Jessica Lye, Reza Alinaghi-Zadeh, Sandie Fisher, Nikki Shelton, Glenn Cahoon, Leah McDermott, Richard Khor, Kym Rykers, Sweet Ping Ng
{"title":"腹部肿瘤内靶体积的影像学评价。","authors":"Jessica Lye, Reza Alinaghi-Zadeh, Sandie Fisher, Nikki Shelton, Glenn Cahoon, Leah McDermott, Richard Khor, Kym Rykers, Sweet Ping Ng","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The detailed anatomy visualization with magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy is particularly attractive for abdominal treatments, but patient respiratory motion can compromise image quality. The \"navigator technique\" produces high-quality 3D images, triggered by diaphragm displacement, in exhale phase only. The gold standard for planning is 4D imaging, which visualizes the lesion for all breathing phases. When 4D imaging is not available, an alternative is using 3D imaging combined with motion information from cine-MR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work investigates two alternative internal target volume (ITV) generation methods and compares them with the original treatment 4DCT imaging ITV. Datasets were analyzed from 10 upper abdominal patients that originally had been treated with a 4DCT-based ITV. In addition to the 4DCT, these patients received an exhale MR and cine-MR scans prior to treatment. An MR-CT-compatible motion phantom was also used to compare the two alternative ITV methods with the clinical 4DCT method. The first ITV method uses \"margins expansion\" (ME method) asymmetrically. The second method duplicates the exhale gross tumor volume (GTV) and shifts it to the positions of the average inhale GTV and mid-position GTV. The ITV is the \"Boolean combine\" (BC method) of the three displaced GTVs. The ME and BC methods were compared with the clinical 4DCT method using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) to determine the impact of approximating the true GTV trajectory and neglecting deformation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ITV DSC ranges were 73%-96% for the ME method and 76%96% for the BC method. The BC approach created smaller treatment volumes than the ME method and more closely resembled the 4DCT margin for cases with larger motion and a significant component in the anterior-posterior direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An exhale MR combined with cine-MR can be used to simply create an ITV for adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy. For small lesions with larger anterior motion, the Boolean Combine method is the more accurate method.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of internal target volume of abdominal tumors using cine-MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Lye, Reza Alinaghi-Zadeh, Sandie Fisher, Nikki Shelton, Glenn Cahoon, Leah McDermott, Richard Khor, Kym Rykers, Sweet Ping Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The detailed anatomy visualization with magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy is particularly attractive for abdominal treatments, but patient respiratory motion can compromise image quality. The \\\"navigator technique\\\" produces high-quality 3D images, triggered by diaphragm displacement, in exhale phase only. The gold standard for planning is 4D imaging, which visualizes the lesion for all breathing phases. When 4D imaging is not available, an alternative is using 3D imaging combined with motion information from cine-MR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work investigates two alternative internal target volume (ITV) generation methods and compares them with the original treatment 4DCT imaging ITV. Datasets were analyzed from 10 upper abdominal patients that originally had been treated with a 4DCT-based ITV. In addition to the 4DCT, these patients received an exhale MR and cine-MR scans prior to treatment. An MR-CT-compatible motion phantom was also used to compare the two alternative ITV methods with the clinical 4DCT method. The first ITV method uses \\\"margins expansion\\\" (ME method) asymmetrically. The second method duplicates the exhale gross tumor volume (GTV) and shifts it to the positions of the average inhale GTV and mid-position GTV. The ITV is the \\\"Boolean combine\\\" (BC method) of the three displaced GTVs. The ME and BC methods were compared with the clinical 4DCT method using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) to determine the impact of approximating the true GTV trajectory and neglecting deformation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ITV DSC ranges were 73%-96% for the ME method and 76%96% for the BC method. The BC approach created smaller treatment volumes than the ME method and more closely resembled the 4DCT margin for cases with larger motion and a significant component in the anterior-posterior direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An exhale MR combined with cine-MR can be used to simply create an ITV for adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy. For small lesions with larger anterior motion, the Boolean Combine method is the more accurate method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70097\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of internal target volume of abdominal tumors using cine-MRI.
Introduction: The detailed anatomy visualization with magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy is particularly attractive for abdominal treatments, but patient respiratory motion can compromise image quality. The "navigator technique" produces high-quality 3D images, triggered by diaphragm displacement, in exhale phase only. The gold standard for planning is 4D imaging, which visualizes the lesion for all breathing phases. When 4D imaging is not available, an alternative is using 3D imaging combined with motion information from cine-MR.
Methods: This work investigates two alternative internal target volume (ITV) generation methods and compares them with the original treatment 4DCT imaging ITV. Datasets were analyzed from 10 upper abdominal patients that originally had been treated with a 4DCT-based ITV. In addition to the 4DCT, these patients received an exhale MR and cine-MR scans prior to treatment. An MR-CT-compatible motion phantom was also used to compare the two alternative ITV methods with the clinical 4DCT method. The first ITV method uses "margins expansion" (ME method) asymmetrically. The second method duplicates the exhale gross tumor volume (GTV) and shifts it to the positions of the average inhale GTV and mid-position GTV. The ITV is the "Boolean combine" (BC method) of the three displaced GTVs. The ME and BC methods were compared with the clinical 4DCT method using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) to determine the impact of approximating the true GTV trajectory and neglecting deformation.
Results: The ITV DSC ranges were 73%-96% for the ME method and 76%96% for the BC method. The BC approach created smaller treatment volumes than the ME method and more closely resembled the 4DCT margin for cases with larger motion and a significant component in the anterior-posterior direction.
Conclusions: An exhale MR combined with cine-MR can be used to simply create an ITV for adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy. For small lesions with larger anterior motion, the Boolean Combine method is the more accurate method.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic