使用“趋势”一词来描述骨科文献中不重要结果的趋势。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00211
Patrick A Massey, Ryan Taylor, Robert W Rutz, Joshua Harris, Carver Montgomery, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan
{"title":"使用“趋势”一词来描述骨科文献中不重要结果的趋势。","authors":"Patrick A Massey, Ryan Taylor, Robert W Rutz, Joshua Harris, Carver Montgomery, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Use of the word \"trend\" for statistical judgment with no statistical significance has been recognized in multiple fields of medical literature. \"Trend\" is sometimes used to describe \"nearly significant\" findings when they are not statistically significant. The purpose of this study was to characterize the use of the word \"trend\" to describe nonsignificant findings in orthopaedic publications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthopaedic journals indexed in MEDLINE were identified using the terms: orthopedics OR orthopaedics OR sports medicine OR orthopedic OR orthopaedic. Abstracts from these journals that contained the word \"trend\" from 1985 to 2022 were identified. Journals containing literature on nonhuman orthopaedics were excluded. \"Trend\" used for statistical judgment without a p-value or with a nonsignificant p-value was labeled \"NS Trend\". Use of \"trend\" not in the context of statistical tests was labeled as \"dictionary usage\" of the word.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59,839 article abstracts were identified, with \"trend\" being used in 1,029 abstracts (1.7%). \"NS Trend\" was used in 617 abstracts (60%) to describe significant results when the p-value was not given or not actually significant. There was a strong correlation over time with increasing use of the word \"trend\" in orthopaedic abstracts (r = 0.956). An exponential rise in \"NS Trend\" usage was found (r = 0.924; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.853; p < 0.001). An exponential fit was confirmed using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p = 0.283).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The word \"trend\" is increasingly being used in orthopaedic literature, including suggesting statistical significance when absent. Misinterpretation of statistical analyses can lead to research conclusions that push readers toward inappropriate treatments. It is imperative that we clearly communicate our statistical findings and not use ambiguous language. The word \"trend\" should only be used to describe an actual trend analysis and not to imply statistical significance when none is present.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Trend to Use the Word \\\"Trend\\\" to Describe Nonsignificant Results in Orthopaedic Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick A Massey, Ryan Taylor, Robert W Rutz, Joshua Harris, Carver Montgomery, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Use of the word \\\"trend\\\" for statistical judgment with no statistical significance has been recognized in multiple fields of medical literature. \\\"Trend\\\" is sometimes used to describe \\\"nearly significant\\\" findings when they are not statistically significant. The purpose of this study was to characterize the use of the word \\\"trend\\\" to describe nonsignificant findings in orthopaedic publications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthopaedic journals indexed in MEDLINE were identified using the terms: orthopedics OR orthopaedics OR sports medicine OR orthopedic OR orthopaedic. Abstracts from these journals that contained the word \\\"trend\\\" from 1985 to 2022 were identified. Journals containing literature on nonhuman orthopaedics were excluded. \\\"Trend\\\" used for statistical judgment without a p-value or with a nonsignificant p-value was labeled \\\"NS Trend\\\". Use of \\\"trend\\\" not in the context of statistical tests was labeled as \\\"dictionary usage\\\" of the word.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59,839 article abstracts were identified, with \\\"trend\\\" being used in 1,029 abstracts (1.7%). \\\"NS Trend\\\" was used in 617 abstracts (60%) to describe significant results when the p-value was not given or not actually significant. There was a strong correlation over time with increasing use of the word \\\"trend\\\" in orthopaedic abstracts (r = 0.956). An exponential rise in \\\"NS Trend\\\" usage was found (r = 0.924; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.853; p < 0.001). An exponential fit was confirmed using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p = 0.283).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The word \\\"trend\\\" is increasingly being used in orthopaedic literature, including suggesting statistical significance when absent. Misinterpretation of statistical analyses can lead to research conclusions that push readers toward inappropriate treatments. It is imperative that we clearly communicate our statistical findings and not use ambiguous language. The word \\\"trend\\\" should only be used to describe an actual trend analysis and not to imply statistical significance when none is present.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:在医学文献的多个领域中,使用“趋势”一词进行无统计学意义的统计判断是公认的。“趋势”有时用来描述“接近显著”的发现,但这些发现在统计上并不显著。本研究的目的是描述骨科出版物中使用“趋势”一词来描述非显著发现的特征。方法:在MEDLINE检索骨科期刊时,使用以下术语进行检索:骨科或骨科或运动医学或骨科或骨科。这些期刊的摘要中包含1985年至2022年的“趋势”一词。包含非人类骨科文献的期刊被排除在外。对于没有p值或p值不显著的统计判断,将“Trend”标记为“NS Trend”。非在统计测试范围内使用“趋势”被标记为该词的“字典用法”。结果:共识别出59,839篇文章摘要,其中使用“trend”的有1,029篇(1.7%)。617篇(60%)摘要使用“NS趋势”来描述p值未给定或实际上不显著时的显著结果。随着时间的推移,骨科摘要中“趋势”一词的使用越来越频繁(r = 0.956)。“NS Trend”使用率呈指数增长(r = 0.924;R2 = 0.853;P < 0.001)。使用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验证实了指数拟合(p = 0.283)。结论:“趋势”一词在骨科文献中被越来越多地使用,包括在缺乏统计学意义的情况下提示统计学意义。对统计分析的误解可能导致研究结论,将读者推向不适当的处理方法。我们必须清楚地传达我们的统计结果,而不是使用模棱两可的语言。“趋势”这个词只应该用来描述实际的趋势分析,而不是在不存在统计意义的情况下暗示统计意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Trend to Use the Word "Trend" to Describe Nonsignificant Results in Orthopaedic Literature.

Introduction: Use of the word "trend" for statistical judgment with no statistical significance has been recognized in multiple fields of medical literature. "Trend" is sometimes used to describe "nearly significant" findings when they are not statistically significant. The purpose of this study was to characterize the use of the word "trend" to describe nonsignificant findings in orthopaedic publications.

Methods: Orthopaedic journals indexed in MEDLINE were identified using the terms: orthopedics OR orthopaedics OR sports medicine OR orthopedic OR orthopaedic. Abstracts from these journals that contained the word "trend" from 1985 to 2022 were identified. Journals containing literature on nonhuman orthopaedics were excluded. "Trend" used for statistical judgment without a p-value or with a nonsignificant p-value was labeled "NS Trend". Use of "trend" not in the context of statistical tests was labeled as "dictionary usage" of the word.

Results: A total of 59,839 article abstracts were identified, with "trend" being used in 1,029 abstracts (1.7%). "NS Trend" was used in 617 abstracts (60%) to describe significant results when the p-value was not given or not actually significant. There was a strong correlation over time with increasing use of the word "trend" in orthopaedic abstracts (r = 0.956). An exponential rise in "NS Trend" usage was found (r = 0.924; R2 = 0.853; p < 0.001). An exponential fit was confirmed using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p = 0.283).

Conclusion: The word "trend" is increasingly being used in orthopaedic literature, including suggesting statistical significance when absent. Misinterpretation of statistical analyses can lead to research conclusions that push readers toward inappropriate treatments. It is imperative that we clearly communicate our statistical findings and not use ambiguous language. The word "trend" should only be used to describe an actual trend analysis and not to imply statistical significance when none is present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信