多参数MRI的开源质量保证:磁共振生物标志物评估软件(MR-BIAS)的扩散分析更新。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
James C Korte, Stanley A Norris, Madeline E Carr, Lois Holloway, Glenn D Cahoon, Ben Neijndorff, Petra van Houdt, Rick Franich
{"title":"多参数MRI的开源质量保证:磁共振生物标志物评估软件(MR-BIAS)的扩散分析更新。","authors":"James C Korte, Stanley A Norris, Madeline E Carr, Lois Holloway, Glenn D Cahoon, Ben Neijndorff, Petra van Houdt, Rick Franich","doi":"10.1007/s10334-025-01252-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the automated analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion phantoms with an updated version of the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS), an open-source tool initially developed for the analysis of MRI relaxometry phantoms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The updated MR-BIAS was validated against two published diffusion weighted MRI datasets: (i) a single-site study (n = 48) was used for validation of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and to identify optimal region of interest (ROI) selection, and (ii) a multi-centre multi-vendor study including diffusion imaging from a shared benchmark protocol (n = 49) and site-specific protocols (n = 43). ADC analysis compared both datasets with ROIs manually matched to the original studies, and with automatically detected optimal ROIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MR-BIAS ADC values were statistically equivalent (p < 0.05) to original studies within tolerances (manual ROI, automatic ROI) for the single-site study (± 0.01, ± 6 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) and for the multi-vendor study for benchmark (± 4, ± 7 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) and site-specific (± 3, ± 6 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) protocols. The optimal ROI was a central cylinder (height = 10mm, diameter = 10mm). MR-BIAS ADC summary metrics were comparable to those of the original studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>MR-BIAS can automatically and accurately perform ADC analysis of diffusion phantoms, making the software suitable for the quality assurance of multi-centre studies of multi-parametric MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"639-651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-source quality assurance for multi-parametric MRI: a diffusion analysis update for the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS).\",\"authors\":\"James C Korte, Stanley A Norris, Madeline E Carr, Lois Holloway, Glenn D Cahoon, Ben Neijndorff, Petra van Houdt, Rick Franich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10334-025-01252-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the automated analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion phantoms with an updated version of the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS), an open-source tool initially developed for the analysis of MRI relaxometry phantoms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The updated MR-BIAS was validated against two published diffusion weighted MRI datasets: (i) a single-site study (n = 48) was used for validation of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and to identify optimal region of interest (ROI) selection, and (ii) a multi-centre multi-vendor study including diffusion imaging from a shared benchmark protocol (n = 49) and site-specific protocols (n = 43). ADC analysis compared both datasets with ROIs manually matched to the original studies, and with automatically detected optimal ROIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MR-BIAS ADC values were statistically equivalent (p < 0.05) to original studies within tolerances (manual ROI, automatic ROI) for the single-site study (± 0.01, ± 6 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) and for the multi-vendor study for benchmark (± 4, ± 7 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) and site-specific (± 3, ± 6 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) protocols. The optimal ROI was a central cylinder (height = 10mm, diameter = 10mm). MR-BIAS ADC summary metrics were comparable to those of the original studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>MR-BIAS can automatically and accurately perform ADC analysis of diffusion phantoms, making the software suitable for the quality assurance of multi-centre studies of multi-parametric MRI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"639-651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443916/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-025-01252-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-025-01252-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证磁共振生物标志物评估软件(MR-BIAS)的更新版本对磁共振成像(MRI)扩散幻象的自动分析。磁共振生物标志物评估软件(MR-BIAS)是一种最初用于分析MRI弛豫仪幻象的开源工具。材料和方法:更新的MR-BIAS针对两个已发表的弥散加权MRI数据集进行验证:(i)单点研究(n = 48)用于验证表观扩散系数(ADC)并确定最佳感兴趣区域(ROI)选择,以及(ii)多中心多供应商研究,包括共享基准协议(n = 49)和特定地点协议(n = 43)的弥散成像。ADC分析将两个数据集与人工匹配的原始研究roi和自动检测的最佳roi进行比较。结果:MR-BIAS ADC值在统计学上是相等的(p 2/s),对于多供应商研究的基准(±4,±7 μm2/s)和特定地点(±3,±6 μm2/s)协议。最佳ROI为中心圆柱体(高= 10mm,直径= 10mm)。MR-BIAS ADC总结指标与原始研究相当。讨论:MR-BIAS能够自动准确地对扩散模态进行ADC分析,适用于多参数MRI多中心研究的质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open-source quality assurance for multi-parametric MRI: a diffusion analysis update for the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS).

Objective: To validate the automated analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion phantoms with an updated version of the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS), an open-source tool initially developed for the analysis of MRI relaxometry phantoms.

Materials and methods: The updated MR-BIAS was validated against two published diffusion weighted MRI datasets: (i) a single-site study (n = 48) was used for validation of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and to identify optimal region of interest (ROI) selection, and (ii) a multi-centre multi-vendor study including diffusion imaging from a shared benchmark protocol (n = 49) and site-specific protocols (n = 43). ADC analysis compared both datasets with ROIs manually matched to the original studies, and with automatically detected optimal ROIs.

Results: MR-BIAS ADC values were statistically equivalent (p < 0.05) to original studies within tolerances (manual ROI, automatic ROI) for the single-site study (± 0.01, ± 6 μm2/s) and for the multi-vendor study for benchmark (± 4, ± 7 μm2/s) and site-specific (± 3, ± 6 μm2/s) protocols. The optimal ROI was a central cylinder (height = 10mm, diameter = 10mm). MR-BIAS ADC summary metrics were comparable to those of the original studies.

Discussion: MR-BIAS can automatically and accurately perform ADC analysis of diffusion phantoms, making the software suitable for the quality assurance of multi-centre studies of multi-parametric MRI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信