关节镜与开放手术治疗脓毒性膝关节炎的比较结果:一项回顾性研究。

Tribhuwan Narayan Singh Gaur, Maneesh Verma, Mayank Pratap Singh, Deepak S Maravi, Dhruvkumar Rakeshkumar Agrawal, Ajay Dhanopeya
{"title":"关节镜与开放手术治疗脓毒性膝关节炎的比较结果:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Tribhuwan Narayan Singh Gaur, Maneesh Verma, Mayank Pratap Singh, Deepak S Maravi, Dhruvkumar Rakeshkumar Agrawal, Ajay Dhanopeya","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Septic arthritis (SA) of the knee is a serious condition requiring prompt intervention. The choice between arthroscopic and open surgical approaches remains debated. This study compares the clinical outcomes of these two surgical techniques in the treatment of knee SA. The primary objective was to compare the need for additional surgical interventions between the arthroscopic and open surgery groups. Secondary outcomes included a range of motion (ROM), pain reduction, functional improvement, and infection control as measured by total leukocyte count (TLC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 32 adult patients diagnosed with acute native knee SA who underwent either arthroscopic or open surgical irrigation between January 2022 and November 2024 at an Indian Government Medical College. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory results, and surgical details were collected. Postoperatively, patients were assessed for ROM, pain reduction (Visual Analog Scale), functional improvement (WOMAC), and TLC. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi v2.3.28.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The arthroscopic group (n = 20) had a significantly younger mean age (35.4 ± 11.0 years) compared to the open surgery group (n = 12, 48.9 ± 10.6 years). Both groups showed significant improvement in joint function, ROM, pain reduction, and disability scores, with no significant difference between groups. The relapse rate was slightly higher in the open surgery group (33.3%) compared to the arthroscopic group (25%), but the difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical outcomes of both arthroscopic and open surgical approaches were equivocal, with both techniques leading to significant improvements in knee function, ROM, pain reduction, and overall disability. Arthroscopy is recommended as a first-line option for younger or less severely affected patients, whereas open surgery remains necessary for complex cases. Further studies are needed to refine treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 5","pages":"300-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Outcomes of Arthroscopic versus Open Surgical Approaches in the Management of Septic Arthritis of the Knee: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tribhuwan Narayan Singh Gaur, Maneesh Verma, Mayank Pratap Singh, Deepak S Maravi, Dhruvkumar Rakeshkumar Agrawal, Ajay Dhanopeya\",\"doi\":\"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Septic arthritis (SA) of the knee is a serious condition requiring prompt intervention. The choice between arthroscopic and open surgical approaches remains debated. This study compares the clinical outcomes of these two surgical techniques in the treatment of knee SA. The primary objective was to compare the need for additional surgical interventions between the arthroscopic and open surgery groups. Secondary outcomes included a range of motion (ROM), pain reduction, functional improvement, and infection control as measured by total leukocyte count (TLC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 32 adult patients diagnosed with acute native knee SA who underwent either arthroscopic or open surgical irrigation between January 2022 and November 2024 at an Indian Government Medical College. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory results, and surgical details were collected. Postoperatively, patients were assessed for ROM, pain reduction (Visual Analog Scale), functional improvement (WOMAC), and TLC. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi v2.3.28.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The arthroscopic group (n = 20) had a significantly younger mean age (35.4 ± 11.0 years) compared to the open surgery group (n = 12, 48.9 ± 10.6 years). Both groups showed significant improvement in joint function, ROM, pain reduction, and disability scores, with no significant difference between groups. The relapse rate was slightly higher in the open surgery group (33.3%) compared to the arthroscopic group (25%), but the difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical outcomes of both arthroscopic and open surgical approaches were equivocal, with both techniques leading to significant improvements in knee function, ROM, pain reduction, and overall disability. Arthroscopy is recommended as a first-line option for younger or less severely affected patients, whereas open surgery remains necessary for complex cases. Further studies are needed to refine treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"300-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:化脓性膝关节炎(SA)是一种严重的疾病,需要及时干预。关节镜手术和开放手术的选择仍有争议。本研究比较了这两种手术技术治疗膝关节SA的临床结果。主要目的是比较关节镜组和开放手术组对额外手术干预的需求。次要结果包括活动范围(ROM)、疼痛减轻、功能改善和感染控制(通过总白细胞计数(TLC)测量)。材料和方法:这项回顾性研究包括32名确诊为急性原生膝关节SA的成年患者,这些患者于2022年1月至2024年11月在印度政府医学院接受了关节镜或开放性手术冲洗。收集了人口统计学、临床表现、实验室结果和手术细节的数据。术后,对患者进行ROM、疼痛减轻(视觉模拟量表)、功能改善(WOMAC)和TLC评估。采用Jamovi v2.3.28软件进行统计分析。结果:关节镜组(n = 20)的平均年龄(35.4±11.0岁)明显低于开放手术组(n = 12, 48.9±10.6岁)。两组在关节功能、关节活动度、疼痛减轻和残疾评分方面均有显著改善,组间无显著差异。开放性手术组复发率(33.3%)略高于关节镜组(25%),但差异无统计学意义。结论:关节镜和开放手术入路的临床结果都是模棱两可的,两种技术都能显著改善膝关节功能、ROM、疼痛减轻和整体残疾。关节镜检查被推荐作为年轻或不太严重的患者的一线选择,而对于复杂的病例,开放手术仍然是必要的。需要进一步的研究来完善治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Outcomes of Arthroscopic versus Open Surgical Approaches in the Management of Septic Arthritis of the Knee: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Septic arthritis (SA) of the knee is a serious condition requiring prompt intervention. The choice between arthroscopic and open surgical approaches remains debated. This study compares the clinical outcomes of these two surgical techniques in the treatment of knee SA. The primary objective was to compare the need for additional surgical interventions between the arthroscopic and open surgery groups. Secondary outcomes included a range of motion (ROM), pain reduction, functional improvement, and infection control as measured by total leukocyte count (TLC).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 32 adult patients diagnosed with acute native knee SA who underwent either arthroscopic or open surgical irrigation between January 2022 and November 2024 at an Indian Government Medical College. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory results, and surgical details were collected. Postoperatively, patients were assessed for ROM, pain reduction (Visual Analog Scale), functional improvement (WOMAC), and TLC. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi v2.3.28.

Result: The arthroscopic group (n = 20) had a significantly younger mean age (35.4 ± 11.0 years) compared to the open surgery group (n = 12, 48.9 ± 10.6 years). Both groups showed significant improvement in joint function, ROM, pain reduction, and disability scores, with no significant difference between groups. The relapse rate was slightly higher in the open surgery group (33.3%) compared to the arthroscopic group (25%), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of both arthroscopic and open surgical approaches were equivocal, with both techniques leading to significant improvements in knee function, ROM, pain reduction, and overall disability. Arthroscopy is recommended as a first-line option for younger or less severely affected patients, whereas open surgery remains necessary for complex cases. Further studies are needed to refine treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信