创建qDASH和PRWHE分数转换的通用量表。

IF 1.6
Mary R Harvey, Jeremy Rodrigues, Jane E McEachan, Conrad Harrison
{"title":"创建qDASH和PRWHE分数转换的通用量表。","authors":"Mary R Harvey, Jeremy Rodrigues, Jane E McEachan, Conrad Harrison","doi":"10.1177/17531934251331033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation are two outcome measures used commonly in hand surgery. We evaluated the structural validity of these two outcome measures using item response theory and then developed a common scale that both outcome scores could be mapped to. Factor analysis found that both outcome measures assess the same two health constructs: 'Pain' and 'Motor Function'. We developed two separate common scales for both subscales. Frequency density plots and Bland-Altman analysis suggested that these can be used to compare the scores of one instrument to the other. We present a look-up table allowing readers to map sum-scores from these outcome measures onto the common scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"1215-1224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating a common scale for the conversion of qDASH and PRWHE scores.\",\"authors\":\"Mary R Harvey, Jeremy Rodrigues, Jane E McEachan, Conrad Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17531934251331033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation are two outcome measures used commonly in hand surgery. We evaluated the structural validity of these two outcome measures using item response theory and then developed a common scale that both outcome scores could be mapped to. Factor analysis found that both outcome measures assess the same two health constructs: 'Pain' and 'Motor Function'. We developed two separate common scales for both subscales. Frequency density plots and Bland-Altman analysis suggested that these can be used to compare the scores of one instrument to the other. We present a look-up table allowing readers to map sum-scores from these outcome measures onto the common scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1215-1224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251331033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251331033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾问卷和患者评定手腕和手的评估是手外科手术中常用的两种结果测量方法。我们使用项目反应理论评估了这两个结果测量的结构效度,然后开发了一个共同的量表,这两个结果得分都可以映射到。因素分析发现,这两种结果测量方法评估的是相同的两个健康结构:“疼痛”和“运动功能”。我们为这两个子量表开发了两个独立的通用量表。频率密度图和Bland-Altman分析表明,这些可以用来比较一种乐器与另一种乐器的分数。我们提供了一个查找表,允许读者将这些结果测量的总和分数映射到共同的尺度上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creating a common scale for the conversion of qDASH and PRWHE scores.

The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation are two outcome measures used commonly in hand surgery. We evaluated the structural validity of these two outcome measures using item response theory and then developed a common scale that both outcome scores could be mapped to. Factor analysis found that both outcome measures assess the same two health constructs: 'Pain' and 'Motor Function'. We developed two separate common scales for both subscales. Frequency density plots and Bland-Altman analysis suggested that these can be used to compare the scores of one instrument to the other. We present a look-up table allowing readers to map sum-scores from these outcome measures onto the common scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信