Hannah Riedy, Kiira Lyons, David J Casarett, Megan Jordan, Bryan S Monroe, Erin Eckert, Jessica E Ma
{"title":"儿科患者护理目标文件的内容和全面性。","authors":"Hannah Riedy, Kiira Lyons, David J Casarett, Megan Jordan, Bryan S Monroe, Erin Eckert, Jessica E Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Documented goals-of-care (GOC) conversations promote goal-concordant care; few studies have evaluated the comprehensiveness of this documentation within pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the content of pediatric GOC documentation within a health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GOC notes were written between August 7, 2016 and September 8, 2023 for patients ≤18 years old at one academic health system. Notes were identified by related GOC-specific \"text markers\" in the electronic health record. A pediatric GOC codebook was adapted from existing frameworks. Notes were evaluated for the presence of each of seven components from the codebook. Misfiled GOC notes were excluded from analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 429 notes were written in the inpatient or outpatient setting across pediatric specialties. Most notes were written by the palliative care service (77.9%) and by attending physicians (77.4%). Most patients were <1 (41.0%) or 1-6 years old (23.4%), non-Hispanic (82.9%), and spoke English (90.2%). Of the 91 patients (44.4%) who died before September 8, 2023, the median number of days between their first GOC note and death was 10.3 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-49.0). The median number of GOC components per note was 5.0 out of 7 possible (IQR 4.0-5.5). Frequently documented GOC components were discussion participants (98.1%), goals/fears/priorities (87.6%), and treatment decisions (85.3%). Infrequent components were end-of-life care planning (33.3%) and information preferences (9.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric GOC notes included most GOC components; however, number of components may not reflect the quality and depth of actual discussions. Future research should assess GOC documentation for pediatric patients from diverse backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content and Comprehensiveness of Goals-of-Care Documentation in Pediatric Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Riedy, Kiira Lyons, David J Casarett, Megan Jordan, Bryan S Monroe, Erin Eckert, Jessica E Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Documented goals-of-care (GOC) conversations promote goal-concordant care; few studies have evaluated the comprehensiveness of this documentation within pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the content of pediatric GOC documentation within a health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GOC notes were written between August 7, 2016 and September 8, 2023 for patients ≤18 years old at one academic health system. Notes were identified by related GOC-specific \\\"text markers\\\" in the electronic health record. A pediatric GOC codebook was adapted from existing frameworks. Notes were evaluated for the presence of each of seven components from the codebook. Misfiled GOC notes were excluded from analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 429 notes were written in the inpatient or outpatient setting across pediatric specialties. Most notes were written by the palliative care service (77.9%) and by attending physicians (77.4%). Most patients were <1 (41.0%) or 1-6 years old (23.4%), non-Hispanic (82.9%), and spoke English (90.2%). Of the 91 patients (44.4%) who died before September 8, 2023, the median number of days between their first GOC note and death was 10.3 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-49.0). The median number of GOC components per note was 5.0 out of 7 possible (IQR 4.0-5.5). Frequently documented GOC components were discussion participants (98.1%), goals/fears/priorities (87.6%), and treatment decisions (85.3%). Infrequent components were end-of-life care planning (33.3%) and information preferences (9.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric GOC notes included most GOC components; however, number of components may not reflect the quality and depth of actual discussions. Future research should assess GOC documentation for pediatric patients from diverse backgrounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Content and Comprehensiveness of Goals-of-Care Documentation in Pediatric Patients.
Context: Documented goals-of-care (GOC) conversations promote goal-concordant care; few studies have evaluated the comprehensiveness of this documentation within pediatrics.
Objective: To evaluate the content of pediatric GOC documentation within a health system.
Methods: GOC notes were written between August 7, 2016 and September 8, 2023 for patients ≤18 years old at one academic health system. Notes were identified by related GOC-specific "text markers" in the electronic health record. A pediatric GOC codebook was adapted from existing frameworks. Notes were evaluated for the presence of each of seven components from the codebook. Misfiled GOC notes were excluded from analysis.
Results: A total of 429 notes were written in the inpatient or outpatient setting across pediatric specialties. Most notes were written by the palliative care service (77.9%) and by attending physicians (77.4%). Most patients were <1 (41.0%) or 1-6 years old (23.4%), non-Hispanic (82.9%), and spoke English (90.2%). Of the 91 patients (44.4%) who died before September 8, 2023, the median number of days between their first GOC note and death was 10.3 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-49.0). The median number of GOC components per note was 5.0 out of 7 possible (IQR 4.0-5.5). Frequently documented GOC components were discussion participants (98.1%), goals/fears/priorities (87.6%), and treatment decisions (85.3%). Infrequent components were end-of-life care planning (33.3%) and information preferences (9.8%).
Conclusion: Pediatric GOC notes included most GOC components; however, number of components may not reflect the quality and depth of actual discussions. Future research should assess GOC documentation for pediatric patients from diverse backgrounds.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.