Allison Choe, Emily M Fredericks, Dana Albright, Joyce M Lee, Julie M Sturza, Hurley O Riley, Niko Kaciroti, Katherine W Bauer, Alison L Miller
{"title":"青少年1型糖尿病患者的执行功能、糖尿病困扰和糖尿病管理:青少年和父母的观点。","authors":"Allison Choe, Emily M Fredericks, Dana Albright, Joyce M Lee, Julie M Sturza, Hurley O Riley, Niko Kaciroti, Katherine W Bauer, Alison L Miller","doi":"10.1155/pedi/7036544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Most adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) do not achieve recommended glycemic targets, placing them at risk for long-term complications. Executive functioning (EF), or the cognitive processes that support goal-directed action and management of behavior, emotion, and cognition, is proposed to support effective T1D management and contribute to glycemic stability. We sought to examine associations of EF with T1D management behaviors and diabetes-related distress in adolescents with T1D. <b>Methods:</b> Participants were 13-17-year-olds (<i>M</i> = 15.44, <i>SD</i> = 1.38 years) from a randomized controlled trial (<i>N</i> = 88). We conducted secondary analyses of preintervention data. Youth and their parents each reported on youth EF (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning; BRIEF) and T1D management behaviors (Self-Care Inventory-Revised; SCI-R), parents reported on responsibility for T1D management (Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire; DFRQ), and youth reported on their diabetes-related distress (Problem Areas In Diabetes-Teen; PAID-T). Youth also completed performance-based measures of EF. <b>Results:</b> Questionnaire-based and performance-based EF measures were generally unrelated. Regression analysis showed that youth self-reported EF predicted youth-reported T1D management (SCI-R) and diabetes distress (PAID-T) outcomes, and parent-reported youth EF predicted parent-reported T1D management behaviors, such that greater EF difficulties predicted suboptimal management and greater diabetes-related distress (youth PAID-T <i>β</i>: 0.41, <i>p</i> < 0.01; youth SCI-R <i>β</i>: -0.40, <i>p</i> < 0.01; parent SCI-R <i>β:</i> -0.33, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Older child age and poorer performance-based EF also predicted greater youth responsibility for T1D management (age <i>β</i>: 0.43,<i>p</i> < 0.01; EF reaction time <i>β</i>: 0.23,<i>p</i> < 0.05; EF accuracy <i>β</i>: -0.23, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Youth EF may shape which adolescents are at increased risk for suboptimal T1D management as well as diabetes distress; understanding EF challenges may help guide T1D family management across this developmental period. Implications for EF measurement approaches in youth are also discussed. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03688919.</p>","PeriodicalId":19797,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Diabetes","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7036544"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive Functioning, Diabetes Distress, and Diabetes Management Among Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Youth and Parent Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Allison Choe, Emily M Fredericks, Dana Albright, Joyce M Lee, Julie M Sturza, Hurley O Riley, Niko Kaciroti, Katherine W Bauer, Alison L Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/pedi/7036544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Most adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) do not achieve recommended glycemic targets, placing them at risk for long-term complications. Executive functioning (EF), or the cognitive processes that support goal-directed action and management of behavior, emotion, and cognition, is proposed to support effective T1D management and contribute to glycemic stability. We sought to examine associations of EF with T1D management behaviors and diabetes-related distress in adolescents with T1D. <b>Methods:</b> Participants were 13-17-year-olds (<i>M</i> = 15.44, <i>SD</i> = 1.38 years) from a randomized controlled trial (<i>N</i> = 88). We conducted secondary analyses of preintervention data. Youth and their parents each reported on youth EF (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning; BRIEF) and T1D management behaviors (Self-Care Inventory-Revised; SCI-R), parents reported on responsibility for T1D management (Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire; DFRQ), and youth reported on their diabetes-related distress (Problem Areas In Diabetes-Teen; PAID-T). Youth also completed performance-based measures of EF. <b>Results:</b> Questionnaire-based and performance-based EF measures were generally unrelated. Regression analysis showed that youth self-reported EF predicted youth-reported T1D management (SCI-R) and diabetes distress (PAID-T) outcomes, and parent-reported youth EF predicted parent-reported T1D management behaviors, such that greater EF difficulties predicted suboptimal management and greater diabetes-related distress (youth PAID-T <i>β</i>: 0.41, <i>p</i> < 0.01; youth SCI-R <i>β</i>: -0.40, <i>p</i> < 0.01; parent SCI-R <i>β:</i> -0.33, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Older child age and poorer performance-based EF also predicted greater youth responsibility for T1D management (age <i>β</i>: 0.43,<i>p</i> < 0.01; EF reaction time <i>β</i>: 0.23,<i>p</i> < 0.05; EF accuracy <i>β</i>: -0.23, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Youth EF may shape which adolescents are at increased risk for suboptimal T1D management as well as diabetes distress; understanding EF challenges may help guide T1D family management across this developmental period. Implications for EF measurement approaches in youth are also discussed. