Kingsley R Chin, Erik Spayde, William M Costigan, Vito Lore, Hope Estevez, Chukwunonso C Ilogu, Jason A Seale
{"title":"无螺纹三角形钛植入物与全螺纹螺钉的生物力学比较研究:评估两种骶髂关节固定植入物设计的拔出强度。","authors":"Kingsley R Chin, Erik Spayde, William M Costigan, Vito Lore, Hope Estevez, Chukwunonso C Ilogu, Jason A Seale","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering that implant backout is a recognized mode of failure, evaluating the pullout strength is critical for assessing anchoring efficacy. The Sacrix<sup>®</sup> fully threaded screw (TS) was designed specifically for Less Exposure Spine Surgery (LESS) to reduce incision size, surgical time, and blood loss, using two implants for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation. This study compares the Sacrix<sup>®</sup> design with the SI-Bone iFuse non-threaded triangular titanium implant (TTI) design, which is widely regarded as the industry standard, and represents the first comparative biomechanical pullout strength study of these implant designs currently used in SIJ fusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted mechanical static axial pullout tests on three 7.0 mm × 45 mm iFuse non-threaded TTIs and six 8.0 mm × 40 mm Sacrix<sup>®</sup> fully TS embedded in polyurethane foam blocks. An INSTRON 8874 Bi-Axial Tabletop Servohydraulic Dynamic Testing System was used to perform the tests by applying a 2.5 kN axial load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective surface areas of the iFuse non-threaded TTI and Sacrix<sup>®</sup> fully threaded TS were comparable, measuring 294.15 and 289.81 mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The TS exhibited a significantly higher mean static axial pullout strength of 814.90 N [standard deviation (SD), ±99.428 N] compared to the TTI 200.14 N (SD, ±14.428 N). Statistical analyses, including Welch's <i>t</i>-test and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, revealed significant differences in pullout strength between the two implants (P<0.05). Variance analysis confirmed the differences in pullout strength variances between the implants (P=0.040), suggesting that the variability in pullout strength was distinct for each implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Sacrix<sup>®</sup> fully threaded TS demonstrated a threefold increase in pullout strength compared with the SI-Bone iFuse non-threaded TTI, suggesting that future SIJ fusion designs should favor threaded over non-threaded implants for improved anchoring capability.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":"88-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative biomechanical study of a non-threaded triangular titanium implant versus a fully threaded screw: assessing pullout strength of two sacroiliac joint fixation implant designs.\",\"authors\":\"Kingsley R Chin, Erik Spayde, William M Costigan, Vito Lore, Hope Estevez, Chukwunonso C Ilogu, Jason A Seale\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-24-99\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering that implant backout is a recognized mode of failure, evaluating the pullout strength is critical for assessing anchoring efficacy. The Sacrix<sup>®</sup> fully threaded screw (TS) was designed specifically for Less Exposure Spine Surgery (LESS) to reduce incision size, surgical time, and blood loss, using two implants for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation. This study compares the Sacrix<sup>®</sup> design with the SI-Bone iFuse non-threaded triangular titanium implant (TTI) design, which is widely regarded as the industry standard, and represents the first comparative biomechanical pullout strength study of these implant designs currently used in SIJ fusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted mechanical static axial pullout tests on three 7.0 mm × 45 mm iFuse non-threaded TTIs and six 8.0 mm × 40 mm Sacrix<sup>®</sup> fully TS embedded in polyurethane foam blocks. An INSTRON 8874 Bi-Axial Tabletop Servohydraulic Dynamic Testing System was used to perform the tests by applying a 2.5 kN axial