health service managers, and vendors involved in the pilot implementation and use of a mobile application-based CDS and a dashboard-based CDS in two departments (Emergency and Patient Flow) of a rural Australian hospital. A semi-structured interview guide was developed using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Sustainability, Scale-up, and Spread (NASSS) framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.

Results: Analysis revealed four major themes: system performance and design, implementation processes, organisational support and resources, and perceived benefits of the CDS. The pilot implementation allowed for greater user input into the iterative design of CDS in practice, particularly in the Emergency Department, where clinicians had both the capacity and willingness to engage. However, technical issues encountered early in the pilot deterred many users who did not re-engage even after issues were resolved. Although some users remained engaged, they became frustrated as organisational resource constraints meant that critical issues impacting the CDS's clinical utility went unresolved.

Conclusions: Successful CDS pilots depend on the readiness of organisations, departments, and users to engage in pilot activities. Pilot implementations should be pursued in settings where users have both the capacity and willingness to participate in iterative feedback processes and where organisations have sufficient resources to address emerging needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信