[各种减肥干预后缝合失败和出血的治疗和预防]。

Q4 Medicine
A I Mitsinskaya, M A Mitsinsky, A D Akhmetov
{"title":"[各种减肥干预后缝合失败和出血的治疗和预防]。","authors":"A I Mitsinskaya, M A Mitsinsky, A D Akhmetov","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202505179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the incidence, treatment and prevention of leakage, as well as bleeding after various types of bariatric interventions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>There were 3.107 various bariatric interventions between 2020 and 2024 including 1.403 (45.2%) laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSG), 1.622 (52.2%) laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass procedures (MGB-OAGB) and 82 (2.6%) laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries (RYGB). The incidence of intraperitoneal and intraluminal bleeding, suture failure and incidence of complications depending on intraoperative prevention were evaluated. Efficacy of endoscopic VAC system (vacuum-assisted closure) for suture failure after LSG, MGB-OAGB and RYGB was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall complication rate between 2020 and 2024 was 1.64% (51 patients), suture failure - 0.45% (14 patients), bleeding - 0.71% (22) cases. Ten (71.4%) patients with suture failure were treated using VAC system. In 9 patients, the defect recovered without external gastric fistula. In 5 patients, defect closure was primary, in 4 patients - secondary, i.e. through ulcerative defect. In 1 patient after LSG, the defect did not heal despite VAC therapy for 21 days, and external gastric fistula occurred. Double treatment of stapler line for prevention of postoperative bleeding and leakage reduced the incidence of leaks by 2.5 times, intra-abdominal bleeding by 23 times, intraluminal bleeding from 0.95% to 0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic VAC system is effective for suture failure after bariatric interventions. Double treatment of stapler suture line can significantly reduce the incidence of bleeding and leakage after LSG, MGB-OAGB and RYGB.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 5","pages":"79-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Treatment and prevention of suture failure and bleeding after various bariatric interventions].\",\"authors\":\"A I Mitsinskaya, M A Mitsinsky, A D Akhmetov\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/hirurgia202505179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the incidence, treatment and prevention of leakage, as well as bleeding after various types of bariatric interventions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>There were 3.107 various bariatric interventions between 2020 and 2024 including 1.403 (45.2%) laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSG), 1.622 (52.2%) laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass procedures (MGB-OAGB) and 82 (2.6%) laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries (RYGB). The incidence of intraperitoneal and intraluminal bleeding, suture failure and incidence of complications depending on intraoperative prevention were evaluated. Efficacy of endoscopic VAC system (vacuum-assisted closure) for suture failure after LSG, MGB-OAGB and RYGB was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall complication rate between 2020 and 2024 was 1.64% (51 patients), suture failure - 0.45% (14 patients), bleeding - 0.71% (22) cases. Ten (71.4%) patients with suture failure were treated using VAC system. In 9 patients, the defect recovered without external gastric fistula. In 5 patients, defect closure was primary, in 4 patients - secondary, i.e. through ulcerative defect. In 1 patient after LSG, the defect did not heal despite VAC therapy for 21 days, and external gastric fistula occurred. Double treatment of stapler line for prevention of postoperative bleeding and leakage reduced the incidence of leaks by 2.5 times, intra-abdominal bleeding by 23 times, intraluminal bleeding from 0.95% to 0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic VAC system is effective for suture failure after bariatric interventions. Double treatment of stapler suture line can significantly reduce the incidence of bleeding and leakage after LSG, MGB-OAGB and RYGB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"79-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202505179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202505179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨各种减肥干预措施后渗漏、出血的发生率、治疗及预防。材料与方法:2020年至2024年,共有3.107例各种减肥干预措施,其中腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG) 1.403例(45.2%),腹腔镜小/单吻合式胃旁路手术(MGB-OAGB) 1.622例(52.2%),腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术(RYGB) 82例(2.6%)。评估术中预防的腹腔和腔内出血发生率、缝合失败及并发症发生率。评价内镜下真空辅助缝合系统(VAC)对LSG、MGB-OAGB和RYGB术后缝合失败的疗效。结果:2020 - 2024年总并发症发生率为1.64%(51例),缝合失败发生率为0.45%(14例),出血发生率为0.71%(22例)。10例(71.4%)缝合失败患者采用VAC系统治疗。其中9例恢复后无胃外瘘。在5例患者中,缺损闭合是原发性的,在4例患者中是继发性的,即通过溃疡性缺损。1例患者行LSG治疗21天后,缺损仍未愈合,并发生胃外瘘。吻合器线双重处理预防术后出血和漏出,漏出发生率降低2.5倍,腹腔内出血发生率降低23倍,腔内出血发生率由0.95%降低至0%。结论:内镜下真空通气系统是治疗减肥手术后缝合失败的有效方法。吻合器缝合线双重处理可显著降低LSG、MGB-OAGB和RYGB术后出血和渗漏的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Treatment and prevention of suture failure and bleeding after various bariatric interventions].

Objective: To assess the incidence, treatment and prevention of leakage, as well as bleeding after various types of bariatric interventions.

Material and methods: There were 3.107 various bariatric interventions between 2020 and 2024 including 1.403 (45.2%) laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSG), 1.622 (52.2%) laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass procedures (MGB-OAGB) and 82 (2.6%) laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries (RYGB). The incidence of intraperitoneal and intraluminal bleeding, suture failure and incidence of complications depending on intraoperative prevention were evaluated. Efficacy of endoscopic VAC system (vacuum-assisted closure) for suture failure after LSG, MGB-OAGB and RYGB was evaluated.

Results: The overall complication rate between 2020 and 2024 was 1.64% (51 patients), suture failure - 0.45% (14 patients), bleeding - 0.71% (22) cases. Ten (71.4%) patients with suture failure were treated using VAC system. In 9 patients, the defect recovered without external gastric fistula. In 5 patients, defect closure was primary, in 4 patients - secondary, i.e. through ulcerative defect. In 1 patient after LSG, the defect did not heal despite VAC therapy for 21 days, and external gastric fistula occurred. Double treatment of stapler line for prevention of postoperative bleeding and leakage reduced the incidence of leaks by 2.5 times, intra-abdominal bleeding by 23 times, intraluminal bleeding from 0.95% to 0%.

Conclusion: Endoscopic VAC system is effective for suture failure after bariatric interventions. Double treatment of stapler suture line can significantly reduce the incidence of bleeding and leakage after LSG, MGB-OAGB and RYGB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Khirurgiya
Khirurgiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Хирургия отдельных областей сердце, сосуды легкие пищевод молочная железа желудок и двенадцатиперстная кишка кишечник желчевыводящие пути печень
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信