颅脑损伤指南1和颅脑损伤指南2中早期静脉血栓栓塞预防:一项5年分析。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sigfredo Villarin Ayala, Omar Hejazi, Mohammad Al Ma'ani, Adam Nelson, Muhammad Haris Khurshid, Collin Stewart, Francisco Castillo Diaz, Audrey L Spencer, Louis J Magnotti, Bellal Joseph
{"title":"颅脑损伤指南1和颅脑损伤指南2中早期静脉血栓栓塞预防:一项5年分析。","authors":"Sigfredo Villarin Ayala, Omar Hejazi, Mohammad Al Ma'ani, Adam Nelson, Muhammad Haris Khurshid, Collin Stewart, Francisco Castillo Diaz, Audrey L Spencer, Louis J Magnotti, Bellal Joseph","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) was developed to reduce hospitalization of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Limited data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for patients were categorized as BIG 1 and BIG 2 hospitalized for non-TBI-related trauma. The aim of this study is to assess safety of early VTE prophylaxis among BIG 1 and BIG 2 patients. We hypothesize that early VTE prophylaxis is safe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed retrospective analysis of 2017-2021 TBI database at our level 1 trauma center and included all adult trauma patients with TBI categorized as BIG 1 or BIG 2 who received thromboprophylaxis. Patients were stratified into EARLY (≤24 hours) and LATE (>24 hours) initiation of VTE prophylaxis. Outcomes were rates of repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) scan for neurological deterioration, mortality, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent effect of timing of VTE prophylaxis on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 634 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 42, 62% were males, the mean systolic blood pressure was 129 mm Hg, and the median ISS was 13. There were 393 patients in EARLY group. Only 20 patients underwent RHCT with no difference between the groups (p = 0.398), with no worsening from index head CT. EARLY group had lower incidence of DVT (EARLY: 1% vs. LATE: 5%, p = 0.020) but no difference in pulmonary embolism (p = 0.620) or mortality (p = 0.265). On multivariable regression analysis, early VTE prophylaxis was associated with reducing risk of DVT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.341; 95% confidence interval, 0.121-0.783; p = 0.043). However, it was not associated with RHCT (p = 0.219) or mortality (p = 0.653).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early thromboprophylaxis for BIG 1 or BIG 2 trauma patients is safe and associated with reducing DVT risk without increasing risk of ICH progression or mortality. Future studies are needed to validate thromboprophylaxis risk-benefit ratio among BIG 1 and BIG 2 patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Brain Injury Guidelines 1 and Brain Injury Guidelines 2 Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A 5-Year Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sigfredo Villarin Ayala, Omar Hejazi, Mohammad Al Ma'ani, Adam Nelson, Muhammad Haris Khurshid, Collin Stewart, Francisco Castillo Diaz, Audrey L Spencer, Louis J Magnotti, Bellal Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000004647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) was developed to reduce hospitalization of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Limited data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for patients were categorized as BIG 1 and BIG 2 hospitalized for non-TBI-related trauma. The aim of this study is to assess safety of early VTE prophylaxis among BIG 1 and BIG 2 patients. We hypothesize that early VTE prophylaxis is safe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed retrospective analysis of 2017-2021 TBI database at our level 1 trauma center and included all adult trauma patients with TBI categorized as BIG 1 or BIG 2 who received thromboprophylaxis. Patients were stratified into EARLY (≤24 hours) and LATE (>24 hours) initiation of VTE prophylaxis. Outcomes were rates of repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) scan for neurological deterioration, mortality, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent effect of timing of VTE prophylaxis on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 634 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 42, 62% were males, the mean systolic blood pressure was 129 mm Hg, and the median ISS was 13. There were 393 patients in EARLY group. Only 20 patients underwent RHCT with no difference between the groups (p = 0.398), with no worsening from index head CT. EARLY group had lower incidence of DVT (EARLY: 1% vs. LATE: 5%, p = 0.020) but no difference in pulmonary embolism (p = 0.620) or mortality (p = 0.265). On multivariable regression analysis, early VTE prophylaxis was associated with reducing risk of DVT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.341; 95% confidence interval, 0.121-0.783; p = 0.043). However, it was not associated with RHCT (p = 0.219) or mortality (p = 0.653).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early thromboprophylaxis for BIG 1 or BIG 2 trauma patients is safe and associated with reducing DVT risk without increasing risk of ICH progression or mortality. Future studies are needed to validate thromboprophylaxis risk-benefit ratio among BIG 1 and BIG 2 patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004647\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:制定脑损伤指南(BIG)以减少轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的住院率。静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防的有限数据被归类为BIG 1和BIG 2住院的非tbi相关创伤患者。本研究的目的是评估BIG 1和BIG 2患者早期静脉血栓栓塞预防的安全性。我们假设早期静脉血栓栓塞预防是安全的。方法:我们对一级创伤中心2017-2021年TBI数据库进行了回顾性分析,并纳入了所有接受血栓预防治疗的BIG 1或BIG 2 TBI成人创伤患者。患者被分为早期(≤24小时)和晚期(>24小时)开始静脉血栓栓塞预防。结果是神经功能恶化、死亡率、深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞的重复头部计算机断层扫描(RHCT)率。采用多变量logistic回归来确定静脉血栓栓塞预防时间对结果的独立影响。结果:634例符合纳入标准。平均年龄42岁,男性占62%,平均收缩压129 mm Hg, ISS中位13。早期组393例。只有20例患者接受了RHCT检查,两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.398)。早期组DVT发生率较低(EARLY: 1% vs. LATE: 5%, p = 0.020),但肺栓塞(p = 0.620)和死亡率(p = 0.265)无差异。在多变量回归分析中,早期静脉血栓栓塞预防与降低DVT风险相关(校正优势比0.341;95%置信区间为0.121 ~ 0.783;P = 0.043)。然而,与RHCT (p = 0.219)或死亡率(p = 0.653)无关。结论:BIG 1或BIG 2创伤患者的早期血栓预防是安全的,并且与降低DVT风险相关,而不会增加脑出血进展或死亡率的风险。需要进一步的研究来验证BIG 1和BIG 2患者的血栓预防风险-收益比。证据水平:治疗/护理管理;第三层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Brain Injury Guidelines 1 and Brain Injury Guidelines 2 Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A 5-Year Analysis.

