自付药费和潜在的滥用公共资源-分析在意大利的情况。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Leonarda Maurmo, Federico Ruta, Grazia Dicuonzo, Vincenzo Signoretta, Cosimo Gennari, Vincenzo Dicuonzo, Donato Suma, Mariarosaria D'Ambrosio, Cataldo Procacci
{"title":"自付药费和潜在的滥用公共资源-分析在意大利的情况。","authors":"Leonarda Maurmo, Federico Ruta, Grazia Dicuonzo, Vincenzo Signoretta, Cosimo Gennari, Vincenzo Dicuonzo, Donato Suma, Mariarosaria D'Ambrosio, Cataldo Procacci","doi":"10.1186/s12962-025-00619-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increase in longevity determines a greater need to receive medical care and pharmacological treatments. The introduction of patient cost-sharing in pharmaceutical expenditures aims to finance the National/Regional Health System while simultaneously reducing excessive consumption of health services. However, in the context of national health insurance, decreasing drug expenditures can lead to increased hospitalization costs. This phenomenon highlights the complexity of healthcare financing, where measures intended to control spending in one area may inadvertently escalate costs in another, necessitating a careful evaluation of health policies and their broader implications on patient care and system sustainability. The main focus of the analysis is to examine drug expenditures and the private purchase of drugs. Specifically, the analysis investigates the spending on drug therapies across different regional macro-areas (the Italian regional macro-areas are geographical subdivisions used to organize activities and services, particularly in the context of healthcare and scientific research.). Moreover, it analized the variability in the use of AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) notes, a regulatory tool used in Italy to define the reimbursement criteria and therapeutic indications for which a drug can be prescribed at the expense of the National Health Service (SSN), and the extent to which individuals resort to private purchasing for drugs that are in total Health Service reimbursement. Additionally, the analysis delves into the top 30 active substances that significantly impact pharmaceutical spending, as reported in the Osmed 2022 report. This research found heterogeneous use of AIFA notes for many drugs across Italy. Inappropriate use of restrictive notes at prescription indicates high patient out-of-pocket spending, constituting financial damage. Comparing regional ratios to national benchmarks reveals deviations in prescribing behavior and AIFA note use by GPs. Regions with highest inappropriate AIFA note use also have highest out-of-pocket spending and lowest incomes, suggesting cultural factors drive branded over generic drug choices when public reimbursement is available.There can be many causes, including a cultural nature, which push patients to purchase the originator drug by paying the excess amount.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"23 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out-of-pocket pharmaceutical expenditure and potential misuse of public resources - analysis in the Italian context.\",\"authors\":\"Leonarda Maurmo, Federico Ruta, Grazia Dicuonzo, Vincenzo Signoretta, Cosimo Gennari, Vincenzo Dicuonzo, Donato Suma, Mariarosaria D'Ambrosio, Cataldo Procacci\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12962-025-00619-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The increase in longevity determines a greater need to receive medical care and pharmacological treatments. The introduction of patient cost-sharing in pharmaceutical expenditures aims to finance the National/Regional Health System while simultaneously reducing excessive consumption of health services. However, in the context of national health insurance, decreasing drug expenditures can lead to increased hospitalization costs. This phenomenon highlights the complexity of healthcare financing, where measures intended to control spending in one area may inadvertently escalate costs in another, necessitating a careful evaluation of health policies and their broader implications on patient care and system sustainability. The main focus of the analysis is to examine drug expenditures and the private purchase of drugs. Specifically, the analysis investigates the spending on drug therapies across different regional macro-areas (the Italian regional macro-areas are geographical subdivisions used to organize activities and services, particularly in the context of healthcare and scientific research.). Moreover, it analized the variability in the use of AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) notes, a