{"title":"多个腹膜开窗对肾移植术后淋巴并发症的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Lalit Sharma, Manoj Kumar Dokania, Revanth Kumar Reddy Pothapi, Gyan Ranjan Kumar, Madhuri Gautam, Nikhil Gupta, Nitin Agarwal","doi":"10.6002/ect.2025.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lymphatic complications are a common (up to 30%) surgical complication after renal transplant. Both lymphocele and lymphorrhea have been extensively studied, but solutions are still sought. We designed a prospective randomized study to determine the effect of multiple intraoperatively performed peritoneal fenestrations on lymphatic complications after renal transplant.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Over an 18-month period, we randomized eligible recipients for living donor renal transplant into 2 groups: group 1 had small preventive peritoneal fenestrations (10 of 2 cm each) after graft implant, andgroup2hadnofenestrations. We examined lymphatic complications (primary outcome), age, male versus female distribution, hemodialysis duration, body mass index, operation time, acute rejection, delayed graft function, warm ischemia time, and hospital stay. We compared results with t tests or χ2 test/the Fisher exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 groups (10 in group 1 and 14 in group 2) were comparable with respect to demographic and clinical parameters, including operation time, warm ischemia time, and cold ischemia time; however, duration of preoperative dialysis was significantly less in group 1 (12.3 ± 2.8 vs 21.0 ± 4.6 mo; P < .001). Lymphocele, lymphorrhea and overall lymphatic complications were not significantly different between the groups, except for postoperative drain output, which was lower in group 1 than in group 2. No intestinal obstruction, ascitic leak, or bowel injury was reported in group 1 or group 2. On univariate analysis, none of the studied factors significantly affected lymphatic complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preventive peritoneal fenestrations are a safe, feasible, and effective way of minimizing lymphatic complications; however, more studies with larger sample sizes are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":50467,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","volume":"23 3","pages":"174-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Multiple Peritoneal Fenestrations on Lymphatic Complications After Renal Transplant: A Prospective Randomized Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lalit Sharma, Manoj Kumar Dokania, Revanth Kumar Reddy Pothapi, Gyan Ranjan Kumar, Madhuri Gautam, Nikhil Gupta, Nitin Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.6002/ect.2025.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lymphatic complications are a common (up to 30%) surgical complication after renal transplant. Both lymphocele and lymphorrhea have been extensively studied, but solutions are still sought. We designed a prospective randomized study to determine the effect of multiple intraoperatively performed peritoneal fenestrations on lymphatic complications after renal transplant.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Over an 18-month period, we randomized eligible recipients for living donor renal transplant into 2 groups: group 1 had small preventive peritoneal fenestrations (10 of 2 cm each) after graft implant, andgroup2hadnofenestrations. We examined lymphatic complications (primary outcome), age, male versus female distribution, hemodialysis duration, body mass index, operation time, acute rejection, delayed graft function, warm ischemia time, and hospital stay. We compared results with t tests or χ2 test/the Fisher exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 groups (10 in group 1 and 14 in group 2) were comparable with respect to demographic and clinical parameters, including operation time, warm ischemia time, and cold ischemia time; however, duration of preoperative dialysis was significantly less in group 1 (12.3 ± 2.8 vs 21.0 ± 4.6 mo; P < .001). Lymphocele, lymphorrhea and overall lymphatic complications were not significantly different between the groups, except for postoperative drain output, which was lower in group 1 than in group 2. No intestinal obstruction, ascitic leak, or bowel injury was reported in group 1 or group 2. On univariate analysis, none of the studied factors significantly affected lymphatic complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preventive peritoneal fenestrations are a safe, feasible, and effective way of minimizing lymphatic complications; however, more studies with larger sample sizes are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"174-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2025.0007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2025.0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:淋巴并发症是肾移植术后常见的手术并发症(高达30%)。淋巴囊肿和淋巴漏都已被广泛研究,但仍在寻求解决方案。我们设计了一项前瞻性随机研究,以确定术中多次腹膜开窗对肾移植术后淋巴并发症的影响。材料和方法:在18个月的时间里,我们将符合条件的活体肾移植受者随机分为两组:第一组在移植后有小的预防性腹膜开窗(10个,每个2厘米),第二组没有开窗。我们检查了淋巴并发症(主要结局)、年龄、男女分布、血液透析持续时间、体重指数、手术时间、急性排斥反应、移植物功能延迟、热缺血时间和住院时间。我们将结果与t检验或χ2检验/ Fisher精确检验进行比较。结果:两组(1组10例,2组14例)在手术时间、热缺血时间、冷缺血时间等人口学及临床参数方面具有可比性;然而,1组患者术前透析时间明显缩短(12.3±2.8 vs 21.0±4.6);P < 0.001)。除术后排液量1组低于2组外,淋巴囊肿、淋巴漏及整体淋巴并发症组间无显著差异。1组和2组均无肠梗阻、腹水漏或肠损伤报告。在单因素分析中,没有研究因素显著影响淋巴并发症。结论:预防性腹膜开孔是一种安全、可行、有效的减少淋巴并发症的方法;然而,需要更多样本量更大的研究。
Effect of Multiple Peritoneal Fenestrations on Lymphatic Complications After Renal Transplant: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Objectives: Lymphatic complications are a common (up to 30%) surgical complication after renal transplant. Both lymphocele and lymphorrhea have been extensively studied, but solutions are still sought. We designed a prospective randomized study to determine the effect of multiple intraoperatively performed peritoneal fenestrations on lymphatic complications after renal transplant.
Materials and methods: Over an 18-month period, we randomized eligible recipients for living donor renal transplant into 2 groups: group 1 had small preventive peritoneal fenestrations (10 of 2 cm each) after graft implant, andgroup2hadnofenestrations. We examined lymphatic complications (primary outcome), age, male versus female distribution, hemodialysis duration, body mass index, operation time, acute rejection, delayed graft function, warm ischemia time, and hospital stay. We compared results with t tests or χ2 test/the Fisher exact test.
Results: The 2 groups (10 in group 1 and 14 in group 2) were comparable with respect to demographic and clinical parameters, including operation time, warm ischemia time, and cold ischemia time; however, duration of preoperative dialysis was significantly less in group 1 (12.3 ± 2.8 vs 21.0 ± 4.6 mo; P < .001). Lymphocele, lymphorrhea and overall lymphatic complications were not significantly different between the groups, except for postoperative drain output, which was lower in group 1 than in group 2. No intestinal obstruction, ascitic leak, or bowel injury was reported in group 1 or group 2. On univariate analysis, none of the studied factors significantly affected lymphatic complications.
Conclusions: Preventive peritoneal fenestrations are a safe, feasible, and effective way of minimizing lymphatic complications; however, more studies with larger sample sizes are required.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the journal includes the following:
Surgical techniques, innovations, and novelties;
Immunobiology and immunosuppression;
Clinical results;
Complications;
Infection;
Malignancies;
Organ donation;
Organ and tissue procurement and preservation;
Sociological and ethical issues;
Xenotransplantation.