Objectives: Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) was developed to reduce hospitalization of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Limited data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for patients were categorized as BIG 1 and BIG 2 hospitalized for non-TBI-related trauma. The aim of this study is to assess safety of early VTE prophylaxis among BIG 1 and BIG 2 patients. We hypothesize that early VTE prophylaxis is safe.

Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of 2017-2021 TBI database at our level 1 trauma center and included all adult trauma patients with TBI categorized as BIG 1 or BIG 2 who received thromboprophylaxis. Patients were stratified into EARLY (≤24 hours) and LATE (>24 hours) initiation of VTE prophylaxis. Outcomes were rates of repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) scan for neurological deterioration, mortality, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent effect of timing of VTE prophylaxis on outcomes.

Results: A total of 634 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 42, 62% were males, the mean systolic blood pressure was 129 mm Hg, and the median ISS was 13. There were 393 patients in EARLY group. Only 20 patients underwent RHCT with no difference between the groups (p = 0.398), with no worsening from index head CT. EARLY group had lower incidence of DVT (EARLY: 1% vs. LATE: 5%, p = 0.020) but no difference in pulmonary embolism (p = 0.620) or mortality (p = 0.265). On multivariable regression analysis, early VTE prophylaxis was associated with reducing risk of DVT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.341; 95% confidence interval, 0.121-0.783; p = 0.043). However, it was not associated with RHCT (p = 0.219) or mortality (p = 0.653).

Conclusion: Early thromboprophylaxis for BIG 1 or BIG 2 trauma patients is safe and associated with reducing DVT risk without increasing risk of ICH progression or mortality. Future studies are needed to validate thromboprophylaxis risk-benefit ratio among BIG 1 and BIG 2 patients.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信