{"title":"实施生物银行的数字成熟度框架。","authors":"Federica Rossi , Davide Fragnito , Antonella Cruoglio , Ramona Palombo , Alice Massacci , Alessandro Sulis , Vittorio Meloni , Sara Casati , Antonella Mirabile , Andrea Manconi , Luciano Milanesi , Gennaro Ciliberto , Monica Forni , Valentina Adami , Massimiliano Borsani , Claudia Miele , Marialuisa Lavitrano , Matteo Pallocca","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Digitalization is a pillar of reproducible research and a mandatory requirement for Research Infrastructures. Biobanks must ensure a fully engineered and digitalized process towards data FAIRification. To this aim, the first step is to assess the current level of digitalization using quantitative metrics, which is particularly challenging given the multi-faceted regulatory and logistical nature of biobanking.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed a Biobanking digital assessment maturity framework, BB4FAIR, comprising a survey divided into three macro areas, namely IT infrastructure, personnel, and data annotation richness. Furthermore, we implemented an automated R/Shiny system to analyse survey responses and generate visual data representations. We piloted the tool on 46 Italian biobanks that in 2023 had signed the partner charter with BBMRI. A scoring table facilitated the tiering of digital maturity, highlighting areas requiring corrective action.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The assessment revealed significant heterogeneity across the three macro-areas of digitalization: almost half of the biobanks feature adequate IT infrastructure and personnel, and a smaller proportion have robust data annotation capabilities. Notably, most biobanks reported having a Biobank IT Management System (BIMS) or an alternative that serves their purposes, yet they still collect the consent to biobanking for future purposes in paper format; the digitalization of informed consent is generally lacking. These findings highlight the need for targeted improvements in Biobank digitalization to enhance overall data FAIRness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The survey results underscore a pressing need for enhanced IT training and improved data annotation resources within the BBMRI.it. Corrective actions on many lacking features and desiderata are ongoing in the context of the #NextGenerationEu “Strengthening BBMRI.it” project.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104842"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a Digital Maturity Framework for Biobanking\",\"authors\":\"Federica Rossi , Davide Fragnito , Antonella Cruoglio , Ramona Palombo , Alice Massacci , Alessandro Sulis , Vittorio Meloni , Sara Casati , Antonella Mirabile , Andrea Manconi , Luciano Milanesi , Gennaro Ciliberto , Monica Forni , Valentina Adami , Massimiliano Borsani , Claudia Miele , Marialuisa Lavitrano , Matteo Pallocca\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Digitalization is a pillar of reproducible research and a mandatory requirement for Research Infrastructures. Biobanks must ensure a fully engineered and digitalized process towards data FAIRification. To this aim, the first step is to assess the current level of digitalization using quantitative metrics, which is particularly challenging given the multi-faceted regulatory and logistical nature of biobanking.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed a Biobanking digital assessment maturity framework, BB4FAIR, comprising a survey divided into three macro areas, namely IT infrastructure, personnel, and data annotation richness. Furthermore, we implemented an automated R/Shiny system to analyse survey responses and generate visual data representations. We piloted the tool on 46 Italian biobanks that in 2023 had signed the partner charter with BBMRI. A scoring table facilitated the tiering of digital maturity, highlighting areas requiring corrective action.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The assessment revealed significant heterogeneity across the three macro-areas of digitalization: almost half of the biobanks feature adequate IT infrastructure and personnel, and a smaller proportion have robust data annotation capabilities. Notably, most biobanks reported having a Biobank IT Management System (BIMS) or an alternative that serves their purposes, yet they still collect the consent to biobanking for future purposes in paper format; the digitalization of informed consent is generally lacking. These findings highlight the need for targeted improvements in Biobank digitalization to enhance overall data FAIRness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The survey results underscore a pressing need for enhanced IT training and improved data annotation resources within the BBMRI.it. Corrective actions on many lacking features and desiderata are ongoing in the context of the #NextGenerationEu “Strengthening BBMRI.it” project.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000711\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000711","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of a Digital Maturity Framework for Biobanking
Objective
Digitalization is a pillar of reproducible research and a mandatory requirement for Research Infrastructures. Biobanks must ensure a fully engineered and digitalized process towards data FAIRification. To this aim, the first step is to assess the current level of digitalization using quantitative metrics, which is particularly challenging given the multi-faceted regulatory and logistical nature of biobanking.
Methods
We developed a Biobanking digital assessment maturity framework, BB4FAIR, comprising a survey divided into three macro areas, namely IT infrastructure, personnel, and data annotation richness. Furthermore, we implemented an automated R/Shiny system to analyse survey responses and generate visual data representations. We piloted the tool on 46 Italian biobanks that in 2023 had signed the partner charter with BBMRI. A scoring table facilitated the tiering of digital maturity, highlighting areas requiring corrective action.
Results
The assessment revealed significant heterogeneity across the three macro-areas of digitalization: almost half of the biobanks feature adequate IT infrastructure and personnel, and a smaller proportion have robust data annotation capabilities. Notably, most biobanks reported having a Biobank IT Management System (BIMS) or an alternative that serves their purposes, yet they still collect the consent to biobanking for future purposes in paper format; the digitalization of informed consent is generally lacking. These findings highlight the need for targeted improvements in Biobank digitalization to enhance overall data FAIRness.
Conclusion
The survey results underscore a pressing need for enhanced IT training and improved data annotation resources within the BBMRI.it. Corrective actions on many lacking features and desiderata are ongoing in the context of the #NextGenerationEu “Strengthening BBMRI.it” project.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.