深度学习重建胰腺弥散加权成像(DWI)图像质量的改善:与呼吸门控常规DWI的比较

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-26 DOI:10.1007/s11604-025-01790-w
Kazuki Oyama, Fumihito Ichinohe, Yasuo Adachi, Yoshihiro Kito, Katsuya Maruyama, Minoru Mitsuda, Thomas Benkert, Omar Darwish, Yasunari Fujinaga
{"title":"深度学习重建胰腺弥散加权成像(DWI)图像质量的改善:与呼吸门控常规DWI的比较","authors":"Kazuki Oyama, Fumihito Ichinohe, Yasuo Adachi, Yoshihiro Kito, Katsuya Maruyama, Minoru Mitsuda, Thomas Benkert, Omar Darwish, Yasunari Fujinaga","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01790-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving pancreatic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) quality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 117 patients (mean age of 68.0 ± 12.9 years) suspected of pancreatic diseases underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between July and December 2023. MRI sequences included respiratory-gated conventional diffusion-weighted images (RGC-DWIs), respiratory-gated diffusion-weighted images with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) (RGDLR-DWIs), and breath-hold diffusion-weighted images with DLR (BHDLR-DWIs) (short TE and long TE equal to other DWIs) at a 3 T MR system. Among these patients, 27 had solid lesions. Two radiologists qualitatively assessed pancreatic shape, main pancreatic duct (MPD) visualization, and solid lesion conspicuity using a 5-point scale. Quantitative analysis included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for pancreatic parenchyma and solid lesions, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), pancreas-to-muscle signal-intensity ratio (PM-SIR) and lesion-to-pancreas signal-intensity ratio (LP-SIR). Differences among DWI sequences were analyzed using Friedman's and Bonferroni's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitatively, BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) had the highest scores for pancreatic shape and MPD but lowest for solid lesions visibility, whereas RGDLR-DWIs had the highest score for solid lesions. Quantitatively, BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) had the lowest ADC values for pancreatic parenchyma and solid lesions, with the highest PM-SIR. There was no significant difference between BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) and RGDLR-DWIs for solid lesion ADC values. RGC-DWIs had the highest SNR, though differences from RGDLR-DWIs and BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) were not significant. Although LP-SIR in RGDLR-DWIs were the lowest, the difference was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) provided the best pancreatic morphology image quality, whereas RGDLR-DWIs were superior for solid lesion detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1509-1519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with deep learning reconstruction of the pancreas: comparison with respiratory-gated conventional DWI.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Oyama, Fumihito Ichinohe, Yasuo Adachi, Yoshihiro Kito, Katsuya Maruyama, Minoru Mitsuda, Thomas Benkert, Omar Darwish, Yasunari Fujinaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-025-01790-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving pancreatic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) quality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 117 patients (mean age of 68.0 ± 12.9 years) suspected of pancreatic diseases underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between July and December 2023. MRI sequences included respiratory-gated conventional diffusion-weighted images (RGC-DWIs), respiratory-gated diffusion-weighted images with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) (RGDLR-DWIs), and breath-hold diffusion-weighted images with DLR (BHDLR-DWIs) (short TE and long TE equal to other DWIs) at a 3 T MR system. Among these patients, 27 had solid lesions. Two radiologists qualitatively assessed pancreatic shape, main pancreatic duct (MPD) visualization, and solid lesion conspicuity using a 5-point scale. Quantitative analysis included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for pancreatic parenchyma and solid lesions, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), pancreas-to-muscle signal-intensity ratio (PM-SIR) and lesion-to-pancreas signal-intensity ratio (LP-SIR). Differences among DWI sequences were analyzed using Friedman's and Bonferroni's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitatively, BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) had the highest scores for pancreatic shape and MPD but lowest for solid lesions visibility, whereas RGDLR-DWIs had the highest score for solid lesions. Quantitatively, BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) had the lowest ADC values for pancreatic parenchyma and solid lesions, with the highest PM-SIR. There was no significant difference between BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) and RGDLR-DWIs for solid lesion ADC values. RGC-DWIs had the highest SNR, though differences from RGDLR-DWIs and BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) were not significant. Although LP-SIR in RGDLR-DWIs were the lowest, the difference was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) provided the best pancreatic morphology image quality, whereas RGDLR-DWIs were superior for solid lesion detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1509-1519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01790-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01790-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价基于深度学习的胰腺重建(DLR)提高胰腺弥散加权成像(DWI)质量的效果。材料与方法:2023年7月至12月,117例疑似胰腺疾病患者(平均年龄68.0±12.9岁)行磁共振成像(MRI)检查。MRI序列包括呼吸门控常规弥散加权图像(rgc - dwi),呼吸门控弥散加权图像与基于深度学习的重建(DLR) (rgdlr - dwi),呼吸屏息弥散加权图像与DLR (bhdlr - dwi)(短TE和长TE等于其他dwi)。其中27例有实性病变。两名放射科医生使用5分制对胰腺形状、主胰管(MPD)可视化和实体病变显著性进行定性评估。定量分析包括胰腺实质和实性病变的表观扩散系数(ADC)值、信噪比(SNR)、胰腺-肌肉信号强度比(PM-SIR)和病变-胰腺信号强度比(LP-SIR)。采用Friedman's和Bonferroni's检验分析DWI序列的差异。结果:定性地说,bhdlr - dwi(简称TE)在胰腺形状和MPD方面得分最高,但在实性病变可见性方面得分最低,而rgdlr - dwi在实性病变方面得分最高。从数量上看,bhdlr - dwi(简称TE)对胰腺实质和实体病变的ADC值最低,PM-SIR值最高。bhdlr - dwi(简称TE)与rgdlr - dwi在实性病变ADC值上无显著差异。rgc - dwi信噪比最高,但与rgdlr - dwi和bhdlr - dwi(短TE)差异不显著。虽然rgdlr - dwi的LP-SIR最低,但差异不显著。结论:bhdlr - dwi(简称TE)胰腺形态学图像质量最好,而rgdlr - dwi对实体病变的检测效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improvement of image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with deep learning reconstruction of the pancreas: comparison with respiratory-gated conventional DWI.

