Brahman Shankar Sivakumar, Lianne Bissell, Mark Hile, Elizabeth Clarke
{"title":"单皮质与双皮质螺钉在指骨骨折背钢板内固定中的应用。","authors":"Brahman Shankar Sivakumar, Lianne Bissell, Mark Hile, Elizabeth Clarke","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare unicortical and bicortical screw fixation for dorsal plating of extra-articular proximal phalangeal fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Midshaft osteotomies were performed on 21 cadaveric proximal phalanges. The phalanges were fixed via dorsal plating using either unicortical or bicortical locking screws and subjected to a three-point bending test. Cyclical loading was performed, increasing displacement by 0.4 mm every block of five cycles, until construct failure. Clinical failure was defined as 2 mm of displacement. Data collected included maximal force at failure, force at clinical failure, number of cycles to failure, and displacement to failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar values were noted in maximal force at clinical failure and biomechanical failure, number of cycles to failure, and displacement to failure between phalanges fixed using unicortical or bicortical locking screws.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both unicortical and bicortical locking screws provide sufficient stability to facilitate early motion without risk of clinically relevant displacement during plate fixation of midshaft proximal phalangeal fractures.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Unicortical dorsal plate-screw constructs should be considered, where appropriate, to prevent tendon injury or complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unicortical Versus Bicortical Screws for Dorsal Plate Fixation of Phalangeal Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Brahman Shankar Sivakumar, Lianne Bissell, Mark Hile, Elizabeth Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare unicortical and bicortical screw fixation for dorsal plating of extra-articular proximal phalangeal fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Midshaft osteotomies were performed on 21 cadaveric proximal phalanges. The phalanges were fixed via dorsal plating using either unicortical or bicortical locking screws and subjected to a three-point bending test. Cyclical loading was performed, increasing displacement by 0.4 mm every block of five cycles, until construct failure. Clinical failure was defined as 2 mm of displacement. Data collected included maximal force at failure, force at clinical failure, number of cycles to failure, and displacement to failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar values were noted in maximal force at clinical failure and biomechanical failure, number of cycles to failure, and displacement to failure between phalanges fixed using unicortical or bicortical locking screws.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both unicortical and bicortical locking screws provide sufficient stability to facilitate early motion without risk of clinically relevant displacement during plate fixation of midshaft proximal phalangeal fractures.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Unicortical dorsal plate-screw constructs should be considered, where appropriate, to prevent tendon injury or complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unicortical Versus Bicortical Screws for Dorsal Plate Fixation of Phalangeal Fractures.
Purpose: To compare unicortical and bicortical screw fixation for dorsal plating of extra-articular proximal phalangeal fractures.
Methods: Midshaft osteotomies were performed on 21 cadaveric proximal phalanges. The phalanges were fixed via dorsal plating using either unicortical or bicortical locking screws and subjected to a three-point bending test. Cyclical loading was performed, increasing displacement by 0.4 mm every block of five cycles, until construct failure. Clinical failure was defined as 2 mm of displacement. Data collected included maximal force at failure, force at clinical failure, number of cycles to failure, and displacement to failure.
Results: Similar values were noted in maximal force at clinical failure and biomechanical failure, number of cycles to failure, and displacement to failure between phalanges fixed using unicortical or bicortical locking screws.
Conclusions: Both unicortical and bicortical locking screws provide sufficient stability to facilitate early motion without risk of clinically relevant displacement during plate fixation of midshaft proximal phalangeal fractures.
Clinical relevance: Unicortical dorsal plate-screw constructs should be considered, where appropriate, to prevent tendon injury or complications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.