腹腔镜双口子宫肌瘤切除术:一种新型微创手术方法的回顾性病例系列。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Laura A Haworth, Lauren L Siewertsz van Reesema, Hannah S Palin, Zenobia Ofori-Dankwa, Jeffrey J Woo, Joseph L Hudgens
{"title":"腹腔镜双口子宫肌瘤切除术:一种新型微创手术方法的回顾性病例系列。","authors":"Laura A Haworth, Lauren L Siewertsz van Reesema, Hannah S Palin, Zenobia Ofori-Dankwa, Jeffrey J Woo, Joseph L Hudgens","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study presents a novel two-port technique for laparoscopic myomectomy, examining perioperative outcomes from 87 cases DESIGN: Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic hospital in Norfolk, Virginia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients who underwent two-port laparoscopic myomectomy over a six-year period, performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon. Cases were identified via current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for laparoscopic myomectomy.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The two-port technique uses a multi-port system at the umbilicus, a 45-degree bariatric laparoscope, and a 5-mm trocar in the right lower quadrant. This method reduces abdominal incisions, improves traction for fibroid removal, enhances triangulation for laparoscopic suturing, and expedites specimen extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven patients were included, with a mean age of 37.5 years (±5.2). The most common fibroid type was FIGO type 2-5. An average of 3.6 fibroids (±3.1) were removed per case. The mean dominant fibroid diameter was 5.2 cm (±2.3), and the mean total fibroid weight removed was 139.8 grams (±114.4). The mean EBL and operative time were 128 mL (±138.9) and 153 minutes (±45.9), respectively. Fibroid number and weight correlated with increasing operative time, while fibroid weight significantly correlated with higher EBL. No conversions to laparotomy occurred. Most patients (74.7%) were discharged on the same day.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two-port laparoscopic myomectomy is a safe and effective option for a variety of fibroid types, with outcome data comparable to previously reported data on conventional laparoscopic methods. This technique combines the benefits of traditional triangulation with improved cosmesis of single-site surgery, while providing a dedicated specimen extraction site. Candidates for two-port myomectomy are those eligible for a conventional laparoscopic approach; however, challenges may arise with intramural fibroids >10 cm, multiple fibroids (≥4), or need for multiple hysterotomy incisions, requiring careful patient selection and surgeon discretion.</p><p><strong>Summation: </strong>For properly selected patients, a two-port laparoscopic myomectomy technique is safe, effective, and associated with favorable outcomes, including a high same-day discharge rate and minimal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic two-port myomectomy-A retrospective case series of a novel minimally invasive approach.\",\"authors\":\"Laura A Haworth, Lauren L Siewertsz van Reesema, Hannah S Palin, Zenobia Ofori-Dankwa, Jeffrey J Woo, Joseph L Hudgens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study presents a novel two-port technique for laparoscopic myomectomy, examining perioperative outcomes from 87 cases DESIGN: Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic hospital in Norfolk, Virginia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients who underwent two-port laparoscopic myomectomy over a six-year period, performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon. Cases were identified via current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for laparoscopic myomectomy.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The two-port technique uses a multi-port system at the umbilicus, a 45-degree bariatric laparoscope, and a 5-mm trocar in the right lower quadrant. This method reduces abdominal incisions, improves traction for fibroid removal, enhances triangulation for laparoscopic suturing, and expedites specimen extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven patients were included, with a mean age of 37.5 years (±5.2). The most common fibroid type was FIGO type 2-5. An average of 3.6 fibroids (±3.1) were removed per case. The mean dominant fibroid diameter was 5.2 cm (±2.3), and the mean total fibroid weight removed was 139.8 grams (±114.4). The mean EBL and operative time were 128 mL (±138.9) and 153 minutes (±45.9), respectively. Fibroid number and weight correlated with increasing operative time, while fibroid weight significantly correlated with higher EBL. No conversions to laparotomy occurred. Most patients (74.7%) were discharged on the same day.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two-port laparoscopic myomectomy is a safe and effective option for a variety of fibroid types, with outcome data comparable to previously reported data on conventional laparoscopic methods. This technique combines the benefits of traditional triangulation with improved cosmesis of single-site surgery, while providing a dedicated specimen extraction site. Candidates for two-port myomectomy are those eligible for a conventional laparoscopic approach; however, challenges may arise with intramural fibroids >10 cm, multiple fibroids (≥4), or need for multiple hysterotomy incisions, requiring careful patient selection and surgeon discretion.</p><p><strong>Summation: </strong>For properly selected patients, a two-port laparoscopic myomectomy technique is safe, effective, and associated with favorable outcomes, including a high same-day discharge rate and minimal complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.05.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究介绍了一种新的双孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术技术,研究了87例患者的围手术期结果。地点:弗吉尼亚州诺福克的三级学术医院。参与者:在6年的时间里接受两孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的患者,由一名训练有素的外科医生进行手术。病例通过腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的现行程序术语(CPT)代码进行鉴定。干预措施:双端口技术使用脐多端口系统,45度减肥腹腔镜,右下象限5毫米套管针。这种方法减少了腹部切口,改善了肌瘤切除的牵引力,增强了腹腔镜缝合的三角剖分,并加快了标本的提取。结果:87例患者入组,平均年龄37.5岁(±5.2)岁。最常见的肌瘤类型为FIGO 2-5型。平均每例切除肌瘤3.6个(±3.1个)。平均优势肌瘤直径为5.2 cm(±2.3),平均切除总肌瘤重量为139.8 g(±114.4)。平均EBL为128 mL(±138.9),手术时间为153 min(±45.9)。肌瘤数量和重量与手术时间增加相关,肌瘤重量与EBL增高显著相关。未发生转剖腹手术。大多数患者(74.7%)当天出院。结论:双孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术是一种安全有效的选择,用于各种类型的肌瘤,其结果数据与先前报道的传统腹腔镜方法相当。该技术结合了传统三角剖分的优点和改进的单部位手术美观,同时提供了专用的标本提取部位。双端口子宫肌瘤切除术的候选人是那些符合常规腹腔镜方法的人;然而,当子宫肌瘤直径大于10厘米、多个肌瘤(≥4个)或需要多个子宫切开切口时,可能会出现挑战,需要仔细选择患者和外科医生。总结:对于适当选择的患者,双孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术技术是安全、有效的,并且具有良好的预后,包括高的当日出院率和最小的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic two-port myomectomy-A retrospective case series of a novel minimally invasive approach.

