{"title":"在18F-FDG PET图像上使用机器学习评估淀粉样蛋白PET阳性。","authors":"Takahiro Yamada, Yuichi Kimura, Shogo Watanabe, Aya Watanabe, Misa Honda, Takashi Nagaoka, Mitsutaka Nemoto, Kohei Hanaoka, Hayato Kaida, Yasuyuki Kojita, Minoru Yamada, SungWoon Im, Atsushi Kono, Kazunari Ishii","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01789-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the approval of disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease, the demand for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scans, which are crucial for determining treatment eligibility, is expected to increase significantly. We thus investigated the ability of an algorithm to predict amyloid accumulation from <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET images for use in amyloid PET screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the images of 194 subjects with cognitive disorders who had undergone brain FDG-PET, amyloid PET using Pittsburgh compound-B (<sup>11</sup>C-PiB), and MRI scans at Kindai University Hospital between 2011 and 2018. Among them, 108 subjects showed positive amyloid accumulation; the other 86 did not. For the 108 positive cases, the input values were the region of interest-based calculated from the automatic anatomical labeling template, which divides the brain into 120 regions, and applied to the anatomically standardized FDG-PET images of each subject. We then used a support vector machine (SVM) machine learning algorithm and conducted a tenfold cross-validation to assess the algorithm's accuracy for predicting amyloid accumulation from FDG-PET images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 81.5% accuracy, 78.5% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846 during training. The validation results for the trained model revealed 85.9% accuracy, 88.4% sensitivity, 81.0% specificity, and an AUC of 0.918.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that the performance of our algorithm to predict amyloid accumulation from <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET images is adequate for use in amyloid PET scan screenings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1541-1549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of amyloid PET positivity using machine learning on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET images.\",\"authors\":\"Takahiro Yamada, Yuichi Kimura, Shogo Watanabe, Aya Watanabe, Misa Honda, Takashi Nagaoka, Mitsutaka Nemoto, Kohei Hanaoka, Hayato Kaida, Yasuyuki Kojita, Minoru Yamada, SungWoon Im, Atsushi Kono, Kazunari Ishii\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-025-01789-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the approval of disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease, the demand for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scans, which are crucial for determining treatment eligibility, is expected to increase significantly. We thus investigated the ability of an algorithm to predict amyloid accumulation from <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET images for use in amyloid PET screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the images of 194 subjects with cognitive disorders who had undergone brain FDG-PET, amyloid PET using Pittsburgh compound-B (<sup>11</sup>C-PiB), and MRI scans at Kindai University Hospital between 2011 and 2018. Among them, 108 subjects showed positive amyloid accumulation; the other 86 did not. For the 108 positive cases, the input values were the region of interest-based calculated from the automatic anatomical labeling template, which divides the brain into 120 regions, and applied to the anatomically standardized FDG-PET images of each subject. We then used a support vector machine (SVM) machine learning algorithm and conducted a tenfold cross-validation to assess the algorithm's accuracy for predicting amyloid accumulation from FDG-PET images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 81.5% accuracy, 78.5% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846 during training. The validation results for the trained model revealed 85.9% accuracy, 88.4% sensitivity, 81.0% specificity, and an AUC of 0.918.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that the performance of our algorithm to predict amyloid accumulation from <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET images is adequate for use in amyloid PET scan screenings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1541-1549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01789-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01789-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of amyloid PET positivity using machine learning on 18F-FDG PET images.
Background: Since the approval of disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease, the demand for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scans, which are crucial for determining treatment eligibility, is expected to increase significantly. We thus investigated the ability of an algorithm to predict amyloid accumulation from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET images for use in amyloid PET screening.
Methods: We analyzed the images of 194 subjects with cognitive disorders who had undergone brain FDG-PET, amyloid PET using Pittsburgh compound-B (11C-PiB), and MRI scans at Kindai University Hospital between 2011 and 2018. Among them, 108 subjects showed positive amyloid accumulation; the other 86 did not. For the 108 positive cases, the input values were the region of interest-based calculated from the automatic anatomical labeling template, which divides the brain into 120 regions, and applied to the anatomically standardized FDG-PET images of each subject. We then used a support vector machine (SVM) machine learning algorithm and conducted a tenfold cross-validation to assess the algorithm's accuracy for predicting amyloid accumulation from FDG-PET images.
Results: We observed 81.5% accuracy, 78.5% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846 during training. The validation results for the trained model revealed 85.9% accuracy, 88.4% sensitivity, 81.0% specificity, and an AUC of 0.918.
Conclusion: These results indicate that the performance of our algorithm to predict amyloid accumulation from 18FDG-PET images is adequate for use in amyloid PET scan screenings.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.