load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective surface areas of the iFuse non-threaded TTI and Sacrix<sup>®</sup> fully threaded TS were comparable, measuring 294.15 and 289.81 mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The TS exhibited a significantly higher mean static axial pullout strength of 814.90 N [standard deviation (SD), ±99.428 N] compared to the TTI 200.14 N (SD, ±14.428 N). Statistical analyses, including Welch's <i>t</i>-test and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, revealed significant differences in pullout strength between the two implants (P<0.05). Variance analysis confirmed the differences in pullout strength variances between the implants (P=0.040), suggesting that the variability in pullout strength was distinct for each implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Sacrix<sup>®</sup> fully threaded TS demonstrated a threefold increase in pullout strength compared with the SI-Bone iFuse non-threaded TTI, suggesting that future SIJ fusion designs should favor threaded over non-threaded implants for improved anchoring capability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"88-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-99\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:考虑到种植体后退是一种公认的失败模式,评估拔出强度对于评估锚定效果至关重要。Sacrix®全螺纹螺钉(TS)是专门为少暴露脊柱手术(Less Exposure Spine Surgery, Less)设计的,使用两个植入物固定骶髂关节(SIJ),可减少切口大小、手术时间和出血量。本研究比较了Sacrix®设计与SI-Bone iFuse非螺纹三角形钛种植体(TTI)设计,后者被广泛认为是行业标准,并代表了目前用于SIJ融合的这些种植体设计的首次生物力学拉拔强度比较研究。方法:我们对3个7.0 mm × 45 mm iFuse无螺纹TS和6个8.0 mm × 40 mm Sacrix®全TS进行了机械静态轴向拉伸试验。采用INSTRON 8874双轴台式伺服液压动态试验系统,施加2.5 kN轴向载荷进行试验。结果:iFuse无螺纹TTI和Sacrix全螺纹TS的有效表面积相当,分别为294.15和289.81 mm2。与TTI组相比,TS组的平均静态轴向拉拔强度为814.90 N[标准差(SD),±99.428 N],显著高于TTI组的200.14 N (SD,±14.428 N)。统计分析,包括Welch's t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,揭示了两种种植体之间的拔牙强度有显著差异(pp结论:Sacrix®全螺纹TS与SI-Bone iFuse无螺纹TTI相比,拔牙强度增加了三倍,这表明未来的SIJ融合设计应该更倾向于螺纹种植体而不是非螺纹种植体,以提高锚定能力。
A comparative biomechanical study of a non-threaded triangular titanium implant versus a fully threaded screw: assessing pullout strength of two sacroiliac joint fixation implant designs.
Background: Considering that implant backout is a recognized mode of failure, evaluating the pullout strength is critical for assessing anchoring efficacy. The Sacrix® fully threaded screw (TS) was designed specifically for Less Exposure Spine Surgery (LESS) to reduce incision size, surgical time, and blood loss, using two implants for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation. This study compares the Sacrix® design with the SI-Bone iFuse non-threaded triangular titanium implant (TTI) design, which is widely regarded as the industry standard, and represents the first comparative biomechanical pullout strength study of these implant designs currently used in SIJ fusions.
Methods: We conducted mechanical static axial pullout tests on three 7.0 mm × 45 mm iFuse non-threaded TTIs and six 8.0 mm × 40 mm Sacrix® fully TS embedded in polyurethane foam blocks. An INSTRON 8874 Bi-Axial Tabletop Servohydraulic Dynamic Testing System was used to perform the tests by applying a 2.5 kN axial load.
Results: The effective surface areas of the iFuse non-threaded TTI and Sacrix® fully threaded TS were comparable, measuring 294.15 and 289.81 mm2, respectively. The TS exhibited a significantly higher mean static axial pullout strength of 814.90 N [standard deviation (SD), ±99.428 N] compared to the TTI 200.14 N (SD, ±14.428 N). Statistical analyses, including Welch's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test, revealed significant differences in pullout strength between the two implants (P<0.05). Variance analysis confirmed the differences in pullout strength variances between the implants (P=0.040), suggesting that the variability in pullout strength was distinct for each implant.
Conclusions: The Sacrix® fully threaded TS demonstrated a threefold increase in pullout strength compared with the SI-Bone iFuse non-threaded TTI, suggesting that future SIJ fusion designs should favor threaded over non-threaded implants for improved anchoring capability.