Nicki Newton, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Rowena Forsyth, Lenert Bruce, Steven M McPhail, Tim Shaw, Sundresan Naicker, Amina Tariq, Melissa Therese Baysari
{"title":"关于CDS失败的特刊:与CDS系统试点实施相关的机遇和挑战:定性研究。","authors":"Nicki Newton, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Rowena Forsyth, Lenert Bruce, Steven M McPhail, Tim Shaw, Sundresan Naicker, Amina Tariq, Melissa Therese Baysari","doi":"10.1055/a-2581-6236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite their potential, Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems often lack alignment with clinicians' needs and are underutilised in practice. Pilot implementations can help to improve the fit between systems and local needs by engaging users in real-world testing and refinement. Although pilot implementations of CDS have been reported, limited evidence has explored the factors contributing to pilot success.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of a CDS system that ultimately did not progress to full-scale implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with clinicians, health service managers, and vendors involved in the pilot implementation and use of a mobile application-based CDS and a dashboard-based CDS in two departments (Emergency and Patient Flow) of a rural Australian hospital. A semi-structured interview guide was developed using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Sustainability, Scale-up, and Spread (NASSS) framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed four major themes: system performance and design, implementation processes, organisational support and resources, and perceived benefits of the CDS. The pilot implementation allowed for greater user input into the iterative design of CDS in practice, particularly in the Emergency Department, where clinicians had both the capacity and willingness to engage. However, technical issues encountered early in the pilot deterred many users who did not re-engage even after issues were resolved. Although some users remained engaged, they became frustrated as organisational resource constraints meant that critical issues impacting the CDS's clinical utility went unresolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful CDS pilots depend on the readiness of organisations, departments, and users to engage in pilot activities. Pilot implementations should be pursued in settings where users have both the capacity and willingness to participate in iterative feedback processes and where organisations have sufficient resources to address emerging needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Issue on CDS Failures: Opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of CDS systems: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicki Newton, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Rowena Forsyth, Lenert Bruce, Steven M McPhail, Tim Shaw, Sundresan Naicker, Amina Tariq, Melissa Therese Baysari\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2581-6236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite their potential, Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems often lack alignment with clinicians' needs and are underutilised in practice. Pilot implementations can help to improve the fit between systems and local needs by engaging users in real-world testing and refinement. Although pilot implementations of CDS have been reported, limited evidence has explored the factors contributing to pilot success.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of a CDS system that ultimately did not progress to full-scale implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with clinicians, health service managers, and vendors involved in the pilot implementation and use of a mobile application-based CDS and a dashboard-based CDS in two departments (Emergency and Patient Flow) of a rural Australian hospital. A semi-structured interview guide was developed using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Sustainability, Scale-up, and Spread (NASSS) framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed four major themes: system performance and design, implementation processes, organisational support and resources, and perceived benefits of the CDS. The pilot implementation allowed for greater user input into the iterative design of CDS in practice, particularly in the Emergency Department, where clinicians had both the capacity and willingness to engage. However, technical issues encountered early in the pilot deterred many users who did not re-engage even after issues were resolved. Although some users remained engaged, they became frustrated as organisational resource constraints meant that critical issues impacting the CDS's clinical utility went unresolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful CDS pilots depend on the readiness of organisations, departments, and users to engage in pilot activities. Pilot implementations should be pursued in settings where users have both the capacity and willingness to participate in iterative feedback processes and where organisations have sufficient resources to address emerging needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2581-6236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2581-6236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Special Issue on CDS Failures: Opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of CDS systems: A qualitative study.
Background: Despite their potential, Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems often lack alignment with clinicians' needs and are underutilised in practice. Pilot implementations can help to improve the fit between systems and local needs by engaging users in real-world testing and refinement. Although pilot implementations of CDS have been reported, limited evidence has explored the factors contributing to pilot success.
Objectives: This study aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with the pilot implementation of a CDS system that ultimately did not progress to full-scale implementation.
Methods: We conducted interviews with clinicians, health service managers, and vendors involved in the pilot implementation and use of a mobile application-based CDS and a dashboard-based CDS in two departments (Emergency and Patient Flow) of a rural Australian hospital. A semi-structured interview guide was developed using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Sustainability, Scale-up, and Spread (NASSS) framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.
Results: Analysis revealed four major themes: system performance and design, implementation processes, organisational support and resources, and perceived benefits of the CDS. The pilot implementation allowed for greater user input into the iterative design of CDS in practice, particularly in the Emergency Department, where clinicians had both the capacity and willingness to engage. However, technical issues encountered early in the pilot deterred many users who did not re-engage even after issues were resolved. Although some users remained engaged, they became frustrated as organisational resource constraints meant that critical issues impacting the CDS's clinical utility went unresolved.
Conclusions: Successful CDS pilots depend on the readiness of organisations, departments, and users to engage in pilot activities. Pilot implementations should be pursued in settings where users have both the capacity and willingness to participate in iterative feedback processes and where organisations have sufficient resources to address emerging needs.
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.