基于国家预警系统(NEWS)的生命体征监测神经网络体系结构比较研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1177/14604582251338176
Adel BenAbdennour
{"title":"基于国家预警系统(NEWS)的生命体征监测神经网络体系结构比较研究。","authors":"Adel BenAbdennour","doi":"10.1177/14604582251338176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The study aims to assess the efficacy of various neural network architectures in predicting the National Early Warning Systems (NEWS) score, using vital signs, to enhance early warning and monitoring in clinical settings. <b>Methods:</b> A comparative evaluation of 29 neural network architectures, including Discriminant Analysis, Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Neural Networks, and Ensemble methods, was performed. These architectures were assessed based on accuracy, sensitivity, processing speed, model size, and execution time, using synthetically generated data representing 9000 clinical scenarios. <b>Results:</b> The analysis revealed that Linear Discriminant Analysis, narrow and medium Neural Networks, and specific Support Vector Machine (SVM) configurations, particularly Linear SVM, Quadratic SVM, and Coarse Gaussian SVM, achieved 100% accuracy and efficiency in predicting NEWS scores, making them suitable for real-time monitoring. Other architectures exhibited varying performance, with many failing to meet the required accuracy for clinical applications. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study identified Linear Discriminant Analysis and narrow and medium Neural Networks, along with Linear, Quadratic, and Coarse Gaussian SVMs, as optimal for integrating machine learning with NEWS, due to their precision, speed, and suitability for deployment in healthcare environments, particularly in Intensive Care Units.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 2","pages":"14604582251338176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of neural network architectures for vital signs monitoring based on the national early warning systems (NEWS).\",\"authors\":\"Adel BenAbdennour\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582251338176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The study aims to assess the efficacy of various neural network architectures in predicting the National Early Warning Systems (NEWS) score, using vital signs, to enhance early warning and monitoring in clinical settings. <b>Methods:</b> A comparative evaluation of 29 neural network architectures, including Discriminant Analysis, Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Neural Networks, and Ensemble methods, was performed. These architectures were assessed based on accuracy, sensitivity, processing speed, model size, and execution time, using synthetically generated data representing 9000 clinical scenarios. <b>Results:</b> The analysis revealed that Linear Discriminant Analysis, narrow and medium Neural Networks, and specific Support Vector Machine (SVM) configurations, particularly Linear SVM, Quadratic SVM, and Coarse Gaussian SVM, achieved 100% accuracy and efficiency in predicting NEWS scores, making them suitable for real-time monitoring. Other architectures exhibited varying performance, with many failing to meet the required accuracy for clinical applications. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study identified Linear Discriminant Analysis and narrow and medium Neural Networks, along with Linear, Quadratic, and Coarse Gaussian SVMs, as optimal for integrating machine learning with NEWS, due to their precision, speed, and suitability for deployment in healthcare environments, particularly in Intensive Care Units.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"14604582251338176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251338176\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251338176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估各种神经网络架构在使用生命体征预测国家预警系统(NEWS)评分方面的有效性,以加强临床环境中的早期预警和监测。方法:对29种神经网络架构进行比较评价,包括判别分析、支持向量机、逻辑回归、决策树、神经网络和集成方法。这些架构根据准确性、灵敏度、处理速度、模型大小和执行时间进行评估,使用代表9000个临床场景的综合生成数据。结果:分析表明,线性判别分析、狭义和中等神经网络以及特定的支持向量机(SVM)配置,特别是线性支持向量机(Linear SVM)、二次支持向量机(Quadratic SVM)和粗高斯支持向量机(Coarse Gaussian SVM)预测新闻评分的准确率和效率达到100%,适合实时监测。其他架构表现出不同的性能,许多未能满足临床应用所需的准确性。结论:该研究确定了线性判别分析和狭窄和中等神经网络,以及线性、二次和粗高斯支持向量机,由于其精度、速度和在医疗保健环境中部署的适用性,特别是在重症监护病房中,是将机器学习与NEWS集成的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of neural network architectures for vital signs monitoring based on the national early warning systems (NEWS).

Objective: The study aims to assess the efficacy of various neural network architectures in predicting the National Early Warning Systems (NEWS) score, using vital signs, to enhance early warning and monitoring in clinical settings. Methods: A comparative evaluation of 29 neural network architectures, including Discriminant Analysis, Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Neural Networks, and Ensemble methods, was performed. These architectures were assessed based on accuracy, sensitivity, processing speed, model size, and execution time, using synthetically generated data representing 9000 clinical scenarios. Results: The analysis revealed that Linear Discriminant Analysis, narrow and medium Neural Networks, and specific Support Vector Machine (SVM) configurations, particularly Linear SVM, Quadratic SVM, and Coarse Gaussian SVM, achieved 100% accuracy and efficiency in predicting NEWS scores, making them suitable for real-time monitoring. Other architectures exhibited varying performance, with many failing to meet the required accuracy for clinical applications. Conclusion: The study identified Linear Discriminant Analysis and narrow and medium Neural Networks, along with Linear, Quadratic, and Coarse Gaussian SVMs, as optimal for integrating machine learning with NEWS, due to their precision, speed, and suitability for deployment in healthcare environments, particularly in Intensive Care Units.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信