提高晚年生活的幸福感:行动能力限制、心理适应和辅助技术的相互作用。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Tai-Te Su, Shannon T Mejía
{"title":"提高晚年生活的幸福感:行动能力限制、心理适应和辅助技术的相互作用。","authors":"Tai-Te Su, Shannon T Mejía","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2494659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The experience of mobility limitations can compromise well-being in older adulthood. This study aimed to investigate the psychological mechanisms through which mobility limitations affect well-being and to evaluate how assistive technology might support these underlying processes among older adults.</p><p><p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Using data from the 2015-2017 rounds of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (<i>N</i> = 5,091), we conducted mediation analysis to determine if dispositional tenacity and flexibility in 2016 linked mobility limitations in 2015 to well-being in 2017. Moderation analysis evaluated whether assistive technology use in 2015 supported tenacity and flexibility in the subsequent year.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In 2015, 693 (13.6%) and 685 (13.5%) older adults reported mobility limitations when going outside and getting around inside, respectively. Mobility limitations had negative direct and indirect associations with well-being through pathways of reduced dispositional tenacity and flexibility. In the context of going outside, assistive technology use mitigated the impact of mobility limitation and supported the dual processes of tenacity and flexibility. However, for getting around inside, assistive technology use was associated with reduced dispositional tenacity and flexibility and further exacerbated the negative impact of mobility limitation.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the psychological mechanisms that connect mobility limitations to well-being. Findings suggest that deploying tailored assistive technology may protect older adults' well-being by supporting their psychological adaptation to age-related challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2221-2233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing well-being in later life: the interplay of mobility limitation, psychological adaptation, and assistive technology.\",\"authors\":\"Tai-Te Su, Shannon T Mejía\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2025.2494659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The experience of mobility limitations can compromise well-being in older adulthood. This study aimed to investigate the psychological mechanisms through which mobility limitations affect well-being and to evaluate how assistive technology might support these underlying processes among older adults.</p><p><p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Using data from the 2015-2017 rounds of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (<i>N</i> = 5,091), we conducted mediation analysis to determine if dispositional tenacity and flexibility in 2016 linked mobility limitations in 2015 to well-being in 2017. Moderation analysis evaluated whether assistive technology use in 2015 supported tenacity and flexibility in the subsequent year.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In 2015, 693 (13.6%) and 685 (13.5%) older adults reported mobility limitations when going outside and getting around inside, respectively. Mobility limitations had negative direct and indirect associations with well-being through pathways of reduced dispositional tenacity and flexibility. In the context of going outside, assistive technology use mitigated the impact of mobility limitation and supported the dual processes of tenacity and flexibility. However, for getting around inside, assistive technology use was associated with reduced dispositional tenacity and flexibility and further exacerbated the negative impact of mobility limitation.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the psychological mechanisms that connect mobility limitations to well-being. Findings suggest that deploying tailored assistive technology may protect older adults' well-being by supporting their psychological adaptation to age-related challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2221-2233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2494659\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2494659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:活动受限的经历会影响老年人的健康。本研究旨在探讨行动能力限制影响幸福感的心理机制,并评估辅助技术如何支持老年人的这些潜在过程。材料和方法:使用2015-2017年全国健康与老龄化趋势研究(N = 5091)的数据,我们进行了中介分析,以确定2016年的性格韧性和灵活性是否将2015年的流动性限制与2017年的幸福感联系起来。适度分析评估了2015年辅助技术的使用是否支持了次年的韧性和灵活性。结果:2015年,分别有693名(13.6%)和685名(13.5%)老年人报告外出和室内活动受限。通过降低性格韧性和灵活性的途径,流动性限制与幸福感有负向的直接和间接关联。在外出的背景下,辅助技术的使用减轻了行动限制的影响,并支持韧性和灵活性的双重过程。然而,对于室内活动,辅助技术的使用与处置韧性和灵活性的降低有关,并进一步加剧了行动限制的负面影响。结论:本研究强调了将行动能力限制与幸福感联系起来的心理机制。研究结果表明,部署量身定制的辅助技术可以通过支持老年人对年龄相关挑战的心理适应来保护老年人的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing well-being in later life: the interplay of mobility limitation, psychological adaptation, and assistive technology.

Purpose: The experience of mobility limitations can compromise well-being in older adulthood. This study aimed to investigate the psychological mechanisms through which mobility limitations affect well-being and to evaluate how assistive technology might support these underlying processes among older adults.

Materials and methods: Using data from the 2015-2017 rounds of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (N = 5,091), we conducted mediation analysis to determine if dispositional tenacity and flexibility in 2016 linked mobility limitations in 2015 to well-being in 2017. Moderation analysis evaluated whether assistive technology use in 2015 supported tenacity and flexibility in the subsequent year.

Results: In 2015, 693 (13.6%) and 685 (13.5%) older adults reported mobility limitations when going outside and getting around inside, respectively. Mobility limitations had negative direct and indirect associations with well-being through pathways of reduced dispositional tenacity and flexibility. In the context of going outside, assistive technology use mitigated the impact of mobility limitation and supported the dual processes of tenacity and flexibility. However, for getting around inside, assistive technology use was associated with reduced dispositional tenacity and flexibility and further exacerbated the negative impact of mobility limitation.

Conclusions: This study highlights the psychological mechanisms that connect mobility limitations to well-being. Findings suggest that deploying tailored assistive technology may protect older adults' well-being by supporting their psychological adaptation to age-related challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信