Márlon Juliano Romero Aliberti, Thiago Junqueira Avelino-Silva, Kenneth E Covinsky, Laiss Bertola, Regina Miksian Magaldi, Cynthia M Boyd, Christopher R Carpenter, Mônica Sanches Yasuda, Claudia Kimie Suemoto
{"title":"拉开医院痴呆检测的帷幕:基于信息提供者的临床痴呆评级的验证。","authors":"Márlon Juliano Romero Aliberti, Thiago Junqueira Avelino-Silva, Kenneth E Covinsky, Laiss Bertola, Regina Miksian Magaldi, Cynthia M Boyd, Christopher R Carpenter, Mônica Sanches Yasuda, Claudia Kimie Suemoto","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia often goes undetected in hospital settings, where cognitive assessments are challenging due to illness severity and delirium. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the accuracy of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), based solely on knowledgeable informant reports, for detecting preexisting dementia and cognitive impairment in hospitalized patients compared to a gold-standard diagnosis, (2) and compare its performance to the 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-16).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 admitted to inpatient units from five hospitals in Brazil. The informant-based CDR was administered to knowledgeable informants within 48 h of admission, capturing patients' cognitive status 3 months before hospitalization to avoid the influence of acute cognitive impairments. Blinded experts provided a gold standard clinical diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) based on a 90-min comprehensive assessment, including a standardized neuropsychology battery. Areas under the curve (AUC) examined diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 65 participants (mean age = 79.4 years; women = 54%), 34% had dementia and 32% had CIND. Compared to the gold standard, the informant-based CDR showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for detecting dementia (AUC = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-0.98) and cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.88-0.98), with a cutoff of ≥ 1 showing 98% specificity for dementia and a cutoff of ≥ 0.5 showing 98% sensitivity for cognitive impairment. Compared to the IQCODE-16, the informant-based CDR had similar performance in detecting dementia and a nonsignificant slight advantage in identifying cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.93 vs. 0.84, p = 0.069), reducing unrecognized cognitive impairment based on medical record documentation from 70% to 2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Informant-based CDR is a valid and efficient tool for detecting dementia and cognitive impairment in hospitalized older adults, supporting early diagnosis and guiding multidisciplinary interventions in acute care. Its use in routine hospitals may help clinicians reduce undetected cognitive impairment, enhance decision making, and improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulling Back the Curtain on Hospital Dementia Detection: Validation of the Informant-Based Clinical Dementia Rating.\",\"authors\":\"Márlon Juliano Romero Aliberti, Thiago Junqueira Avelino-Silva, Kenneth E Covinsky, Laiss Bertola, Regina Miksian Magaldi, Cynthia M Boyd, Christopher R Carpenter, Mônica Sanches Yasuda, Claudia Kimie Suemoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia often goes undetected in hospital settings, where cognitive assessments are challenging due to illness severity and delirium. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the accuracy of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), based solely on knowledgeable informant reports, for detecting preexisting dementia and cognitive impairment in hospitalized patients compared to a gold-standard diagnosis, (2) and compare its performance to the 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-16).