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03688919.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"7036544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/pedi/7036544\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/pedi/7036544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:大多数青少年1型糖尿病(T1D)没有达到推荐的血糖目标,使他们面临长期并发症的风险。执行功能(EF),或支持目标导向的行动和行为、情绪和认知管理的认知过程,被认为支持有效的T1D管理并有助于血糖稳定。我们试图研究EF与青少年T1D管理行为和糖尿病相关困扰的关系。方法:随机对照试验(N = 88),参与者为13-17岁,M = 15.44, SD = 1.38岁。我们对干预前的数据进行了二次分析。青少年及其父母分别报告了青少年EF(执行功能行为评定量表);BRIEF)和T1D管理行为(自我护理清单-修订;SCI-R),家长对T1D管理责任的报告(糖尿病家庭责任问卷;DFRQ),青少年报告了他们与糖尿病相关的困扰(糖尿病问题领域-青少年;付了)。青少年还完成了基于绩效的EF测试。结果:基于问卷和基于绩效的EF测量通常不相关。回归分析显示,青少年自我报告的EF可以预测青少年报告的T1D管理(SCI-R)和糖尿病困扰(pay - t)结果,父母报告的青少年EF可以预测父母报告的T1D管理行为,因此,越大的EF困难预测次优管理和越大的糖尿病相关困扰(youth pay - t β: 0.41, p < 0.01;青少年SCI-R β: -0.40, p < 0.01;亲本SCI-R β: -0.33, p < 0.01)。较大的儿童年龄和较差的绩效EF也预示着青少年对T1D管理的责任更大(年龄β: 0.43,p < 0.01;EF反应时间β: 0.23,p < 0.05;EF精度β: -0.23, p < 0.05)。结论:青少年EF可能决定了哪些青少年的T1D管理不佳以及糖尿病困扰的风险增加;了解EF的挑战可能有助于指导T1D家庭在这一发展时期的管理。对青少年EF测量方法的意义也进行了讨论。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03688919。
Executive Functioning, Diabetes Distress, and Diabetes Management Among Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Youth and Parent Perspectives.
Objective: Most adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) do not achieve recommended glycemic targets, placing them at risk for long-term complications. Executive functioning (EF), or the cognitive processes that support goal-directed action and management of behavior, emotion, and cognition, is proposed to support effective T1D management and contribute to glycemic stability. We sought to examine associations of EF with T1D management behaviors and diabetes-related distress in adolescents with T1D. Methods: Participants were 13-17-year-olds (M = 15.44, SD = 1.38 years) from a randomized controlled trial (N = 88). We conducted secondary analyses of preintervention data. Youth and their parents each reported on youth EF (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning; BRIEF) and T1D management behaviors (Self-Care Inventory-Revised; SCI-R), parents reported on responsibility for T1D management (Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire; DFRQ), and youth reported on their diabetes-related distress (Problem Areas In Diabetes-Teen; PAID-T). Youth also completed performance-based measures of EF. Results: Questionnaire-based and performance-based EF measures were generally unrelated. Regression analysis showed that youth self-reported EF predicted youth-reported T1D management (SCI-R) and diabetes distress (PAID-T) outcomes, and parent-reported youth EF predicted parent-reported T1D management behaviors, such that greater EF difficulties predicted suboptimal management and greater diabetes-related distress (youth PAID-T β: 0.41, p < 0.01; youth SCI-R β: -0.40, p < 0.01; parent SCI-R β: -0.33, p < 0.01). Older child age and poorer performance-based EF also predicted greater youth responsibility for T1D management (age β: 0.43,p < 0.01; EF reaction time β: 0.23,p < 0.05; EF accuracy β: -0.23, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Youth EF may shape which adolescents are at increased risk for suboptimal T1D management as well as diabetes distress; understanding EF challenges may help guide T1D family management across this developmental period. Implications for EF measurement approaches in youth are also discussed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03688919.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Diabetes is a bi-monthly journal devoted to disseminating new knowledge relating to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes in childhood and adolescence. The aim of the journal is to become the leading vehicle for international dissemination of research and practice relating to diabetes in youth. Papers are considered for publication based on the rigor of scientific approach, novelty, and importance for understanding mechanisms involved in the epidemiology and etiology of this disease, especially its molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects. Work relating to the clinical presentation, course, management and outcome of diabetes, including its physical and emotional sequelae, is considered. In vitro studies using animal or human tissues, whole animal and clinical studies in humans are also considered. The journal reviews full-length papers, preliminary communications with important new information, clinical reports, and reviews of major topics. Invited editorials, commentaries, and perspectives are a regular feature. The editors, based in the USA, Europe, and Australasia, maintain regular communications to assure rapid turnaround time of submitted manuscripts.