C1-C2固定:对颈椎活动度和生活质量的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicola Pagani, Francesco Tengattini, Costanza Maria Zattra, Giorgio Saraceno, Luca Zanin, Firas Mourad, Andrea Giudice, Leonardo Pellicciari, Claudio Cornali, Pier Paolo Panciani, Marco Maria Fontanella, Francesco Belotti
{"title":"C1-C2固定:对颈椎活动度和生活质量的影响。","authors":"Nicola Pagani, Francesco Tengattini, Costanza Maria Zattra, Giorgio Saraceno, Luca Zanin, Firas Mourad, Andrea Giudice, Leonardo Pellicciari, Claudio Cornali, Pier Paolo Panciani, Marco Maria Fontanella, Francesco Belotti","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>C1-C2 fusion is a well-established procedure for treating instability at the upper cervical spine. However, its precise impact on cervical range of motion (ROM) and the degree to which thoracolumbar or global compensations can restore functional mobility remain incompletely understood. Moreover, patient-reported outcomes after such surgery are not fully characterized. This study addresses four questions: (1) How does C1-C2 fusion affect cervical ROM compared to healthy controls? (2) Can thoracolumbar and global compensations restore normal mobility? (3) What is the impact on quality of life measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36)? (4) Are these compensations sufficient for activities of daily living?</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized that while C1-C2 fusion would significantly reduce cervical ROM, compensatory mechanisms would enable patients to preserve sufficient motion for daily activities, albeit with a potential decrease in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 19 patients (11 males, 8 females) who underwent Goel-Harms C1-C2 fusion between 2010 and 2021, with a minimum six-month postoperative follow-up. Cervical ROM (flexion-extension, lateral bending, rotation) was measured using the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device in three scenarios: no compensation, thoracolumbar compensation, and global compensation. We performed a comparison with the normal values reported in literature. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the NDI and SF-36 questionnaires. Statistical analyses included t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and correlation tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Cervical ROM was significantly reduced in operated patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). (2) Thoracolumbar and global compensations partially restored mobility, with extension remaining notably limited. (3) Patients reported moderate disability on the NDI and lower SF-36 subscale scores (particularly in physical functioning and pain domains). (4) Despite reduced cervical motion, most activities of daily living were achievable through compensatory mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>C1-C2 fusion substantially restricts upper cervical mobility, yet thoracolumbar and global compensations help maintain functional ROM for daily tasks. Nevertheless, the observed reduction in quality of life highlights the importance of thorough preoperative counseling. These findings align with existing literature on balancing spinal stability with motion preservation. Larger prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and optimize postoperative rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; retrospective observational study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C1-C2 fixation: Effects on cervical range of motion and quality of life.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Pagani, Francesco Tengattini, Costanza Maria Zattra, Giorgio Saraceno, Luca Zanin, Firas Mourad, Andrea Giudice, Leonardo Pellicciari, Claudio Cornali, Pier Paolo Panciani, Marco Maria Fontanella, Francesco Belotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>C1-C2 fusion is a well-established procedure for treating instability at the upper cervical spine. However, its precise impact on cervical range of motion (ROM) and the degree to which thoracolumbar or global compensations can restore functional mobility remain incompletely understood. Moreover, patient-reported outcomes after such surgery are not fully characterized. This study addresses four questions: (1) How does C1-C2 fusion affect cervical ROM compared to healthy controls? (2) Can thoracolumbar and global compensations restore normal mobility? (3) What is the impact on quality of life measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36)? (4) Are these compensations sufficient for activities of daily living?</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized that while C1-C2 fusion would significantly reduce cervical ROM, compensatory mechanisms would enable patients to preserve sufficient motion for daily activities, albeit with a potential decrease in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 19 patients (11 males, 8 females) who underwent Goel-Harms C1-C2 fusion between 2010 and 2021, with a minimum six-month postoperative follow-up. Cervical ROM (flexion-extension, lateral bending, rotation) was measured using the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device in three scenarios: no compensation, thoracolumbar compensation, and global compensation. We performed a comparison with the normal values reported in literature. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the NDI and SF-36 questionnaires. Statistical analyses included t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and correlation tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Cervical ROM was significantly reduced in operated patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). (2) Thoracolumbar and global compensations partially restored mobility, with extension remaining notably limited. (3) Patients reported moderate disability on the NDI and lower SF-36 subscale scores (particularly in physical functioning and pain domains). (4) Despite reduced cervical motion, most activities of daily living were achievable through compensatory mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>C1-C2 fusion substantially restricts upper cervical mobility, yet thoracolumbar and global compensations help maintain functional ROM for daily tasks. Nevertheless, the observed reduction in quality of life highlights the importance of thorough preoperative counseling. These findings align with existing literature on balancing spinal stability with motion preservation. Larger prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and optimize postoperative rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; retrospective observational study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:C1-C2融合术是治疗上颈椎不稳的一种成熟手术。然而,其对颈椎活动度(ROM)的确切影响以及胸腰椎或全身代偿恢复功能活动的程度仍不完全清楚。此外,此类手术后患者报告的结果并没有完全表征。本研究解决了四个问题:(1)与健康对照相比,C1-C2融合如何影响颈椎ROM ?(2)胸腰椎和全身代偿能恢复正常的活动能力吗?(3)颈部残疾指数(NDI)和简短健康调查36 (SF-36)对生活质量的影响是什么?(4)这些补偿足够支付日常生活活动吗?假设:我们假设C1-C2融合会显著减少颈椎ROM,代偿机制会使患者保持足够的日常活动,尽管可能会降低生活质量。患者和方法:这项回顾性观察性研究包括19例患者(11名男性,8名女性),他们在2010年至2021年间接受了Goel-Harms C1-C2融合,术后随访至少6个月。使用颈椎活动度(CROM)装置在三种情况下测量颈椎ROM(屈伸、侧屈、旋转):无代偿、胸腰椎代偿和全身代偿。我们与文献报道的正常值进行了比较。使用NDI和SF-36问卷评估患者报告的结果。统计分析包括t检验、重复测量方差分析和相关检验。结果:(1)与对照组相比,手术患者的颈椎活动度显著降低(p讨论:C1-C2融合极大地限制了上颈椎的活动,但胸腰椎和全身代偿有助于维持日常任务的功能性活动度。然而,观察到的生活质量下降突出了术前全面咨询的重要性。这些发现与现有的关于平衡脊柱稳定性和运动保持的文献一致。需要更大的前瞻性研究来完善患者选择和优化术后康复。证据等级:四级;回顾性观察性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
C1-C2 fixation: Effects on cervical range of motion and quality of life.

