感知偏见和美国围产期保健质量:对实践和政策的影响。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rosemary E Timmons, Amparo C Villablanca, Collin L Ellis
{"title":"感知偏见和美国围产期保健质量:对实践和政策的影响。","authors":"Rosemary E Timmons, Amparo C Villablanca, Collin L Ellis","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> U.S. maternal mortality rates are high. Inequities in birth outcomes are pervasive. Patient perception of bias during pregnancy-related care, especially among minoritized communities, is a risk factor for adverse perinatal health outcomes. Addressing this may be vital to lowering maternal mortality and improving care. The aim of this review was to explore the association between patient perception of provider bias and U.S. perinatal health care quality in birthing people. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of original published studies (2003-2023) addressing perceived bias/discrimination and perinatal care quality metrics. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were evaluated to formulate a broad conceptualization of the research examining perceived bias and perinatal health care quality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Four addressed themes arose from this review that related to the association of perceived bias with: (i) demographic factors such as race/ethnicity and insurance type; (ii) patients' pregnancy-related health care engagement; (iii) a breakdown in communication and trust between patients and providers; and (iv) patients' sense of choice/control in their perinatal health care engagement. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Researchers are using first-person accounts of perceived bias to better understand the etiology of inequitable maternal health statistics in the United States. Preliminary outcomes from this body of work indicate a relationship between the perception of bias, provider relationships, health care engagement, and maternal agency. The role of bias perception on maternal mortality may be an important barrier to improved health outcomes, particularly in minoritized populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Bias and U.S. Perinatal Health Care Quality: Implications for Practice and Policy.\",\"authors\":\"Rosemary E Timmons, Amparo C Villablanca, Collin L Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2024.0930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> U.S. maternal mortality rates are high. Inequities in birth outcomes are pervasive. Patient perception of bias during pregnancy-related care, especially among minoritized communities, is a risk factor for adverse perinatal health outcomes. Addressing this may be vital to lowering maternal mortality and improving care. The aim of this review was to explore the association between patient perception of provider bias and U.S. perinatal health care quality in birthing people. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of original published studies (2003-2023) addressing perceived bias/discrimination and perinatal care quality metrics. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were evaluated to formulate a broad conceptualization of the research examining perceived bias and perinatal health care quality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Four addressed themes arose from this review that related to the association of perceived bias with: (i) demographic factors such as race/ethnicity and insurance type; (ii) patients' pregnancy-related health care engagement; (iii) a breakdown in communication and trust between patients and providers; and (iv) patients' sense of choice/control in their perinatal health care engagement. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Researchers are using first-person accounts of perceived bias to better understand the etiology of inequitable maternal health statistics in the United States. Preliminary outcomes from this body of work indicate a relationship between the perception of bias, provider relationships, health care engagement, and maternal agency. The role of bias perception on maternal mortality may be an important barrier to improved health outcomes, particularly in minoritized populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0930\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0930","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:美国产妇死亡率很高。出生结果的不平等现象普遍存在。患者对妊娠相关护理的偏见感知,特别是在少数族裔社区,是不良围产期健康结果的一个风险因素。解决这一问题可能对降低孕产妇死亡率和改善护理至关重要。本综述的目的是探讨患者对提供者偏见的感知与美国分娩人群围产期卫生保健质量之间的关系。方法:根据PRISMA-ScR指南,我们对原始发表的研究(2003-2023)进行了范围审查,以解决感知到的偏见/歧视和围产期护理质量指标。定性和定量研究都进行了评估,以形成一个广泛的概念,研究检查感知偏见和围产期保健质量。结果:本综述提出了四个主题,涉及与感知偏见的关联:(i)人口因素,如种族/民族和保险类型;(二)患者与妊娠有关的医疗保健参与情况;(iii)病人与医护人员之间的沟通和信任中断;(4)患者围产期保健参与的选择/控制感。结论:研究人员正在使用感知偏见的第一人称帐户,以更好地了解美国不公平的孕产妇保健统计的病因。这项工作的初步结果表明,偏见感知、提供者关系、医疗保健参与和孕产妇代理之间存在关系。偏见认知对孕产妇死亡率的作用可能是改善健康结果的一个重要障碍,特别是在少数群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived Bias and U.S. Perinatal Health Care Quality: Implications for Practice and Policy.

Introduction: U.S. maternal mortality rates are high. Inequities in birth outcomes are pervasive. Patient perception of bias during pregnancy-related care, especially among minoritized communities, is a risk factor for adverse perinatal health outcomes. Addressing this may be vital to lowering maternal mortality and improving care. The aim of this review was to explore the association between patient perception of provider bias and U.S. perinatal health care quality in birthing people. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of original published studies (2003-2023) addressing perceived bias/discrimination and perinatal care quality metrics. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were evaluated to formulate a broad conceptualization of the research examining perceived bias and perinatal health care quality. Results: Four addressed themes arose from this review that related to the association of perceived bias with: (i) demographic factors such as race/ethnicity and insurance type; (ii) patients' pregnancy-related health care engagement; (iii) a breakdown in communication and trust between patients and providers; and (iv) patients' sense of choice/control in their perinatal health care engagement. Conclusions: Researchers are using first-person accounts of perceived bias to better understand the etiology of inequitable maternal health statistics in the United States. Preliminary outcomes from this body of work indicate a relationship between the perception of bias, provider relationships, health care engagement, and maternal agency. The role of bias perception on maternal mortality may be an important barrier to improved health outcomes, particularly in minoritized populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信