伤口愈合率的物种间差异:灵长类动物和啮齿动物的比较研究。

IF 3.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Akiko Matsumoto-Oda, Daisuke Utsumi, Kenzo Takahashi, Satoshi Hirata, Atunga Nyachieo, Daniel Chai, Ngalla Jillani, Michel Raymond
{"title":"伤口愈合率的物种间差异:灵长类动物和啮齿动物的比较研究。","authors":"Akiko Matsumoto-Oda, Daisuke Utsumi, Kenzo Takahashi, Satoshi Hirata, Atunga Nyachieo, Daniel Chai, Ngalla Jillani, Michel Raymond","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2025.0233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Injuries, which affect survival and biological functioning, are common in the animal kingdom. This study systematically investigated whether the slow wound healing observed in humans is a unique characteristic within the primate order. First, we found no significant difference in wound-healing rates between baboons under experimental conditions and those in their natural environment (0.613 mm d<sup>-1</sup>). Second, comparisons among four non-human primates (velvet monkeys, Sykes' monkeys, baboons and chimpanzees) revealed no significant differences in wound-healing rates. Furthermore, these rates showed no significant differences compared to those observed in rodents, suggesting a potential commonality in wound-healing rates across diverse animal species. In contrast, human wound-healing rates were found to be markedly slower (0.25 mm d<sup>-1</sup>), approximately three times slower than those observed in non-human primates. This finding indicates that the slow wound healing observed in humans is not a common characteristic among primate order and highlights the possibility of evolutionary adaptations in humans. Understanding these inter-species differences in wound-healing rates may provide valuable insights into the evolutionary implications of wound healing. This study also underscores the need for further research into the biological processes underlying wound healing in various species.</p>","PeriodicalId":20589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"292 2045","pages":"20250233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-species differences in wound-healing rate: a comparative study involving primates and rodents.\",\"authors\":\"Akiko Matsumoto-Oda, Daisuke Utsumi, Kenzo Takahashi, Satoshi Hirata, Atunga Nyachieo, Daniel Chai, Ngalla Jillani, Michel Raymond\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rspb.2025.0233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Injuries, which affect survival and biological functioning, are common in the animal kingdom. This study systematically investigated whether the slow wound healing observed in humans is a unique characteristic within the primate order. First, we found no significant difference in wound-healing rates between baboons under experimental conditions and those in their natural environment (0.613 mm d<sup>-1</sup>). Second, comparisons among four non-human primates (velvet monkeys, Sykes' monkeys, baboons and chimpanzees) revealed no significant differences in wound-healing rates. Furthermore, these rates showed no significant differences compared to those observed in rodents, suggesting a potential commonality in wound-healing rates across diverse animal species. In contrast, human wound-healing rates were found to be markedly slower (0.25 mm d<sup>-1</sup>), approximately three times slower than those observed in non-human primates. This finding indicates that the slow wound healing observed in humans is not a common characteristic among primate order and highlights the possibility of evolutionary adaptations in humans. Understanding these inter-species differences in wound-healing rates may provide valuable insights into the evolutionary implications of wound healing. This study also underscores the need for further research into the biological processes underlying wound healing in various species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"292 2045\",\"pages\":\"20250233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040475/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.0233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.0233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伤害,影响生存和生物功能,是常见的动物王国。本研究系统地调查了在人类中观察到的伤口愈合缓慢是否是灵长类动物的独特特征。首先,我们发现实验条件下狒狒的伤口愈合率与自然环境下的狒狒没有显著差异(0.613 mm d-1)。其次,在四种非人类灵长类动物(天鹅绒猴、赛克斯猴、狒狒和黑猩猩)之间的比较显示,伤口愈合率没有显著差异。此外,与啮齿类动物相比,这些伤口愈合率没有显着差异,这表明不同动物物种的伤口愈合率可能具有共性。相比之下,人类的伤口愈合速度明显较慢(0.25 mm d-1),大约是非人灵长类动物的三倍。这一发现表明,在人类身上观察到的伤口愈合缓慢并不是灵长类动物的共同特征,并突出了人类进化适应的可能性。了解这些物种间伤口愈合率的差异可能为伤口愈合的进化意义提供有价值的见解。这项研究也强调了进一步研究不同物种伤口愈合的生物学过程的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inter-species differences in wound-healing rate: a comparative study involving primates and rodents.

Injuries, which affect survival and biological functioning, are common in the animal kingdom. This study systematically investigated whether the slow wound healing observed in humans is a unique characteristic within the primate order. First, we found no significant difference in wound-healing rates between baboons under experimental conditions and those in their natural environment (0.613 mm d-1). Second, comparisons among four non-human primates (velvet monkeys, Sykes' monkeys, baboons and chimpanzees) revealed no significant differences in wound-healing rates. Furthermore, these rates showed no significant differences compared to those observed in rodents, suggesting a potential commonality in wound-healing rates across diverse animal species. In contrast, human wound-healing rates were found to be markedly slower (0.25 mm d-1), approximately three times slower than those observed in non-human primates. This finding indicates that the slow wound healing observed in humans is not a common characteristic among primate order and highlights the possibility of evolutionary adaptations in humans. Understanding these inter-species differences in wound-healing rates may provide valuable insights into the evolutionary implications of wound healing. This study also underscores the need for further research into the biological processes underlying wound healing in various species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
502
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Proceedings B is the Royal Society’s flagship biological research journal, accepting original articles and reviews of outstanding scientific importance and broad general interest. The main criteria for acceptance are that a study is novel, and has general significance to biologists. Articles published cover a wide range of areas within the biological sciences, many have relevance to organisms and the environments in which they live. The scope includes, but is not limited to, ecology, evolution, behavior, health and disease epidemiology, neuroscience and cognition, behavioral genetics, development, biomechanics, paleontology, comparative biology, molecular ecology and evolution, and global change biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信