血管征象分析为优化CBCT在介入肺科的应用铺平了道路:组合式算法一站式服务。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/jca.109996
Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt, Ying Xu, Julia Greeven, Sander Langereis, Haidong Huang, Jian Liu, Xiaopeng Yao, Xiaping Shen, Yang Yang, Liangquan Wu, Paul Zarogoulidis, Stamatis Petousis, Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou, Dimitris Petridis, Michael Steinheimer, Andreas Riedel, Noufal Aboobaker, Evaggelos Karamitrousis, Eleni-Isidora Perdikouri, Anastasios Vagionas, Thomas Vogl, Anil Sinha
{"title":"血管征象分析为优化CBCT在介入肺科的应用铺平了道路:组合式算法一站式服务。","authors":"Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt, Ying Xu, Julia Greeven, Sander Langereis, Haidong Huang, Jian Liu, Xiaopeng Yao, Xiaping Shen, Yang Yang, Liangquan Wu, Paul Zarogoulidis, Stamatis Petousis, Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou, Dimitris Petridis, Michael Steinheimer, Andreas Riedel, Noufal Aboobaker, Evaggelos Karamitrousis, Eleni-Isidora Perdikouri, Anastasios Vagionas, Thomas Vogl, Anil Sinha","doi":"10.7150/jca.109996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> We used CBCT application as one-stop-shop nodule orientated approach in regards to increase DY, reduce complication rate, reduce time on-table and economical costs with classical peripheral instruments including mini-cryoprobe (ERBE 1,1mm), rEBUS (Olympus) and standard RUFBs (Olympus Company) with at least 2mm working channel and 4,2mm outer diameter for the diagnosis of peripheral targets (iSPNs) in a prospective all-comers registry after detailed analysis of pre-interventional CT for vessel- and bronchus sign classes. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> From Jun 2017 until Nov 2019 in 90 all-comers patients between 16 and 95 years fit for bronchoscopy with 101 peripheral lesions in a daily routine scheme after informed consent about this prospective registry were included. For histological proven benign disease in any lesion patients had to adhere FU according radiological guidelines and further on by re-visits for at least 2 years after biopsy resulting into last visit in Feb 2022 without any drop-out. Present HRCT was mandatory to achieve one day before intervention. It had to be decided by the examiner mainly after analysis of the preset HRCT which of the 3 CBCT driven modalities were used for diagnostical approach: A) Pure endobronchial approach (CBCT, rEBUS, TBB), B) Pure transthoracical approach with a 21G core-biopsy needle (BIOPINCE needle) with CBCT only, or C) Combined approach as described below (CBCT, rEBUS, TTNA). As instruments were available common forceps and needles, EWC, curette and various RUFB (Olympus Company) mentioned in the materials section. A second CBCT was only allowed in the combined approach group to plan the 3D transthoracic approach in expiration whereas even a CBCT for tool-in-lesion control (TIL CBCT) was never allowed in all 3 groups. <b>Results:</b> In 100 lesions predefined modalities pure endobiopsy, pure TTNA and combined approaches were performed in 77, 9 and 14 lesions respectively without any pneumothorax or bleeding. In these 3 modalities we found confirmed (mostly specific) benign and malignant cases 47 and 30, 4 and 5, 2 and 12 respectively. Lesion sizes in the 3 different groups were (median, mean) 14 and 17,7mm (of those 41 invisible of 77 under XR (53%) in the pure endobiopsy group), 27 and 31mm (11% invisible under XR in the pure TTNA group), 18,5 and 23mm (35% invisible under XR in the combined group) respectively. In the 3 groups for the malignant cases 25 of 30, 5 of 5 and 12 of 12 were diagnosed correctly rendering a diagnostical yield of 42 in 47 malignant cases for the whole algorithm (89,4%) with sizes (mean, median) for the whole algorithm of 16 and 19,7mm respectively which is comparable to published data for robotic-assisted bronchoscopy yield. In regards to vessel sign analysis it has to be clearly stated that the significance level for outcome prediction is inferior to bronchus sign analysis. In multivariate analysis there was a clear tendency towards higher outcome prediction especially if a pulmonary artery branch leads into such target even when a bronchus sign is missing. For NY when comparing univariate analysis and partition model analysis at a set diameter of >11mm with significance (p=0,0052) the additional advantage of analysing a given vessel sign (especially pulmonary artery branches) seems to add on 19% of valuable outcome prediction. <b>Conclusion:</b> A nodule orientated approach in a manual CBCT-AF environment including typical instruments renders in experienced hands comparable results to robotic assisted bronchoscopy even without UTN bronchoscopes or other specialized, therefore expensive tools. In multivariate analysis only bronchus sign analysis revealed significant (p = 0,05) prediction of navigational yield outcome prediction whereas vessel sign analysis increases highly the odds ratio in favor of positive outcome prediction but without significance at the given level. In a partition model to erase outliers at a set iSPN diameter >11mm vessel sign analysis (especially pulmonary artery branches) renders a significant and ameliorated prediction of NY.