捷克版背痛态度问卷:跨文化适应与测量性质分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Tomas Kavka, Tomas Nedoma, Zuzana Blahova, Ben Darlow
{"title":"捷克版背痛态度问卷:跨文化适应与测量性质分析。","authors":"Tomas Kavka, Tomas Nedoma, Zuzana Blahova, Ben Darlow","doi":"10.1177/10538127251336219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAssessing attitudes and beliefs regarding low back pain is an integral component of a person-centered biopsychosocial approach to care.ObjectivesThis study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of both the full 34-item version and its shortened versions.MethodsFollowing recommended guidelines, cross-cultural adaptation process included forward and back translation, expert committee review, and pretesting using Three-Step Test-Interview. The psychometric properties evaluation involved physiotherapists and members of the general public, both with and without low back pain. Factor structure was analyzed using Principal Component Analysis, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe Back-PAQ was translated and culturally adapted to Czech (Back-PAQ-CZ). Five hundred and thirty-nine participants (299 physiotherapists; 240 members of general public) were included for the analysis. No meaningful factor structure was found for the 34-item Back-PAQ-CZ. However, a meaningful factor structure and acceptable Internal Consistency were found for the 10-item and 8-item versions. The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.94), good (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.87) and moderate to good (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.76) for the 34-, 10- and 8-item version, respectively.ConclusionsThe Back-PAQ-CZ and its shortened versions should only be used with an awareness of identified limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251336219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Czech version of the back pain attitudes questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tomas Kavka, Tomas Nedoma, Zuzana Blahova, Ben Darlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251336219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAssessing attitudes and beliefs regarding low back pain is an integral component of a person-centered biopsychosocial approach to care.ObjectivesThis study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of both the full 34-item version and its shortened versions.MethodsFollowing recommended guidelines, cross-cultural adaptation process included forward and back translation, expert committee review, and pretesting using Three-Step Test-Interview. The psychometric properties evaluation involved physiotherapists and members of the general public, both with and without low back pain. Factor structure was analyzed using Principal Component Analysis, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe Back-PAQ was translated and culturally adapted to Czech (Back-PAQ-CZ). Five hundred and thirty-nine participants (299 physiotherapists; 240 members of general public) were included for the analysis. No meaningful factor structure was found for the 34-item Back-PAQ-CZ. However, a meaningful factor structure and acceptable Internal Consistency were found for the 10-item and 8-item versions. The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.94), good (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.87) and moderate to good (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.76) for the 34-, 10- and 8-item version, respectively.ConclusionsThe Back-PAQ-CZ and its shortened versions should only be used with an awareness of identified limitations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251336219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251336219\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251336219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景评估关于腰痛的态度和信念是以人为本的生物心理社会护理方法的一个组成部分。目的对《背部疼痛态度问卷》(Back- paq)进行翻译和跨文化改编,并对完整版和精简版的心理测量学特性进行评价。方法跨文化适应过程包括前后翻译、专家委员会评审和三步测试-访谈预测。心理测量特性评估涉及物理治疗师和普通公众,有和没有腰痛。采用主成分分析分析因子结构,采用Cronbach’s α评价内部一致性,采用类内相关系数(Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC)衡量重测信度。结果Back-PAQ被翻译成捷克语并进行文化改编(Back-PAQ- cz)。539名参与者(299名物理治疗师;240名普通市民被纳入分析。34项Back-PAQ-CZ未发现有意义的因子结构。然而,10项和8项版本存在有意义的因子结构和可接受的内部一致性。34项版本、10项版本和8项版本的重测信度分别为优秀(ICC2,1 = 0.94)、良好(ICC2,1 = 0.87)和中至良好(ICC2,1 = 0.76)。结论Back-PAQ-CZ及其简写版本在使用时应明确其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Czech version of the back pain attitudes questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties analysis.

BackgroundAssessing attitudes and beliefs regarding low back pain is an integral component of a person-centered biopsychosocial approach to care.ObjectivesThis study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of both the full 34-item version and its shortened versions.MethodsFollowing recommended guidelines, cross-cultural adaptation process included forward and back translation, expert committee review, and pretesting using Three-Step Test-Interview. The psychometric properties evaluation involved physiotherapists and members of the general public, both with and without low back pain. Factor structure was analyzed using Principal Component Analysis, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe Back-PAQ was translated and culturally adapted to Czech (Back-PAQ-CZ). Five hundred and thirty-nine participants (299 physiotherapists; 240 members of general public) were included for the analysis. No meaningful factor structure was found for the 34-item Back-PAQ-CZ. However, a meaningful factor structure and acceptable Internal Consistency were found for the 10-item and 8-item versions. The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC2,1 = 0.94), good (ICC2,1 = 0.87) and moderate to good (ICC2,1 = 0.76) for the 34-, 10- and 8-item version, respectively.ConclusionsThe Back-PAQ-CZ and its shortened versions should only be used with an awareness of identified limitations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信