regulatory tool used in Italy to define the reimbursement criteria and therapeutic indications for which a drug can be prescribed at the expense of the National Health Service (SSN), and the extent to which individuals resort to private purchasing for drugs that are in total Health Service reimbursement. Additionally, the analysis delves into the top 30 active substances that significantly impact pharmaceutical spending, as reported in the Osmed 2022 report. This research found heterogeneous use of AIFA notes for many drugs across Italy. Inappropriate use of restrictive notes at prescription indicates high patient out-of-pocket spending, constituting financial damage. Comparing regional ratios to national benchmarks reveals deviations in prescribing behavior and AIFA note use by GPs. Regions with highest inappropriate AIFA note use also have highest out-of-pocket spending and lowest incomes, suggesting cultural factors drive branded over generic drug choices when public reimbursement is available.There can be many causes, including a cultural nature, which push patients to purchase the originator drug by paying the excess amount.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007333/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00619-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00619-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寿命的延长决定了更需要接受医疗和药物治疗。在药品支出中实行病人费用分担制度的目的是为国家/区域卫生系统提供资金,同时减少对卫生服务的过度消费。然而,在国家健康保险的情况下,药品支出的减少可能导致住院费用的增加。这一现象凸显了医疗融资的复杂性,旨在控制一个领域支出的措施可能会在不经意间增加另一个领域的成本,因此有必要仔细评估卫生政策及其对患者护理和系统可持续性的更广泛影响。分析的主要重点是审查药品支出和私人购买药品。具体而言,该分析调查了不同区域宏观区域的药物治疗支出(意大利区域宏观区域是用于组织活动和服务的地理分区,特别是在医疗保健和科学研究方面)。此外,它还分析了意大利药品管理局(AIFA)说明(意大利使用的一种监管工具,用于确定报销标准和可由国家卫生服务(SSN)支付费用开出的药物的治疗适应症)使用情况的差异,以及个人在医疗服务总报销范围内自行购买药品的程度。此外,该分析还深入研究了Osmed 2022报告中报告的对药品支出产生重大影响的前30种活性物质。这项研究发现,意大利各地对许多药物使用AIFA注释的情况各不相同。在处方中不恰当地使用限制性票据表明患者自付费用高,构成经济损失。将区域比率与国家基准进行比较,揭示了全科医生在处方行为和AIFA笔记使用方面的偏差。不适当使用AIFA药品最多的地区也有最高的自付支出和最低的收入,这表明,在公共可报销的情况下,文化因素推动了品牌药而非仿制药的选择。可能有许多原因,包括文化性质,促使患者支付多余的价格购买原始药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Out-of-pocket pharmaceutical expenditure and potential misuse of public resources - analysis in the Italian context.

The increase in longevity determines a greater need to receive medical care and pharmacological treatments. The introduction of patient cost-sharing in pharmaceutical expenditures aims to finance the National/Regional Health System while simultaneously reducing excessive consumption of health services. However, in the context of national health insurance, decreasing drug expenditures can lead to increased hospitalization costs. This phenomenon highlights the complexity of healthcare financing, where measures intended to control spending in one area may inadvertently escalate costs in another, necessitating a careful evaluation of health policies and their broader implications on patient care and system sustainability. The main focus of the analysis is to examine drug expenditures and the private purchase of drugs. Specifically, the analysis investigates the spending on drug therapies across different regional macro-areas (the Italian regional macro-areas are geographical subdivisions used to organize activities and services, particularly in the context of healthcare and scientific research.). Moreover, it analized the variability in the use of AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) notes, a regulatory tool used in Italy to define the reimbursement criteria and therapeutic indications for which a drug can be prescribed at the expense of the National Health Service (SSN), and the extent to which individuals resort to private purchasing for drugs that are in total Health Service reimbursement. Additionally, the analysis delves into the top 30 active substances that significantly impact pharmaceutical spending, as reported in the Osmed 2022 report. This research found heterogeneous use of AIFA notes for many drugs across Italy. Inappropriate use of restrictive notes at prescription indicates high patient out-of-pocket spending, constituting financial damage. Comparing regional ratios to national benchmarks reveals deviations in prescribing behavior and AIFA note use by GPs. Regions with highest inappropriate AIFA note use also have highest out-of-pocket spending and lowest incomes, suggesting cultural factors drive branded over generic drug choices when public reimbursement is available.There can be many causes, including a cultural nature, which push patients to purchase the originator drug by paying the excess amount.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信