一项评估炎症性肠病患者回避/限制性食物摄入障碍的多中心研究

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Laurie B Grossberg, Kajali Mishra, Loren G Rabinowitz, Benjamin Mecsas-Faxon, Nivedita Mandal, Ammu Susheela, Amar Naik, Krishna Patel, Marissa Gallotto, Tara Greenwood, Helen Burton Murray, Konstantinos Papamichael, Adam S Cheifetz, Sarah W Kinsinger, Sarah Ballou
{"title":"一项评估炎症性肠病患者回避/限制性食物摄入障碍的多中心研究","authors":"Laurie B Grossberg, Kajali Mishra, Loren G Rabinowitz, Benjamin Mecsas-Faxon, Nivedita Mandal, Ammu Susheela, Amar Naik, Krishna Patel, Marissa Gallotto, Tara Greenwood, Helen Burton Murray, Konstantinos Papamichael, Adam S Cheifetz, Sarah W Kinsinger, Sarah Ballou","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Disordered eating is frequently reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to describe the prevalence of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in patients with IBD and to identify predictors of ARFID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with IBD at 2 academic medical centers completed questionnaires including the ARFID subscale of the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q), disease characteristics, and psychosocial variables. IBD disease activity was determined by a review of objective data within 90 days of survey completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and twenty-five participants completed the questionnaires (56% female, average age 47.60 years, 49.5% Crohn's disease (CD), 45.5% ulcerative colitis (UC)). Using the PARDI-AR-Q, 17.8% of the total sample screened positive for ARFID. ARFID+ respondents were younger, had shorter disease duration, and worse psychosocial functioning compared to ARFID-. A higher percentage of ARFID+ patients had objective disease activity compared to ARFID- (51% vs. 40%), but this was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in ARFID rates between patients with CD compared to UC. In patients with inactive disease only, 16.3% screened positive for ARFID. In hierarchical logistic regression, the only significant predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD was GI-specific anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this multi-center study, 16.3% of patients with inactive IBD met the criteria for ARFID, and 17.8% of all patients met the criteria regardless of objective disease activity. GI-specific anxiety was the only predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care in IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"2381-2389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multicenter Study to Assess Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Laurie B Grossberg, Kajali Mishra, Loren G Rabinowitz, Benjamin Mecsas-Faxon, Nivedita Mandal, Ammu Susheela, Amar Naik, Krishna Patel, Marissa Gallotto, Tara Greenwood, Helen Burton Murray, Konstantinos Papamichael, Adam S Cheifetz, Sarah W Kinsinger, Sarah Ballou\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ibd/izaf016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Disordered eating is frequently reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to describe the prevalence of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in patients with IBD and to identify predictors of ARFID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with IBD at 2 academic medical centers completed questionnaires including the ARFID subscale of the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q), disease characteristics, and psychosocial variables. IBD disease activity was determined by a review of objective data within 90 days of survey completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and twenty-five participants completed the questionnaires (56% female, average age 47.60 years, 49.5% Crohn's disease (CD), 45.5% ulcerative colitis (UC)). Using the PARDI-AR-Q, 17.8% of the total sample screened positive for ARFID. ARFID+ respondents were younger, had shorter disease duration, and worse psychosocial functioning compared to ARFID-. A higher percentage of ARFID+ patients had objective disease activity compared to ARFID- (51% vs. 40%), but this was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in ARFID rates between patients with CD compared to UC. In patients with inactive disease only, 16.3% screened positive for ARFID. In hierarchical logistic regression, the only significant predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD was GI-specific anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this multi-center study, 16.3% of patients with inactive IBD met the criteria for ARFID, and 17.8% of all patients met the criteria regardless of objective disease activity. GI-specific anxiety was the only predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care in IBD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2381-2389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455582/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:炎症性肠病(IBD)患者经常报道饮食失调。我们的目的是描述IBD患者中回避性限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)的患病率,并确定ARFID的预测因素。方法:2个学术医疗中心的IBD患者完成问卷调查,包括异食癖ARFID子量表、ARFID和反刍障碍问卷(PARDI-AR-Q)、疾病特征和社会心理变量。通过对调查完成后90天内客观数据的回顾来确定IBD疾病活动性。结果:325名参与者完成了问卷调查,其中56%为女性,平均年龄47.60岁,49.5%为克罗恩病(CD), 45.5%为溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。使用PARDI-AR-Q, 17.8%的总样本ARFID筛选阳性。与ARFID-相比,ARFID+的应答者更年轻,病程更短,心理社会功能更差。与ARFID-患者相比,ARFID+患者有客观疾病活动的比例更高(51%对40%),但这没有统计学意义。与UC患者相比,CD患者ARFID发生率无统计学差异。仅在非活动性疾病患者中,16.3%的ARFID筛查呈阳性。在分层逻辑回归中,非活动性IBD患者ARFID的唯一显著预测因子是gi特异性焦虑。结论:在这项多中心研究中,16.3%的非活动性IBD患者符合ARFID标准,17.8%的患者符合ARFID标准,无论客观疾病活动性如何。gi特异性焦虑是非活动性IBD患者ARFID的唯一预测因子,强调了IBD多学科治疗的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multicenter Study to Assess Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background and aims: Disordered eating is frequently reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to describe the prevalence of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in patients with IBD and to identify predictors of ARFID.

Methods: Patients with IBD at 2 academic medical centers completed questionnaires including the ARFID subscale of the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q), disease characteristics, and psychosocial variables. IBD disease activity was determined by a review of objective data within 90 days of survey completion.

Results: Three hundred and twenty-five participants completed the questionnaires (56% female, average age 47.60 years, 49.5% Crohn's disease (CD), 45.5% ulcerative colitis (UC)). Using the PARDI-AR-Q, 17.8% of the total sample screened positive for ARFID. ARFID+ respondents were younger, had shorter disease duration, and worse psychosocial functioning compared to ARFID-. A higher percentage of ARFID+ patients had objective disease activity compared to ARFID- (51% vs. 40%), but this was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in ARFID rates between patients with CD compared to UC. In patients with inactive disease only, 16.3% screened positive for ARFID. In hierarchical logistic regression, the only significant predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD was GI-specific anxiety.

Conclusions: In this multi-center study, 16.3% of patients with inactive IBD met the criteria for ARFID, and 17.8% of all patients met the criteria regardless of objective disease activity. GI-specific anxiety was the only predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care in IBD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信