Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari, Bess Dawson-Hughes, John E Orav, Lisa Ceglia, Andreas Egli, Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher, Maud Wieczorek, Caroline de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino
{"title":"钙化二醇和胆钙化醇对绝经后妇女肌肉功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari, Bess Dawson-Hughes, John E Orav, Lisa Ceglia, Andreas Egli, Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher, Maud Wieczorek, Caroline de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino","doi":"10.1007/s00198-025-07456-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brief rationale: Limited evidence exists on calcifediol's effect on lower extremity function in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia.</p><p><strong>Main result: </strong>Calcifediol (20 µg/day) showed no greater benefit than vitamin D3 (3200 IU/day) or placebo. Significance of the paper: Findings do not support high-dose vitamin D3 or calcifediol for improving lower extremity function.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the effect of 20 µg/day of calcifediol compared with 3200 IU/day of vitamin D3 and placebo on lower extremity function in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a 3-arm double-blind RCT among postmenopausal women aged 50-70 years with serum 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL, and a DXA-based diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. Participants were randomized to receive either daily 20 µg calcifediol, daily 3200 IU vitamin D3, or placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite measure of lower extremity function, assessed at baseline, 3, and 6 months, including four tests: gait speed, knee flexor and extensor strength, and repeated sit-to-stand test. The primary endpoint was the probability of success (improvement or maintenance from baseline) in any of the eight tests, four tests at 3 months and four tests at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial enrolled 152 women (mean age, 61.0 years; mean serum 25(OH)D level, 23.4 ng/mL), and all but one woman completed all follow-up visits. Baseline characteristics, including the four tests of lower extremity function, were balanced across the three groups. The adjusted probability of success in any of the eight tests was 53.6% (95% confidence interval 47%, 60%) with calcifediol, 55.5% (50%, 61%) with vitamin D3, and 61.4% (55%, 67%) with placebo, without significant differences between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings do not support supplementation with daily calcifediol or equivalent high-dose daily vitamin D3 for improving or maintaining lower extremity function among younger postmenopausal women (age 50-70) with osteopenia or osteoporosis, who were pre-selected for vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency (25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL; baseline mean 25(OH)D 23.4 ng/mL).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02527668; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02527668.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":" ","pages":"1007-1018"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of calcifediol and cholecalciferol on muscle function in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari, Bess Dawson-Hughes, John E Orav, Lisa Ceglia, Andreas Egli, Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher, Maud Wieczorek, Caroline de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00198-025-07456-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Brief rationale: Limited evidence exists on calcifediol's effect on lower extremity function in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia.</p><p><strong>Main result: </strong>Calcifediol (20 µg/day) showed no greater benefit than vitamin D3 (3200 IU/day) or placebo. Significance of the paper: Findings do not support high-dose vitamin D3 or calcifediol for improving lower extremity function.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the effect of 20 µg/day of calcifediol compared with 3200 IU/day of vitamin D3 and placebo on lower extremity function in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a 3-arm double-blind RCT among postmenopausal women aged 50-70 years with serum 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL, and a DXA-based diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. Participants were randomized to receive either daily 20 µg calcifediol, daily 3200 IU vitamin D3, or placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite measure of lower extremity function, assessed at baseline, 3, and 6 months, including four tests: gait speed, knee flexor and extensor strength, and repeated sit-to-stand test. The primary endpoint was the probability of success (improvement or maintenance from baseline) in any of the eight tests, four tests at 3 months and four tests at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial enrolled 152 women (mean age, 61.0 years; mean serum 25(OH)D level, 23.4 ng/mL), and all but one woman completed all follow-up visits. Baseline characteristics, including the four tests of lower extremity function, were balanced across the three groups. The adjusted probability of success in any of the eight tests was 53.6% (95% confidence interval 47%, 60%) with calcifediol, 55.5% (50%, 61%) with vitamin D3, and 61.4% (55%, 67%) with placebo, without significant differences between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings do not support supplementation with daily calcifediol or equivalent high-dose daily vitamin D3 for improving or maintaining lower extremity function among younger postmenopausal women (age 50-70) with osteopenia or osteoporosis, who were pre-selected for vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency (25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL; baseline mean 25(OH)D 23.4 ng/mL).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02527668; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02527668.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoporosis International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1007-1018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122576/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoporosis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-025-07456-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-025-07456-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of calcifediol and cholecalciferol on muscle function in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.
Brief rationale: Limited evidence exists on calcifediol's effect on lower extremity function in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia.
Main result: Calcifediol (20 µg/day) showed no greater benefit than vitamin D3 (3200 IU/day) or placebo. Significance of the paper: Findings do not support high-dose vitamin D3 or calcifediol for improving lower extremity function.
Purpose: To test the effect of 20 µg/day of calcifediol compared with 3200 IU/day of vitamin D3 and placebo on lower extremity function in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis.
Methods: This is a 3-arm double-blind RCT among postmenopausal women aged 50-70 years with serum 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL, and a DXA-based diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. Participants were randomized to receive either daily 20 µg calcifediol, daily 3200 IU vitamin D3, or placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite measure of lower extremity function, assessed at baseline, 3, and 6 months, including four tests: gait speed, knee flexor and extensor strength, and repeated sit-to-stand test. The primary endpoint was the probability of success (improvement or maintenance from baseline) in any of the eight tests, four tests at 3 months and four tests at 6 months.
Results: The trial enrolled 152 women (mean age, 61.0 years; mean serum 25(OH)D level, 23.4 ng/mL), and all but one woman completed all follow-up visits. Baseline characteristics, including the four tests of lower extremity function, were balanced across the three groups. The adjusted probability of success in any of the eight tests was 53.6% (95% confidence interval 47%, 60%) with calcifediol, 55.5% (50%, 61%) with vitamin D3, and 61.4% (55%, 67%) with placebo, without significant differences between treatment groups.
Conclusions: Our findings do not support supplementation with daily calcifediol or equivalent high-dose daily vitamin D3 for improving or maintaining lower extremity function among younger postmenopausal women (age 50-70) with osteopenia or osteoporosis, who were pre-selected for vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency (25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL; baseline mean 25(OH)D 23.4 ng/mL).
期刊介绍:
An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases.
It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition.
While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.