Yan Teo, Mohammed Faizal Bakhtiar, Zareen Aidah Yahya, Siew Mei Sim, Nor Asiah Muhamad, Min Moon Tang
{"title":"卫生保健工作者对非甾体抗炎药超敏反应的知识和实践评估:一项基于横断面病例的调查。","authors":"Yan Teo, Mohammed Faizal Bakhtiar, Zareen Aidah Yahya, Siew Mei Sim, Nor Asiah Muhamad, Min Moon Tang","doi":"10.1111/imj.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs hypersensitivity reactions (NHRs) are one of the most common drug hypersensitivity reactions encountered in clinical practice. The ability of healthcare workers (HCWs) to recognise, classify and manage NHRs is important for patients' safety.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to assess HCWs' knowledge and practices (KPs) on NHRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional online questionnaire case-based study on NHRs, involving clinical HCWs at two tertiary hospitals in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 respondents comprising 217 doctors and 30 clinical pharmacists, aged between 24 and 49 years, were recruited. Overall, only 15.8% of the HCWs had adequate KPs on NHRs. Years of clinical experience (≤10 vs >10 years) were significantly associated with adequacy of NHR knowledge (odds ratio: 0.17 (confidence interval: 0.08-0.35), P < 0.05). On average, the dermatology-specialised doctors scored better than other groups, with 58.7% (n = 25) answering correctly. Comparatively, this group also performed better in diagnosing and categorising NHRs, at 81.9%. When compared to the dermatology-specialised group, clinical pharmacists, non-dermatology specialised doctors and non-specialised doctors were six, 16 and 41 times more likely to have inadequate knowledge on NHRs respectively. The overall knowledge on the management of NHRs was poor across the groups (31%, n = 77). Interestingly, 57.1% (n = 141) of overall respondents thought that prescribing adrenaline autoinjectors was needed for anaphylaxis secondary to drugs, and 29.6% were still unaware of the utilisation of serum tryptase in confirming anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall KPs of HCWs' on NHRs were found to be inadequate, specifically in their management. Increased efforts on periodic educational programmes for HCWs on NHRs are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of knowledge and practices of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional case-based survey.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Teo, Mohammed Faizal Bakhtiar, Zareen Aidah Yahya, Siew Mei Sim, Nor Asiah Muhamad, Min Moon Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs hypersensitivity reactions (NHRs) are one of the most common drug hypersensitivity reactions encountered in clinical practice. The ability of healthcare workers (HCWs) to recognise, classify and manage NHRs is important for patients' safety.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to assess HCWs' knowledge and practices (KPs) on NHRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional online questionnaire case-based study on NHRs, involving clinical HCWs at two tertiary hospitals in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 respondents comprising 217 doctors and 30 clinical pharmacists, aged between 24 and 49 years, were recruited. Overall, only 15.8% of the HCWs had adequate KPs on NHRs. Years of clinical experience (≤10 vs >10 years) were significantly associated with adequacy of NHR knowledge (odds ratio: 0.17 (confidence interval: 0.08-0.35), P < 0.05). On average, the dermatology-specialised doctors scored better than other groups, with 58.7% (n = 25) answering correctly. Comparatively, this group also performed better in diagnosing and categorising NHRs, at 81.9%. When compared to the dermatology-specialised group, clinical pharmacists, non-dermatology specialised doctors and non-specialised doctors were six, 16 and 41 times more likely to have inadequate knowledge on NHRs respectively. The overall knowledge on the management of NHRs was poor across the groups (31%, n = 77). Interestingly, 57.1% (n = 141) of overall respondents thought that prescribing adrenaline autoinjectors was needed for anaphylaxis secondary to drugs, and 29.6% were still unaware of the utilisation of serum tryptase in confirming anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall KPs of HCWs' on NHRs were found to be inadequate, specifically in their management. Increased efforts on periodic educational programmes for HCWs on NHRs are urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of knowledge and practices of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional case-based survey.
Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs hypersensitivity reactions (NHRs) are one of the most common drug hypersensitivity reactions encountered in clinical practice. The ability of healthcare workers (HCWs) to recognise, classify and manage NHRs is important for patients' safety.
Aims: The study aimed to assess HCWs' knowledge and practices (KPs) on NHRs.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional online questionnaire case-based study on NHRs, involving clinical HCWs at two tertiary hospitals in Malaysia.
Results: A total of 247 respondents comprising 217 doctors and 30 clinical pharmacists, aged between 24 and 49 years, were recruited. Overall, only 15.8% of the HCWs had adequate KPs on NHRs. Years of clinical experience (≤10 vs >10 years) were significantly associated with adequacy of NHR knowledge (odds ratio: 0.17 (confidence interval: 0.08-0.35), P < 0.05). On average, the dermatology-specialised doctors scored better than other groups, with 58.7% (n = 25) answering correctly. Comparatively, this group also performed better in diagnosing and categorising NHRs, at 81.9%. When compared to the dermatology-specialised group, clinical pharmacists, non-dermatology specialised doctors and non-specialised doctors were six, 16 and 41 times more likely to have inadequate knowledge on NHRs respectively. The overall knowledge on the management of NHRs was poor across the groups (31%, n = 77). Interestingly, 57.1% (n = 141) of overall respondents thought that prescribing adrenaline autoinjectors was needed for anaphylaxis secondary to drugs, and 29.6% were still unaware of the utilisation of serum tryptase in confirming anaphylaxis.
Conclusions: The overall KPs of HCWs' on NHRs were found to be inadequate, specifically in their management. Increased efforts on periodic educational programmes for HCWs on NHRs are urgently needed.
期刊介绍:
The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.