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 admitted to inpatient units from five hospitals in Brazil. The informant-based CDR was administered to knowledgeable informants within 48 h of admission, capturing patients' cognitive status 3 months before hospitalization to avoid the influence of acute cognitive impairments. Blinded experts provided a gold standard clinical diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) based on a 90-min comprehensive assessment, including a standardized neuropsychology battery. Areas under the curve (AUC) examined diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 65 participants (mean age = 79.4 years; women = 54%), 34% had dementia and 32% had CIND. Compared to the gold standard, the informant-based CDR showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for detecting dementia (AUC = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-0.98) and cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.88-0.98), with a cutoff of ≥ 1 showing 98% specificity for dementia and a cutoff of ≥ 0.5 showing 98% sensitivity for cognitive impairment. Compared to the IQCODE-16, the informant-based CDR had similar performance in detecting dementia and a nonsignificant slight advantage in identifying cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.93 vs. 0.84, p = 0.069), reducing unrecognized cognitive impairment based on medical record documentation from 70% to 2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Informant-based CDR is a valid and efficient tool for detecting dementia and cognitive impairment in hospitalized older adults, supporting early diagnosis and guiding multidisciplinary interventions in acute care. Its use in routine hospitals may help clinicians reduce undetected cognitive impairment, enhance decision making, and improve patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在医院环境中,痴呆症往往未被发现,由于疾病严重程度和谵妄,认知评估具有挑战性。本研究旨在(1)评估临床痴呆评分(CDR)的准确性,仅基于知识渊博的告密者报告,与金标准诊断相比,用于检测住院患者先前存在的痴呆和认知障碍,(2)并将其表现与16项老年人认知能力下降的告密者问卷(IQCODE-16)进行比较。方法:这项横断面研究评估了巴西五家医院住院单元的年龄≥65岁的连续患者。在入院后48小时内对有知识的举报人进行基于举报人的CDR,在入院前3个月捕捉患者的认知状态,以避免急性认知障碍的影响。盲法专家根据90分钟的综合评估,包括标准化的神经心理学测试,提供了痴呆或认知障碍无痴呆(CIND)的金标准临床诊断。曲线下面积(AUC)检查诊断的准确性。结果:65名参与者(平均年龄79.4岁;女性= 54%),34%患有痴呆,32%患有CIND。与金标准相比,基于线人的CDR在检测痴呆方面表现出出色的诊断准确性(AUC = 0.92;95%可信区间[CI] = 0.86-0.98)和认知障碍(AUC = 0.93;95% CI = 0.88-0.98),截断值≥1表明对痴呆的特异性为98%,截断值≥0.5表明对认知障碍的敏感性为98%。与IQCODE-16相比,基于信息者的CDR在检测痴呆方面具有相似的表现,在识别认知障碍方面具有不显著的轻微优势(AUC = 0.93 vs. 0.84, p = 0.069),将基于医疗记录文件的未被识别的认知障碍从70%减少到2%。结论:基于信息的CDR是一种有效和高效的工具,可用于发现住院老年人痴呆和认知功能障碍,支持早期诊断并指导急性护理中的多学科干预。在常规医院使用它可以帮助临床医生减少未被发现的认知障碍,提高决策能力,改善病人护理。
Pulling Back the Curtain on Hospital Dementia Detection: Validation of the Informant-Based Clinical Dementia Rating.
Background: Dementia often goes undetected in hospital settings, where cognitive assessments are challenging due to illness severity and delirium. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the accuracy of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), based solely on knowledgeable informant reports, for detecting preexisting dementia and cognitive impairment in hospitalized patients compared to a gold-standard diagnosis, (2) and compare its performance to the 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-16).
Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 admitted to inpatient units from five hospitals in Brazil. The informant-based CDR was administered to knowledgeable informants within 48 h of admission, capturing patients' cognitive status 3 months before hospitalization to avoid the influence of acute cognitive impairments. Blinded experts provided a gold standard clinical diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) based on a 90-min comprehensive assessment, including a standardized neuropsychology battery. Areas under the curve (AUC) examined diagnostic accuracy.
Results: Of 65 participants (mean age = 79.4 years; women = 54%), 34% had dementia and 32% had CIND. Compared to the gold standard, the informant-based CDR showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for detecting dementia (AUC = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-0.98) and cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.88-0.98), with a cutoff of ≥ 1 showing 98% specificity for dementia and a cutoff of ≥ 0.5 showing 98% sensitivity for cognitive impairment. Compared to the IQCODE-16, the informant-based CDR had similar performance in detecting dementia and a nonsignificant slight advantage in identifying cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.93 vs. 0.84, p = 0.069), reducing unrecognized cognitive impairment based on medical record documentation from 70% to 2%.
Conclusions: Informant-based CDR is a valid and efficient tool for detecting dementia and cognitive impairment in hospitalized older adults, supporting early diagnosis and guiding multidisciplinary interventions in acute care. Its use in routine hospitals may help clinicians reduce undetected cognitive impairment, enhance decision making, and improve patient care.