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"16 7","pages":"2124-2144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vessel sign analysis paves the way to optimized CBCT application in interventional pulmonology: COMBINED algorithm as a one-stop-shop.\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt, Ying Xu, Julia Greeven, Sander Langereis, Haidong Huang, Jian Liu, Xiaopeng Yao, Xiaping Shen, Yang Yang, Liangquan Wu, Paul Zarogoulidis, Stamatis Petousis, Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou, Dimitris Petridis, Michael Steinheimer, Andreas Riedel, Noufal Aboobaker, Evaggelos Karamitrousis, Eleni-Isidora Perdikouri, Anastasios Vagionas, Thomas Vogl, Anil Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.7150/jca.109996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> We used CBCT application as one-stop-shop nodule orientated approach in regards to increase DY, reduce complication rate, reduce time on-table and economical costs with classical peripheral instruments including mini-cryoprobe (ERBE 1,1mm), rEBUS (Olympus) and standard RUFBs (Olympus Company) with at least 2mm working channel and 4,2mm outer diameter for the diagnosis of peripheral targets (iSPNs) in a prospective all-comers registry after detailed analysis of pre-interventional CT for vessel- and bronchus sign classes. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> From Jun 2017 until Nov 2019 in 90 all-comers patients between 16 and 95 years fit for bronchoscopy with 101 peripheral lesions in a daily routine scheme after informed consent about this prospective registry were included. For histological proven benign disease in any lesion patients had to adhere FU according radiological guidelines and further on by re-visits for at least 2 years after biopsy resulting into last visit in Feb 2022 without any drop-out. Present HRCT was mandatory to achieve one day before intervention. It had to be decided by the examiner mainly after analysis of the preset HRCT which of the 3 CBCT driven modalities were used for diagnostical approach: A) Pure endobronchial approach (CBCT, rEBUS, TBB), B) Pure transthoracical approach with a 21G core-biopsy needle (BIOPINCE needle) with CBCT only, or C) Combined approach as described below (CBCT, rEBUS, TTNA). As instruments were available common forceps and needles, EWC, curette and various RUFB (Olympus Company) mentioned in the materials section. A second CBCT was only allowed in the combined approach group to plan the 3D transthoracic approach in expiration whereas even a CBCT for tool-in-lesion control (TIL CBCT) was never allowed in all 3 groups. <b>Results:</b> In 100 lesions predefined modalities pure endobiopsy, pure TTNA and combined approaches were performed in 77, 9 and 14 lesions respectively without any pneumothorax or bleeding. In these 3 modalities we found confirmed (mostly specific) benign and malignant cases 47 and 30, 4 and 5, 2 and 12 respectively. Lesion sizes in the 3 different groups were (median, mean) 14 and 17,7mm (of those 41 invisible of 77 under XR (53%) in the pure endobiopsy group), 27 and 31mm (11% invisible under XR in the pure TTNA group), 18,5 and 23mm (35% invisible under XR in the combined group) respectively. In the 3 groups for the malignant cases 25 of 30, 5 of 5 and 12 of 12 were diagnosed correctly rendering a diagnostical yield of 42 in 47 malignant cases for the whole algorithm (89,4%) with sizes (mean, median) for the whole algorithm of 16 and 19,7mm respectively which is comparable to published data for robotic-assisted bronchoscopy yield. In regards to vessel sign analysis it has to be clearly stated that the significance level for outcome prediction is inferior to bronchus sign analysis. In multivariate analysis there was a clear tendency towards higher outcome prediction especially if a pulmonary artery branch leads into such target even when a bronchus sign is missing. For NY when comparing univariate analysis and partition model analysis at a set diameter of >11mm with significance (p=0,0052) the