慢性腰痛患者身体活动和锻炼的障碍和促进因素:定性证据综合。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Guilherme Henrique Dalaqua Grande, Rubens Vinícius Caversan Vidal, Maria Carolina Rodrigues Salini, Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro, Crystian Bitencourt Oliveira
{"title":"慢性腰痛患者身体活动和锻炼的障碍和促进因素:定性证据综合。","authors":"Guilherme Henrique Dalaqua Grande, Rubens Vinícius Caversan Vidal, Maria Carolina Rodrigues Salini, Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro, Crystian Bitencourt Oliveira","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate the barriers and facilitators to physical activity and exercise among people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). <b>DESIGN:</b> A qualitative evidence synthesis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. This review was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-uwnqh-v1). <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Qualitative or mixed-methods studies with a qualitative approach were included. Studies must have recruited adults, of both sexes, aged 18 years or older with CLBP. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> We used a thematic analysis approach in our review. First, participant quotes in the \"Results\" section of included studies were analyzed and coded. Second, the codes were used to create our coding framework. Then, the coding framework was applied to included studies. Finally, 2 reviewers independently analyzed the themes constructed in our qualitative evidence synthesis to identify barriers and facilitators for people with CLBP to engage in physical activity. <b>RESULTS:</b> Fifty-seven studies were included. The quality assessment (Critical Appraisal Skills Program) revealed that most studies (77%) had minor concerns. Barriers to physical activity were mainly related to pain intensity, fear of movement, intervention type, lack of information, motivation, and support. Facilitators of physical activity were adequate information, professional and social support, perceived benefits, and favorable conditions to engage in physical activity. Based on the GRADE-CERQual, most themes and subthemes presented moderate quality of evidence. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The barriers to people with chronic LBP engaging in physical activity included pain intensity and fear of reinjury, type of intervention, lack of information, motivation and support, and occupational and socioenvironmental factors. The main facilitators were receiving information and support from health professionals, motivational activities, knowledge about benefits of the intervention, and external factors. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(5):1-19. Epub 7 April 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12905</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 5","pages":"312-330"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity and Exercise Among People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Henrique Dalaqua Grande, Rubens Vinícius Caversan Vidal, Maria Carolina Rodrigues Salini, Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro, Crystian Bitencourt Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2025.12905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate the barriers and facilitators to physical activity and exercise among people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). <b>DESIGN:</b> A qualitative evidence synthesis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. This review was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-uwnqh-v1). <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Qualitative or mixed-methods studies with a qualitative approach were included. Studies must have recruited adults, of both sexes, aged 18 years or older with CLBP. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> We used a thematic analysis approach in our review. First, participant quotes in the \\\"Results\\\" section of included studies were analyzed and coded. Second, the codes were used to create our coding framework. Then, the coding framework was applied to included studies. Finally, 2 reviewers independently analyzed the themes constructed in our qualitative evidence synthesis to identify barriers and facilitators for people with CLBP to engage in physical activity. <b>RESULTS:</b> Fifty-seven studies were included. The quality assessment (Critical Appraisal Skills Program) revealed that most studies (77%) had minor concerns. Barriers to physical activity were mainly related to pain intensity, fear of movement, intervention type, lack of information, motivation, and support. Facilitators of physical activity were adequate information, professional and social support, perceived benefits, and favorable conditions to engage in physical activity. Based on the GRADE-CERQual, most themes and subthemes presented moderate quality of evidence. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The barriers to people with chronic LBP engaging in physical activity included pain intensity and fear of reinjury, type of intervention, lack of information, motivation and support, and occupational and socioenvironmental factors. The main facilitators were receiving information and support from health professionals, motivational activities, knowledge about benefits of the intervention, and external factors. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(5):1-19. Epub 7 April 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12905</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"312-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.12905\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.12905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者身体活动和锻炼的障碍和促进因素。设计:定性证据综合。文献检索:我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus和PsycINFO数据库,检索时间从成立到2023年7月。本综述已在开放科学框架(OSF) (https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-uwnqh-v1)上前瞻性注册。研究选择标准:采用定性方法的定性或混合方法研究。研究必须招募成人,男女,年龄在18岁或以上的CLBP患者。资料综合:我们在综述中采用了专题分析方法。首先,对纳入研究的“结果”部分的参与者引用进行分析和编码。其次,代码用于创建我们的编码框架。然后,将编码框架应用于纳入的研究。最后,两位评论者独立分析了我们在定性证据合成中构建的主题,以确定CLBP患者参与体育活动的障碍和促进因素。结果:纳入了57项研究。质量评估(关键评估技能计划)显示,大多数研究(77%)存在次要问题。身体活动障碍主要与疼痛强度、运动恐惧、干预类型、缺乏信息、动机和支持有关。体育活动的促进因素包括充足的信息、专业和社会支持、感知到的好处以及参与体育活动的有利条件。基于GRADE-CERQual,大多数主题和副主题呈现中等质量的证据。结论:慢性腰痛患者从事体力活动的障碍包括疼痛强度和对再损伤的恐惧、干预类型、缺乏信息、动机和支持以及职业和社会环境因素。主要的促进因素是获得卫生专业人员的信息和支持、动机活动、有关干预益处的知识以及外部因素。[J] .体育学报,2015;55(5):1-19。2025年4月7日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.12905。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity and Exercise Among People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the barriers and facilitators to physical activity and exercise among people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). DESIGN: A qualitative evidence synthesis. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. This review was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-uwnqh-v1). STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Qualitative or mixed-methods studies with a qualitative approach were included. Studies must have recruited adults, of both sexes, aged 18 years or older with CLBP. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used a thematic analysis approach in our review. First, participant quotes in the "Results" section of included studies were analyzed and coded. Second, the codes were used to create our coding framework. Then, the coding framework was applied to included studies. Finally, 2 reviewers independently analyzed the themes constructed in our qualitative evidence synthesis to identify barriers and facilitators for people with CLBP to engage in physical activity. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies were included. The quality assessment (Critical Appraisal Skills Program) revealed that most studies (77%) had minor concerns. Barriers to physical activity were mainly related to pain intensity, fear of movement, intervention type, lack of information, motivation, and support. Facilitators of physical activity were adequate information, professional and social support, perceived benefits, and favorable conditions to engage in physical activity. Based on the GRADE-CERQual, most themes and subthemes presented moderate quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: The barriers to people with chronic LBP engaging in physical activity included pain intensity and fear of reinjury, type of intervention, lack of information, motivation and support, and occupational and socioenvironmental factors. The main facilitators were receiving information and support from health professionals, motivational activities, knowledge about benefits of the intervention, and external factors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(5):1-19. Epub 7 April 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12905.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信