卫生保健工作者对非甾体抗炎药超敏反应的知识和实践评估:一项基于横断面病例的调查。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yan Teo, Mohammed Faizal Bakhtiar, Zareen Aidah Yahya, Siew Mei Sim, Nor Asiah Muhamad, Min Moon Tang
{"title":"卫生保健工作者对非甾体抗炎药超敏反应的知识和实践评估:一项基于横断面病例的调查。","authors":"Yan Teo, Mohammed Faizal Bakhtiar, Zareen Aidah Yahya, Siew Mei Sim, Nor Asiah Muhamad, Min Moon Tang","doi":"10.1111/imj.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs hypersensitivity reactions (NHRs) are one of the most common drug hypersensitivity reactions encountered in clinical practice. The ability of healthcare workers (HCWs) to recognise, classify and manage NHRs is important for patients' safety.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to assess HCWs' knowledge and practices (KPs) on NHRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional online questionnaire case-based study on NHRs, involving clinical HCWs at two tertiary hospitals in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 respondents comprising 217 doctors and 30 clinical pharmacists, aged between 24 and 49 years, were recruited. Overall, only 15.8% of the HCWs had adequate KPs on NHRs. Years of clinical experience (≤10 vs >10 years) were significantly associated with adequacy of NHR knowledge (odds ratio: 0.17 (confidence interval: 0.08-0.35), P < 0.05). On average, the dermatology-specialised doctors scored better than other groups, with 58.7% (n = 25) answering correctly. Comparatively, this group also performed better in diagnosing and categorising NHRs, at 81.9%. When compared to the dermatology-specialised group, clinical pharmacists, non-dermatology specialised doctors and non-specialised doctors were six, 16 and 41 times more likely to have inadequate knowledge on NHRs respectively. The overall knowledge on the management of NHRs was poor across the groups (31%, n = 77). Interestingly, 57.1% (n = 141) of overall respondents thought that prescribing adrenaline autoinjectors was needed for anaphylaxis secondary to drugs, and 29.6% were still unaware of the utilisation of serum tryptase in confirming anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall KPs of HCWs' on NHRs were found to be inadequate, specifically in their management. Increased efforts on periodic educational programmes for HCWs on NHRs are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of knowledge and practices of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional case-based survey.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Teo, Mohammed Faizal Bakhtiar, Zareen Aidah Yahya, Siew Mei Sim, Nor Asiah Muhamad, Min Moon Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs hypersensitivity reactions (NHRs) are one of the most common drug hypersensitivity reactions encountered in clinical practice. The ability of healthcare workers (HCWs) to recognise, classify and manage NHRs is important for patients' safety.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to assess HCWs' knowledge and practices (KPs) on NHRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional online questionnaire case-based study on NHRs, involving clinical HCWs at two tertiary hospitals in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 respondents comprising 217 doctors and 30 clinical pharmacists, aged between 24 and 49 years, were recruited. Overall, only 15.8% of the HCWs had adequate KPs on NHRs. Years of clinical experience (≤10 vs >10 years) were significantly associated with adequacy of NHR knowledge (odds ratio: 0.17 (confidence interval: 0.08-0.35), P < 0.05). On average, the dermatology-specialised doctors scored better than other groups, with 58.7% (n = 25) answering correctly. Comparatively, this group also performed better in diagnosing and categorising NHRs, at 81.9%. When compared to the dermatology-specialised group, clinical pharmacists, non-dermatology specialised doctors and non-specialised doctors were six, 16 and 41 times more likely to have inadequate knowledge on NHRs respectively. The overall knowledge on the management of NHRs was poor across the groups (31%, n = 77). Interestingly, 57.1% (n = 141) of overall respondents thought that prescribing adrenaline autoinjectors was needed for anaphylaxis secondary to drugs, and 29.6% were still unaware of the utilisation of serum tryptase in confirming anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall KPs of HCWs' on NHRs were found to be inadequate, specifically in their management. Increased efforts on periodic educational programmes for HCWs on NHRs are urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非甾体抗炎药超敏反应(NHRs)是临床最常见的药物超敏反应之一。卫生保健工作者(HCWs)识别、分类和管理nhr的能力对患者的安全很重要。目的:本研究旨在评估卫生保健工作者在国家卫生保健方面的知识和实践。方法:这是一项基于病例的横断面在线问卷研究,涉及马来西亚两家三级医院的临床卫生保健员。结果:共纳入调查对象247人,其中医生217人,临床药师30人,年龄24 ~ 49岁。总体而言,只有15.8%的卫生保健员有足够的卫生保健指标。临床经验年数(≤10年vs≤10年)与NHR知识的充分性显著相关(优势比:0.17(置信区间:0.08-0.35)。结论:HCWs对NHR的总体KPs存在不足,特别是在管理方面。迫切需要加强对卫生保健工作者关于国家人权的定期教育方案的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of knowledge and practices of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional case-based survey.

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs hypersensitivity reactions (NHRs) are one of the most common drug hypersensitivity reactions encountered in clinical practice. The ability of healthcare workers (HCWs) to recognise, classify and manage NHRs is important for patients' safety.

Aims: The study aimed to assess HCWs' knowledge and practices (KPs) on NHRs.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional online questionnaire case-based study on NHRs, involving clinical HCWs at two tertiary hospitals in Malaysia.

Results: A total of 247 respondents comprising 217 doctors and 30 clinical pharmacists, aged between 24 and 49 years, were recruited. Overall, only 15.8% of the HCWs had adequate KPs on NHRs. Years of clinical experience (≤10 vs >10 years) were significantly associated with adequacy of NHR knowledge (odds ratio: 0.17 (confidence interval: 0.08-0.35), P < 0.05). On average, the dermatology-specialised doctors scored better than other groups, with 58.7% (n = 25) answering correctly. Comparatively, this group also performed better in diagnosing and categorising NHRs, at 81.9%. When compared to the dermatology-specialised group, clinical pharmacists, non-dermatology specialised doctors and non-specialised doctors were six, 16 and 41 times more likely to have inadequate knowledge on NHRs respectively. The overall knowledge on the management of NHRs was poor across the groups (31%, n = 77). Interestingly, 57.1% (n = 141) of overall respondents thought that prescribing adrenaline autoinjectors was needed for anaphylaxis secondary to drugs, and 29.6% were still unaware of the utilisation of serum tryptase in confirming anaphylaxis.

Conclusions: The overall KPs of HCWs' on NHRs were found to be inadequate, specifically in their management. Increased efforts on periodic educational programmes for HCWs on NHRs are urgently needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信