{"title":"基于患者ct的二次电子轫致辐射成像用于质子治疗范围验证的模拟研究:与简化质子铅笔束和SOBP照射场景的提示伽马和PET成像的比较。","authors":"Takuya Yabe, Munetaka Nitta, Mitsutaka Yamaguchi, Marco Pinto, Naoki Kawachi, Katia Parodi","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/add4b7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Secondary electron bremsstrahlung (SEB) imaging, along with prompt gamma (PG) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, has been proposed as an<i>in vivo</i>range verification tool for proton therapy. This study presents the first simulation based on patient computed tomography (CT) data to investigate the feasibility of SEB imaging for range verification in proton therapy, while comparing the characteristics of SEB imaging with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Approach.</i>A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using patient CT data for the irradiation of monoenergetic pencil beams and spread-out Bragg peak proton beams. The physical characteristics of SEB imaging were analyzed at three different anatomical sites and compared with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Main results</i>. In all the treatment cases, SEB imaging exhibited higher production rates than PG and PET imaging, particularly in the regions with high CT values along the beam path. Although the SEB signal was more affected by scattering and absorption than the PET or PG signals, sufficient statistical counts for range verification (∼3 × 10<sup>-3</sup>SEBs/proton) could potentially be detected outside the patient geometry. For pencil beam cases, the SEB and PET fall-offs were located 4-5 mm proximal to the dose fall-off, while the PG fall-off was located 0-1 mm distal to it.<i>Significance.</i>Results suggest that SEB imaging has the potential to offer a real-time range verification tool (by comparing measured and expected images), particularly for treating shallow-seated tumors using proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. Thus, this study represents a significant step towards the clinical application of range verification based on SEB imaging and promotes future efforts in this direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient CT-based simulation study of secondary-electron-bremsstrahlung imaging for range verification in proton therapy: comparison with prompt gamma and PET imaging for simplified proton pencil beam and SOBP irradiation scenarios.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Yabe, Munetaka Nitta, Mitsutaka Yamaguchi, Marco Pinto, Naoki Kawachi, Katia Parodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/add4b7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Secondary electron bremsstrahlung (SEB) imaging, along with prompt gamma (PG) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, has been proposed as an<i>in vivo</i>range verification tool for proton therapy. This study presents the first simulation based on patient computed tomography (CT) data to investigate the feasibility of SEB imaging for range verification in proton therapy, while comparing the characteristics of SEB imaging with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Approach.</i>A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using patient CT data for the irradiation of monoenergetic pencil beams and spread-out Bragg peak proton beams. The physical characteristics of SEB imaging were analyzed at three different anatomical sites and compared with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Main results</i>. In all the treatment cases, SEB imaging exhibited higher production rates than PG and PET imaging, particularly in the regions with high CT values along the beam path. Although the SEB signal was more affected by scattering and absorption than the PET or PG signals, sufficient statistical counts for range verification (∼3 × 10<sup>-3</sup>SEBs/proton) could potentially be detected outside the patient geometry. For pencil beam cases, the SEB and PET fall-offs were located 4-5 mm proximal to the dose fall-off, while the PG fall-off was located 0-1 mm distal to it.<i>Significance.</i>Results suggest that SEB imaging has the potential to offer a real-time range verification tool (by comparing measured and expected images), particularly for treating shallow-seated tumors using proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. Thus, this study represents a significant step towards the clinical application of range verification based on SEB imaging and promotes future efforts in this direction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add4b7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add4b7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient CT-based simulation study of secondary-electron-bremsstrahlung imaging for range verification in proton therapy: comparison with prompt gamma and PET imaging for simplified proton pencil beam and SOBP irradiation scenarios.
Objective.Secondary electron bremsstrahlung (SEB) imaging, along with prompt gamma (PG) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, has been proposed as anin vivorange verification tool for proton therapy. This study presents the first simulation based on patient computed tomography (CT) data to investigate the feasibility of SEB imaging for range verification in proton therapy, while comparing the characteristics of SEB imaging with those of PG and PET imaging.Approach.A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using patient CT data for the irradiation of monoenergetic pencil beams and spread-out Bragg peak proton beams. The physical characteristics of SEB imaging were analyzed at three different anatomical sites and compared with those of PG and PET imaging.Main results. In all the treatment cases, SEB imaging exhibited higher production rates than PG and PET imaging, particularly in the regions with high CT values along the beam path. Although the SEB signal was more affected by scattering and absorption than the PET or PG signals, sufficient statistical counts for range verification (∼3 × 10-3SEBs/proton) could potentially be detected outside the patient geometry. For pencil beam cases, the SEB and PET fall-offs were located 4-5 mm proximal to the dose fall-off, while the PG fall-off was located 0-1 mm distal to it.Significance.Results suggest that SEB imaging has the potential to offer a real-time range verification tool (by comparing measured and expected images), particularly for treating shallow-seated tumors using proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. Thus, this study represents a significant step towards the clinical application of range verification based on SEB imaging and promotes future efforts in this direction.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry