下肢神经减压治疗糖尿病合并周围神经病变:医学专业人员的认识。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Nadine Boers, Isabelle M L P Kamm, Manuel Castro Cabezas, Wynand B Melenhorst, Willem D Rinkel, J Henk Coert
{"title":"下肢神经减压治疗糖尿病合并周围神经病变:医学专业人员的认识。","authors":"Nadine Boers, Isabelle M L P Kamm, Manuel Castro Cabezas, Wynand B Melenhorst, Willem D Rinkel, J Henk Coert","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2009, a Dutch survey disclosed that 23% of medical professionals involved in diabetes care acknowledged the role of superimposed nerve compression in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) symptoms, although less than 10% were aware of the potential value of nerve decompression surgery. Our current aim was to assess whether awareness changed since this survey together with an updated review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, national, multi-institutional survey-based study was conducted among professionals from different specialties in the Netherlands including general practitioners, endocrinologists, neurologists, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, anesthesiologists, diabetes specialist nurses and podiatrists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 730 respondents, 84% confirmed their involvement in diabetes care. 57% (versus 23% in 2009) stated to be aware of the concept that superimposed nerve compressions play a role in the symptoms of DSP and 74% (previously: 60%) believed that this could be the case. In their communication to patients, 78% (versus 45%) of the professionals explained that DSP was irreversible. 30% (versus 3%) reported to refer patients to a surgeon. The reviewed literature reports an encouraging effect regarding pain reduction and PROMs, albeit with inconsistencies in outcomes related to sensibility (static one-point, two-point discrimination) and nerve conduction parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the last 13 years, studies reporting positive effects of surgery on both patient-reported outcomes and post-operative pain have raised an increased awareness on lower extremity neuropathy and LEND surgery with significantly more referrals to surgeons. However, long-term outcomes and appropriate patient selection criteria for LEND surgery are still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower extremity nerve decompression for superimposed peripheral neuropathy in diabetes: awareness among medical professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Nadine Boers, Isabelle M L P Kamm, Manuel Castro Cabezas, Wynand B Melenhorst, Willem D Rinkel, J Henk Coert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2009, a Dutch survey disclosed that 23% of medical professionals involved in diabetes care acknowledged the role of superimposed nerve compression in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) symptoms, although less than 10% were aware of the potential value of nerve decompression surgery. Our current aim was to assess whether awareness changed since this survey together with an updated review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, national, multi-institutional survey-based study was conducted among professionals from different specialties in the Netherlands including general practitioners, endocrinologists, neurologists, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, anesthesiologists, diabetes specialist nurses and podiatrists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 730 respondents, 84% confirmed their involvement in diabetes care. 57% (versus 23% in 2009) stated to be aware of the concept that superimposed nerve compressions play a role in the symptoms of DSP and 74% (previously: 60%) believed that this could be the case. In their communication to patients, 78% (versus 45%) of the professionals explained that DSP was irreversible. 30% (versus 3%) reported to refer patients to a surgeon. The reviewed literature reports an encouraging effect regarding pain reduction and PROMs, albeit with inconsistencies in outcomes related to sensibility (static one-point, two-point discrimination) and nerve conduction parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the last 13 years, studies reporting positive effects of surgery on both patient-reported outcomes and post-operative pain have raised an increased awareness on lower extremity neuropathy and LEND surgery with significantly more referrals to surgeons. However, long-term outcomes and appropriate patient selection criteria for LEND surgery are still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2009年,荷兰的一项调查显示,23%参与糖尿病护理的医疗专业人员承认叠加神经压迫在糖尿病感觉运动多神经病变(DSP)症状中的作用,尽管不到10%的人意识到神经减压手术的潜在价值。我们目前的目的是评估自这次调查以来人们的意识是否发生了变化,并对文献进行了最新的回顾。方法:一项横断面、全国性、多机构的调查研究对荷兰不同专业的专业人员进行了调查,包括全科医生、内分泌科医生、神经科医生、整形外科医生、血管外科医生、骨科医生、神经外科医生、麻醉科医生、糖尿病专科护士和足科医生。结果:在730名受访者中,84%的人确认他们参与了糖尿病护理。57%的人(2009年为23%)表示意识到叠加神经压迫在DSP症状中起作用的概念,74%的人(之前为60%)认为情况可能如此。在与患者的交流中,78% (vs . 45%)的专业人员解释说DSP是不可逆的。30%(对比3%)报告将患者转介给外科医生。所回顾的文献报告了疼痛减轻和prom的令人鼓舞的效果,尽管在敏感性(静态一点,两点辨别)和神经传导参数方面的结果不一致。结论:在过去的13年中,研究报告了手术对患者报告的结果和术后疼痛的积极影响,提高了人们对下肢神经病变和LEND手术的认识,并有更多的人转诊给外科医生。然而,LEND手术的长期预后和适当的患者选择标准仍然是需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lower extremity nerve decompression for superimposed peripheral neuropathy in diabetes: awareness among medical professionals.

Background: In 2009, a Dutch survey disclosed that 23% of medical professionals involved in diabetes care acknowledged the role of superimposed nerve compression in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) symptoms, although less than 10% were aware of the potential value of nerve decompression surgery. Our current aim was to assess whether awareness changed since this survey together with an updated review of the literature.

Methods: A cross-sectional, national, multi-institutional survey-based study was conducted among professionals from different specialties in the Netherlands including general practitioners, endocrinologists, neurologists, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, anesthesiologists, diabetes specialist nurses and podiatrists.

Results: Among the 730 respondents, 84% confirmed their involvement in diabetes care. 57% (versus 23% in 2009) stated to be aware of the concept that superimposed nerve compressions play a role in the symptoms of DSP and 74% (previously: 60%) believed that this could be the case. In their communication to patients, 78% (versus 45%) of the professionals explained that DSP was irreversible. 30% (versus 3%) reported to refer patients to a surgeon. The reviewed literature reports an encouraging effect regarding pain reduction and PROMs, albeit with inconsistencies in outcomes related to sensibility (static one-point, two-point discrimination) and nerve conduction parameters.

Conclusions: In the last 13 years, studies reporting positive effects of surgery on both patient-reported outcomes and post-operative pain have raised an increased awareness on lower extremity neuropathy and LEND surgery with significantly more referrals to surgeons. However, long-term outcomes and appropriate patient selection criteria for LEND surgery are still needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信