职业女性步行计划:一项连续多任务随机试验。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Susan W Buchholz, Manju Daniel, Spyros Kitsiou, Michael E Schoeny, Shannon Halloway, Tricia J Johnson, Sachin Vispute, JoEllen Wilbur
{"title":"职业女性步行计划:一项连续多任务随机试验。","authors":"Susan W Buchholz, Manju Daniel, Spyros Kitsiou, Michael E Schoeny, Shannon Halloway, Tricia J Johnson, Sachin Vispute, JoEllen Wilbur","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2024-0790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different interventions have shown efficacy in improving physical activity in women. This study aimed to determine the most effective adaptive intervention combining 4 efficacious treatments (Fitbit, text messages, personal calls, and group meetings) for improving physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Working Women Walking program used a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design with 3 phases: initial (weeks 1-8), augmented (weeks 9-34), and maintenance (weeks 35-50). Low-active women aged 18-70 working at an academic medical center were recruited. In the initial phase, participants were randomized to Fitbit or Fitbit + text messages. After 8 weeks, nonresponders were rerandomized to an augmented treatment (personal calls or group meetings). The primary outcomes (steps/day and minutes of moderate/vigorous physical activity [MVPA]/day via ActiGraph) were assessed at baseline and 8, 34, and 50 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study had 301 women (age: 45.1 [11.6] y). During the initial phase, there were no differences by initial treatment for change in steps (P = .78) or MVPA (P = .60). During the augmented phase, there were no differences by augmented treatment among nonresponders for change in steps (P = .95) or MVPA (P = .78). A significant overall increase was seen in steps (752/d; P < .001, d = 0.56) and MVPA at 8 weeks (4.1 min/d; P < .001, d = 0.48), and this was sustained at 34 and 50 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Text messages, personal calls, and group meetings did not lead to increased physical activity. Using Fitbit and goal setting (a constant) appeared to have some benefit for many of the women in improving physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working Women Walking Program: A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Susan W Buchholz, Manju Daniel, Spyros Kitsiou, Michael E Schoeny, Shannon Halloway, Tricia J Johnson, Sachin Vispute, JoEllen Wilbur\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jpah.2024-0790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different interventions have shown efficacy in improving physical activity in women. This study aimed to determine the most effective adaptive intervention combining 4 efficacious treatments (Fitbit, text messages, personal calls, and group meetings) for improving physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Working Women Walking program used a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design with 3 phases: initial (weeks 1-8), augmented (weeks 9-34), and maintenance (weeks 35-50). Low-active women aged 18-70 working at an academic medical center were recruited. In the initial phase, participants were randomized to Fitbit or Fitbit + text messages. After 8 weeks, nonresponders were rerandomized to an augmented treatment (personal calls or group meetings). The primary outcomes (steps/day and minutes of moderate/vigorous physical activity [MVPA]/day via ActiGraph) were assessed at baseline and 8, 34, and 50 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study had 301 women (age: 45.1 [11.6] y). During the initial phase, there were no differences by initial treatment for change in steps (P = .78) or MVPA (P = .60). During the augmented phase, there were no differences by augmented treatment among nonresponders for change in steps (P = .95) or MVPA (P = .78). A significant overall increase was seen in steps (752/d; P < .001, d = 0.56) and MVPA at 8 weeks (4.1 min/d; P < .001, d = 0.48), and this was sustained at 34 and 50 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Text messages, personal calls, and group meetings did not lead to increased physical activity. Using Fitbit and goal setting (a constant) appeared to have some benefit for many of the women in improving physical activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0790\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0790","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同的干预措施已显示出改善妇女身体活动的有效性。本研究旨在确定最有效的适应性干预,结合4种有效的治疗方法(Fitbit、短信、私人电话和小组会议)来改善身体活动。方法:职业女性步行项目采用顺序多任务随机试验(SMART)设计,分为3个阶段:初始阶段(1-8周)、增强阶段(9-34周)和维持阶段(35-50周)。招募了在学术医疗中心工作的18-70岁的低运动女性。在初始阶段,参与者被随机分配到Fitbit或Fitbit +短信。8周后,无应答者被重新随机分配到增强治疗(个人电话或小组会议)。主要结果(通过ActiGraph进行的中等/剧烈身体活动的步数/天和分钟数[MVPA]/天)在基线和8、34和50周时进行评估。结果:本研究共纳入301名女性,年龄45.1[11.6]岁。在初始阶段,初始治疗在步长变化(P = 0.78)或MVPA (P = 0.60)方面没有差异。在强化期,无反应者之间的强化治疗在步数变化(P = 0.95)或MVPA (P = 0.78)方面没有差异。总体上出现了显著的增长(752/d;P < 0.001, d = 0.56)和8周时MVPA (4.1 min/d;P < 0.001, d = 0.48),这种情况持续到34周和50周。结论:短信、私人电话和小组会议不会增加身体活动。使用Fitbit和设定目标(一个常量)似乎对许多女性在改善身体活动方面有一些好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working Women Walking Program: A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial.

Background: Different interventions have shown efficacy in improving physical activity in women. This study aimed to determine the most effective adaptive intervention combining 4 efficacious treatments (Fitbit, text messages, personal calls, and group meetings) for improving physical activity.

Methods: The Working Women Walking program used a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design with 3 phases: initial (weeks 1-8), augmented (weeks 9-34), and maintenance (weeks 35-50). Low-active women aged 18-70 working at an academic medical center were recruited. In the initial phase, participants were randomized to Fitbit or Fitbit + text messages. After 8 weeks, nonresponders were rerandomized to an augmented treatment (personal calls or group meetings). The primary outcomes (steps/day and minutes of moderate/vigorous physical activity [MVPA]/day via ActiGraph) were assessed at baseline and 8, 34, and 50 weeks.

Results: The study had 301 women (age: 45.1 [11.6] y). During the initial phase, there were no differences by initial treatment for change in steps (P = .78) or MVPA (P = .60). During the augmented phase, there were no differences by augmented treatment among nonresponders for change in steps (P = .95) or MVPA (P = .78). A significant overall increase was seen in steps (752/d; P < .001, d = 0.56) and MVPA at 8 weeks (4.1 min/d; P < .001, d = 0.48), and this was sustained at 34 and 50 weeks.

Conclusions: Text messages, personal calls, and group meetings did not lead to increased physical activity. Using Fitbit and goal setting (a constant) appeared to have some benefit for many of the women in improving physical activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信