{"title":"迈向下一代物种划分方法:机器学习应用概述。","authors":"Matheus M.A. Salles, Fabricius M.C.B. Domingos","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2025.108368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Species delimitation is the process of distinguishing between populations of the same species and distinct species of a particular group of organisms. Various methods exist for inferring species limits, whether based on morphological, molecular, or other types of data. In the case of methods based on DNA sequences, most of them are rooted in the coalescent theory. However, coalescence-based models have limitations, for instance regarding complex evolutionary scenarios and large datasets. In this context, machine learning (ML) can be considered as a promising analytical tool, and provides an effective way to explore dataset structures when species-level divergences are hypothesized. In this review, we examine the use of ML in species delimitation and provide an overview and critical appraisal of existing workflows. We also provide simple explanations on how the main types of ML approaches operate, which should help uninitiated researchers and students interested in the field. Our review suggests that while current ML methods designed to infer species limits are analytically powerful, they also present specific limitations and should not be considered as definitive alternatives to coalescent methods for species delimitation. Future ML enterprises to delimit species should consider the constraints related to the use of simulated data, as in other model-based methods relying on simulations. Conversely, the flexibility of ML algorithms offers a significant advantage by enabling the analysis of diverse data types (e.g., genetic and phenotypic) and handling large datasets effectively. We also propose best practices for the use of ML methods in species delimitation, offering insights into potential future applications. We expect that the proposed guidelines will be useful for enhancing the accessibility, effectiveness, and objectivity of ML in species delimitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56109,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 108368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the next generation of species delimitation methods: an overview of machine learning applications\",\"authors\":\"Matheus M.A. Salles, Fabricius M.C.B. Domingos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ympev.2025.108368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Species delimitation is the process of distinguishing between populations of the same species and distinct species of a particular group of organisms. Various methods exist for inferring species limits, whether based on morphological, molecular, or other types of data. In the case of methods based on DNA sequences, most of them are rooted in the coalescent theory. However, coalescence-based models have limitations, for instance regarding complex evolutionary scenarios and large datasets. In this context, machine learning (ML) can be considered as a promising analytical tool, and provides an effective way to explore dataset structures when species-level divergences are hypothesized. In this review, we examine the use of ML in species delimitation and provide an overview and critical appraisal of existing workflows. We also provide simple explanations on how the main types of ML approaches operate, which should help uninitiated researchers and students interested in the field. Our review suggests that while current ML methods designed to infer species limits are analytically powerful, they also present specific limitations and should not be considered as definitive alternatives to coalescent methods for species delimitation. Future ML enterprises to delimit species should consider the constraints related to the use of simulated data, as in other model-based methods relying on simulations. Conversely, the flexibility of ML algorithms offers a significant advantage by enabling the analysis of diverse data types (e.g., genetic and phenotypic) and handling large datasets effectively. We also propose best practices for the use of ML methods in species delimitation, offering insights into potential future applications. We expect that the proposed guidelines will be useful for enhancing the accessibility, effectiveness, and objectivity of ML in species delimitation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790325000855\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790325000855","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards the next generation of species delimitation methods: an overview of machine learning applications
Species delimitation is the process of distinguishing between populations of the same species and distinct species of a particular group of organisms. Various methods exist for inferring species limits, whether based on morphological, molecular, or other types of data. In the case of methods based on DNA sequences, most of them are rooted in the coalescent theory. However, coalescence-based models have limitations, for instance regarding complex evolutionary scenarios and large datasets. In this context, machine learning (ML) can be considered as a promising analytical tool, and provides an effective way to explore dataset structures when species-level divergences are hypothesized. In this review, we examine the use of ML in species delimitation and provide an overview and critical appraisal of existing workflows. We also provide simple explanations on how the main types of ML approaches operate, which should help uninitiated researchers and students interested in the field. Our review suggests that while current ML methods designed to infer species limits are analytically powerful, they also present specific limitations and should not be considered as definitive alternatives to coalescent methods for species delimitation. Future ML enterprises to delimit species should consider the constraints related to the use of simulated data, as in other model-based methods relying on simulations. Conversely, the flexibility of ML algorithms offers a significant advantage by enabling the analysis of diverse data types (e.g., genetic and phenotypic) and handling large datasets effectively. We also propose best practices for the use of ML methods in species delimitation, offering insights into potential future applications. We expect that the proposed guidelines will be useful for enhancing the accessibility, effectiveness, and objectivity of ML in species delimitation.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution is dedicated to bringing Darwin''s dream within grasp - to "have fairly true genealogical trees of each great kingdom of Nature." The journal provides a forum for molecular studies that advance our understanding of phylogeny and evolution, further the development of phylogenetically more accurate taxonomic classifications, and ultimately bring a unified classification for all the ramifying lines of life. Phylogeographic studies will be considered for publication if they offer EXCEPTIONAL theoretical or empirical advances.