Background: C1-C2 fusion is a well-established procedure for treating instability at the upper cervical spine. However, its precise impact on cervical range of motion (ROM) and the degree to which thoracolumbar or global compensations can restore functional mobility remain incompletely understood. Moreover, patient-reported outcomes after such surgery are not fully characterized. This study addresses four questions: (1) How does C1-C2 fusion affect cervical ROM compared to healthy controls? (2) Can thoracolumbar and global compensations restore normal mobility? (3) What is the impact on quality of life measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36)? (4) Are these compensations sufficient for activities of daily living?

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that while C1-C2 fusion would significantly reduce cervical ROM, compensatory mechanisms would enable patients to preserve sufficient motion for daily activities, albeit with a potential decrease in quality of life.

Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study included 19 patients (11 males, 8 females) who underwent Goel-Harms C1-C2 fusion between 2010 and 2021, with a minimum six-month postoperative follow-up. Cervical ROM (flexion-extension, lateral bending, rotation) was measured using the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device in three scenarios: no compensation, thoracolumbar compensation, and global compensation. We performed a comparison with the normal values reported in literature. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the NDI and SF-36 questionnaires. Statistical analyses included t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and correlation tests.

Results: (1) Cervical ROM was significantly reduced in operated patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). (2) Thoracolumbar and global compensations partially restored mobility, with extension remaining notably limited. (3) Patients reported moderate disability on the NDI and lower SF-36 subscale scores (particularly in physical functioning and pain domains). (4) Despite reduced cervical motion, most activities of daily living were achievable through compensatory mechanisms.

Discussion: C1-C2 fusion substantially restricts upper cervical mobility, yet thoracolumbar and global compensations help maintain functional ROM for daily tasks. Nevertheless, the observed reduction in quality of life highlights the importance of thorough preoperative counseling. These findings align with existing literature on balancing spinal stability with motion preservation. Larger prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and optimize postoperative rehabilitation.

Level of evidence: IV; retrospective observational study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信