Improvement of image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with deep learning reconstruction of the pancreas: comparison with respiratory-gated conventional DWI.

Improvement of image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with deep learning reconstruction of the pancreas: comparison with respiratory-gated conventional DWI.

Improvement of image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with deep learning reconstruction of the pancreas: comparison with respiratory-gated conventional DWI.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving pancreatic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) quality.

Materials and methods: In total, 117 patients (mean age of 68.0 ± 12.9 years) suspected of pancreatic diseases underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between July and December 2023. MRI sequences included respiratory-gated conventional diffusion-weighted images (RGC-DWIs), respiratory-gated diffusion-weighted images with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) (RGDLR-DWIs), and breath-hold diffusion-weighted images with DLR (BHDLR-DWIs) (short TE and long TE equal to other DWIs) at a 3 T MR system. Among these patients, 27 had solid lesions. Two radiologists qualitatively assessed pancreatic shape, main pancreatic duct (MPD) visualization, and solid lesion conspicuity using a 5-point scale. Quantitative analysis included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for pancreatic parenchyma and solid lesions, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), pancreas-to-muscle signal-intensity ratio (PM-SIR) and lesion-to-pancreas signal-intensity ratio (LP-SIR). Differences among DWI sequences were analyzed using Friedman's and Bonferroni's tests.

Results: Qualitatively, BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) had the highest scores for pancreatic shape and MPD but lowest for solid lesions visibility, whereas RGDLR-DWIs had the highest score for solid lesions. Quantitatively, BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) had the lowest ADC values for pancreatic parenchyma and solid lesions, with the highest PM-SIR. There was no significant difference between BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) and RGDLR-DWIs for solid lesion ADC values. RGC-DWIs had the highest SNR, though differences from RGDLR-DWIs and BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) were not significant. Although LP-SIR in RGDLR-DWIs were the lowest, the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: BHDLR-DWIs (short TE) provided the best pancreatic morphology image quality, whereas RGDLR-DWIs were superior for solid lesion detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信