儿科患者护理目标文件的内容和全面性。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hannah Riedy, Kiira Lyons, David J Casarett, Megan Jordan, Bryan S Monroe, Erin Eckert, Jessica E Ma
{"title":"儿科患者护理目标文件的内容和全面性。","authors":"Hannah Riedy, Kiira Lyons, David J Casarett, Megan Jordan, Bryan S Monroe, Erin Eckert, Jessica E Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Documented goals-of-care (GOC) conversations promote goal-concordant care; few studies have evaluated the comprehensiveness of this documentation within pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the content of pediatric GOC documentation within a health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GOC notes were written between August 7, 2016 and September 8, 2023 for patients ≤18 years old at one academic health system. Notes were identified by related GOC-specific \"text markers\" in the electronic health record. A pediatric GOC codebook was adapted from existing frameworks. Notes were evaluated for the presence of each of seven components from the codebook. Misfiled GOC notes were excluded from analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 429 notes were written in the inpatient or outpatient setting across pediatric specialties. Most notes were written by the palliative care service (77.9%) and by attending physicians (77.4%). Most patients were <1 (41.0%) or 1-6 years old (23.4%), non-Hispanic (82.9%), and spoke English (90.2%). Of the 91 patients (44.4%) who died before September 8, 2023, the median number of days between their first GOC note and death was 10.3 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-49.0). The median number of GOC components per note was 5.0 out of 7 possible (IQR 4.0-5.5). Frequently documented GOC components were discussion participants (98.1%), goals/fears/priorities (87.6%), and treatment decisions (85.3%). Infrequent components were end-of-life care planning (33.3%) and information preferences (9.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric GOC notes included most GOC components; however, number of components may not reflect the quality and depth of actual discussions. Future research should assess GOC documentation for pediatric patients from diverse backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content and Comprehensiveness of Goals-of-Care Documentation in Pediatric Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Riedy, Kiira Lyons, David J Casarett, Megan Jordan, Bryan S Monroe, Erin Eckert, Jessica E Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Documented goals-of-care (GOC) conversations promote goal-concordant care; few studies have evaluated the comprehensiveness of this documentation within pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the content of pediatric GOC documentation within a health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GOC notes were written between August 7, 2016 and September 8, 2023 for patients ≤18 years old at one academic health system. Notes were identified by related GOC-specific \\\"text markers\\\" in the electronic health record. A pediatric GOC codebook was adapted from existing frameworks. Notes were evaluated for the presence of each of seven components from the codebook. Misfiled GOC notes were excluded from analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 429 notes were written in the inpatient or outpatient setting across pediatric specialties. Most notes were written by the palliative care service (77.9%) and by attending physicians (77.4%). Most patients were <1 (41.0%) or 1-6 years old (23.4%), non-Hispanic (82.9%), and spoke English (90.2%). Of the 91 patients (44.4%) who died before September 8, 2023, the median number of days between their first GOC note and death was 10.3 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-49.0). The median number of GOC components per note was 5.0 out of 7 possible (IQR 4.0-5.5). Frequently documented GOC components were discussion participants (98.1%), goals/fears/priorities (87.6%), and treatment decisions (85.3%). Infrequent components were end-of-life care planning (33.3%) and information preferences (9.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric GOC notes included most GOC components; however, number of components may not reflect the quality and depth of actual discussions. Future research should assess GOC documentation for pediatric patients from diverse backgrounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:记录的护理目标(GOC)对话促进目标和谐护理;很少有研究评估儿科文献的全面性。目的:评价卫生系统内儿科GOC文件的内容。方法:于2016年7月8日至2023年9月8日在某学术卫生系统对年龄≤18岁的患者进行GOC记录。笔记通过电子健康记录中相关的goc特定“文本标记”进行识别。根据现有框架改编了儿科GOC代码本。评估笔记是否存在密码本中的七个组成部分。错误归档的GOC票据被排除在分析之外。结果:共有429份记录被写在住院或门诊设置横跨儿科专科。大多数病历由姑息治疗服务机构(77.9%)和主治医生(77.4%)撰写。结论:小儿GOC记录包含大部分GOC成分;但是,组成部分的数量可能不能反映实际讨论的质量和深度。未来的研究应评估不同背景的儿科患者的GOC记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Content and Comprehensiveness of Goals-of-Care Documentation in Pediatric Patients.

Context: Documented goals-of-care (GOC) conversations promote goal-concordant care; few studies have evaluated the comprehensiveness of this documentation within pediatrics.

Objective: To evaluate the content of pediatric GOC documentation within a health system.

Methods: GOC notes were written between August 7, 2016 and September 8, 2023 for patients ≤18 years old at one academic health system. Notes were identified by related GOC-specific "text markers" in the electronic health record. A pediatric GOC codebook was adapted from existing frameworks. Notes were evaluated for the presence of each of seven components from the codebook. Misfiled GOC notes were excluded from analysis.

Results: A total of 429 notes were written in the inpatient or outpatient setting across pediatric specialties. Most notes were written by the palliative care service (77.9%) and by attending physicians (77.4%). Most patients were <1 (41.0%) or 1-6 years old (23.4%), non-Hispanic (82.9%), and spoke English (90.2%). Of the 91 patients (44.4%) who died before September 8, 2023, the median number of days between their first GOC note and death was 10.3 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-49.0). The median number of GOC components per note was 5.0 out of 7 possible (IQR 4.0-5.5). Frequently documented GOC components were discussion participants (98.1%), goals/fears/priorities (87.6%), and treatment decisions (85.3%). Infrequent components were end-of-life care planning (33.3%) and information preferences (9.8%).

Conclusion: Pediatric GOC notes included most GOC components; however, number of components may not reflect the quality and depth of actual discussions. Future research should assess GOC documentation for pediatric patients from diverse backgrounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信