中年妇女中风的日常歧视和亚临床指标。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jennifer B Wells, Natalie Egnot, Emma Barinas-Mitchell, Maria M Brooks, Dara D Mendez, Rebecca C Thurston
{"title":"中年妇女中风的日常歧视和亚临床指标。","authors":"Jennifer B Wells, Natalie Egnot, Emma Barinas-Mitchell, Maria M Brooks, Dara D Mendez, Rebecca C Thurston","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00568-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disparities between Black and White women in stroke risk in the United States are present during midlife, a period during which subclinical indicators of stroke risk accelerate in women. Racism and forms of discrimination have long been associated with cardiovascular pathophysiology. However, few studies have examined midlife discrimination among women and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, a strong predictor of stroke and myocardial infarction. The Everyday Discrimination Scale, which measures discriminatory experiences, was administered to 304 (including 120 White and 76 Black) midlife women (mean age = 54, SD = 3.9) free of clinical cardiovascular disease. At the same visit, using ultrasonography, we measured four markers of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, including plaque count, grey scale median, and maximum plaque height. The majority (85%) of women experienced at least one form of discrimination in their daily life. Black women reported experiencing greater discrimination than White women with a mean (SD) Everyday Discrimination Score of 7.3 (5.2) versus 5.7 (4.3). These experiences were most attributed to race, age, income, and \"other.\" Black participants had a higher prevalence of carotid plaque compared to White participants (52% versus 46%). Using Poisson regression, higher discrimination was associated with higher plaque count among Black women only, adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and education, such that one standard deviation increase in the Everyday Discrimination Scale was associated with a 25% higher plaque count. Further adjusting for financial strain did not reduce the effect size. We did not observe an association between discrimination and other carotid plaque measures in Black or White women. In Black women, higher levels of discrimination was associated with greater carotid atherosclerosis. Clarifying the relationship between discrimination and subclinical indicators of stroke risk could inform social and healthcare interventions to reduce discrimination and potential associated stroke risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Everyday discrimination and subclinical indicators of stroke in midlife women.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer B Wells, Natalie Egnot, Emma Barinas-Mitchell, Maria M Brooks, Dara D Mendez, Rebecca C Thurston\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10865-025-00568-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Disparities between Black and White women in stroke risk in the United States are present during midlife, a period during which subclinical indicators of stroke risk accelerate in women. Racism and forms of discrimination have long been associated with cardiovascular pathophysiology. However, few studies have examined midlife discrimination among women and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, a strong predictor of stroke and myocardial infarction. The Everyday Discrimination Scale, which measures discriminatory experiences, was administered to 304 (including 120 White and 76 Black) midlife women (mean age = 54, SD = 3.9) free of clinical cardiovascular disease. At the same visit, using ultrasonography, we measured four markers of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, including plaque count, grey scale median, and maximum plaque height. The majority (85%) of women experienced at least one form of discrimination in their daily life. Black women reported experiencing greater discrimination than White women with a mean (SD) Everyday Discrimination Score of 7.3 (5.2) versus 5.7 (4.3). These experiences were most attributed to race, age, income, and \\\"other.\\\" Black participants had a higher prevalence of carotid plaque compared to White participants (52% versus 46%). Using Poisson regression, higher discrimination was associated with higher plaque count among Black women only, adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and education, such that one standard deviation increase in the Everyday Discrimination Scale was associated with a 25% higher plaque count. Further adjusting for financial strain did not reduce the effect size. We did not observe an association between discrimination and other carotid plaque measures in Black or White women. In Black women, higher levels of discrimination was associated with greater carotid atherosclerosis. Clarifying the relationship between discrimination and subclinical indicators of stroke risk could inform social and healthcare interventions to reduce discrimination and potential associated stroke risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00568-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00568-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,黑人和白人女性在中年中风风险方面存在差异,这一时期女性中风风险的亚临床指标加速上升。长期以来,种族主义和各种形式的歧视一直与心血管病理生理学有关。然而,很少有研究调查女性中年歧视与亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化之间的关系,而亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化是中风和心肌梗死的有力预测因子。测量歧视经历的日常歧视量表对304名(包括120名白人和76名黑人)无临床心血管疾病的中年妇女(平均年龄= 54岁,SD = 3.9)进行了调查。在同一次访问中,使用超声检查,我们测量了亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化的四种标志物,包括斑块计数、灰度中位数和最大斑块高度。大多数(85%)妇女在日常生活中至少经历过一种形式的歧视。黑人女性比白人女性遭受更大的歧视,平均(SD)每日歧视得分为7.3(5.2)比5.7(4.3)。这些经历主要归因于种族、年龄、收入和“其他”。与白人受试者相比,黑人受试者颈动脉斑块患病率更高(52%对46%)。使用泊松回归,在年龄、收缩压、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和受教育程度等因素调整后,只有黑人女性中,较高的歧视与较高的斑块计数相关,因此,每日歧视量表的一个标准差增加与斑块计数增加25%相关。进一步调整财政压力并没有降低效应量。在黑人或白人女性中,我们没有观察到歧视与其他颈动脉斑块测量之间的关联。在黑人女性中,歧视程度越高,颈动脉粥样硬化程度越高。澄清歧视与卒中风险亚临床指标之间的关系可以为社会和医疗干预提供信息,以减少歧视和潜在的相关卒中风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Everyday discrimination and subclinical indicators of stroke in midlife women.

Disparities between Black and White women in stroke risk in the United States are present during midlife, a period during which subclinical indicators of stroke risk accelerate in women. Racism and forms of discrimination have long been associated with cardiovascular pathophysiology. However, few studies have examined midlife discrimination among women and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, a strong predictor of stroke and myocardial infarction. The Everyday Discrimination Scale, which measures discriminatory experiences, was administered to 304 (including 120 White and 76 Black) midlife women (mean age = 54, SD = 3.9) free of clinical cardiovascular disease. At the same visit, using ultrasonography, we measured four markers of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, including plaque count, grey scale median, and maximum plaque height. The majority (85%) of women experienced at least one form of discrimination in their daily life. Black women reported experiencing greater discrimination than White women with a mean (SD) Everyday Discrimination Score of 7.3 (5.2) versus 5.7 (4.3). These experiences were most attributed to race, age, income, and "other." Black participants had a higher prevalence of carotid plaque compared to White participants (52% versus 46%). Using Poisson regression, higher discrimination was associated with higher plaque count among Black women only, adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and education, such that one standard deviation increase in the Everyday Discrimination Scale was associated with a 25% higher plaque count. Further adjusting for financial strain did not reduce the effect size. We did not observe an association between discrimination and other carotid plaque measures in Black or White women. In Black women, higher levels of discrimination was associated with greater carotid atherosclerosis. Clarifying the relationship between discrimination and subclinical indicators of stroke risk could inform social and healthcare interventions to reduce discrimination and potential associated stroke risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信