Objective: This study presents a novel two-port technique for laparoscopic myomectomy, examining perioperative outcomes from 87 cases DESIGN: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Tertiary academic hospital in Norfolk, Virginia.

Participants: Patients who underwent two-port laparoscopic myomectomy over a six-year period, performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon. Cases were identified via current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for laparoscopic myomectomy.

Interventions: The two-port technique uses a multi-port system at the umbilicus, a 45-degree bariatric laparoscope, and a 5-mm trocar in the right lower quadrant. This method reduces abdominal incisions, improves traction for fibroid removal, enhances triangulation for laparoscopic suturing, and expedites specimen extraction.

Results: Eighty-seven patients were included, with a mean age of 37.5 years (±5.2). The most common fibroid type was FIGO type 2-5. An average of 3.6 fibroids (±3.1) were removed per case. The mean dominant fibroid diameter was 5.2 cm (±2.3), and the mean total fibroid weight removed was 139.8 grams (±114.4). The mean EBL and operative time were 128 mL (±138.9) and 153 minutes (±45.9), respectively. Fibroid number and weight correlated with increasing operative time, while fibroid weight significantly correlated with higher EBL. No conversions to laparotomy occurred. Most patients (74.7%) were discharged on the same day.

Conclusion: Two-port laparoscopic myomectomy is a safe and effective option for a variety of fibroid types, with outcome data comparable to previously reported data on conventional laparoscopic methods. This technique combines the benefits of traditional triangulation with improved cosmesis of single-site surgery, while providing a dedicated specimen extraction site. Candidates for two-port myomectomy are those eligible for a conventional laparoscopic approach; however, challenges may arise with intramural fibroids >10 cm, multiple fibroids (≥4), or need for multiple hysterotomy incisions, requiring careful patient selection and surgeon discretion.

Summation: For properly selected patients, a two-port laparoscopic myomectomy technique is safe, effective, and associated with favorable outcomes, including a high same-day discharge rate and minimal complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信