additional advantage of analysing a given vessel sign (especially pulmonary artery branches) seems to add on 19% of valuable outcome prediction. <b>Conclusion:</b> A nodule orientated approach in a manual CBCT-AF environment including typical instruments renders in experienced hands comparable results to robotic assisted bronchoscopy even without UTN bronchoscopes or other specialized, therefore expensive tools. In multivariate analysis only bronchus sign analysis revealed significant (p = 0,05) prediction of navigational yield outcome prediction whereas vessel sign analysis increases highly the odds ratio in favor of positive outcome prediction but without significance at the given level. In a partition model to erase outliers at a set iSPN diameter >11mm vessel sign analysis (especially pulmonary artery branches) renders a significant and ameliorated prediction of NY.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 7\",\"pages\":\"2124-2144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.109996\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.109996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作品简介:我们将CBCT应用作为一站式的结节定向方法,以增加DY,减少并发症发生率,减少手术时间和经济成本,并使用经典的外围仪器,包括微型冷冻探头(ERBE 1,1mm),rEBUS (Olympus)和标准RUFBs (Olympus公司),至少2mm工作通道和4.2 mm外径,用于诊断外周靶标(iSPNs),在对血管和支气管征象分类进行详细的介入前CT分析后,对所有患者进行前瞻性登记。材料和方法:从2017年6月到2019年11月,90名年龄在16岁至95岁之间的患者在知情同意后,在日常方案中接受支气管镜检查,有101个周围病变。对于组织学证实的任何病变的良性疾病,患者必须根据放射学指南坚持FU,并在活检后至少2年内再次就诊,直到2022年2月最后一次就诊,没有任何退出。目前HRCT必须在干预前一天完成。主要由检查者在对预先的HRCT进行分析后决定采用三种CBCT驱动模式中的哪一种进行诊断入路:A)纯支气管内入路(CBCT, rEBUS, TBB), B)纯经胸入路,使用21G核心活检针(BIOPINCE针),仅使用CBCT,或C)如下所述的联合入路(CBCT, rEBUS, TTNA)。由于仪器可用,常见的镊子和针头,EWC,刮管和材料部分提到的各种RUFB(奥林巴斯公司)。仅在联合入路组中允许进行第二次CBCT,以计划到期时的3D经胸入路,而在所有3组中甚至不允许进行病灶内工具控制(TIL CBCT)的CBCT。结果:在100例病变中,分别对77例、9例和14例病变进行了纯内活检、纯TTNA和联合入路,均未发生气胸或出血。在这三种方式中,我们分别发现确诊的(大多数是特异性的)良恶性病例47例和30例,4例和5例,2例和12例。3组病灶大小(中位数、平均值)分别为14、17.7 mm(纯内镜活检组77例中41例(53%)在XR下不可见)、27、31mm(纯TTNA组11%在XR下不可见)、18、5、23mm(联合组35%在XR下不可见)。在3组恶性病例中,30例中有25例,5例中有5例,12例中有12例被正确诊断,使得整个算法的47例恶性病例的诊断率为42例(89.4%),整个算法的大小(平均值,中位数)分别为16和19.7 mm,与已发表的机器人辅助支气管镜诊断率数据相当。关于血管征象分析,必须明确指出,结果预测的显著性水平低于支气管征象分析。在多变量分析中,明显倾向于更高的预后预测,特别是当肺动脉分支通向该目标时,即使没有支气管征象。对于NY来说,当比较单变量分析和分区模型分析在bbb10 - 11mm的设定直径具有显著性(p= 0.0052)时,分析给定血管体征(特别是肺动脉分支)的额外优势似乎增加了19%的有价值的结果预测。结论:即使没有UTN支气管镜或其他专业的昂贵工具,在包括典型仪器的手动CBCT-AF环境中进行结节定位的方法也能在经验丰富的人手中获得与机器人辅助支气管镜相当的结果。在多变量分析中,只有支气管征象分析能显著预测预后(p = 0.05),而血管征象分析能显著提高预后预测的优势比,但在给定水平下无显著性。在一组iSPN直径bbbb10 - 11mm的分区模型中,血管征象分析(尤其是肺动脉分支)对NY的预测有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vessel sign analysis paves the way to optimized CBCT application in interventional pulmonology: COMBINED algorithm as a one-stop-shop.

Introduction: We used CBCT application as one-stop-shop nodule orientated approach in regards to increase DY, reduce complication rate, reduce time on-table and economical costs with classical peripheral instruments including mini-cryoprobe (ERBE 1,1mm), rEBUS (Olympus) and standard RUFBs (Olympus Company) with at least 2mm working channel and 4,2mm outer diameter for the diagnosis of peripheral targets (iSPNs) in a prospective all-comers registry after detailed analysis of pre-interventional CT for vessel- and bronchus sign classes. Materials and Methods: From Jun 2017 until Nov 2019 in 90 all-comers patients between 16 and 95 years fit for bronchoscopy with 101 peripheral lesions in a daily routine scheme after informed consent about this prospective registry were included. For histological proven benign disease in any lesion patients had to adhere FU according radiological guidelines and further on by re-visits for at least 2 years after biopsy resulting into last visit in Feb 2022 without any drop-out. Present HRCT was mandatory to achieve one day before intervention. It had to be decided by the examiner mainly after analysis of the preset HRCT which of the 3 CBCT driven modalities were used for diagnostical approach: A) Pure endobronchial approach (CBCT, rEBUS, TBB), B) Pure transthoracical approach with a 21G core-biopsy needle (BIOPINCE needle) with CBCT only, or C) Combined approach as described below (CBCT, rEBUS, TTNA). As instruments were available common forceps and needles, EWC, curette and various RUFB (Olympus Company) mentioned in the materials section. A second CBCT was only allowed in the combined approach group to plan the 3D transthoracic approach in expiration whereas even a CBCT for tool-in-lesion control (TIL CBCT) was never allowed in all 3 groups. Results: In 100 lesions predefined modalities pure endobiopsy, pure TTNA and combined approaches were performed in 77, 9 and 14 lesions respectively without any pneumothorax or bleeding. In these 3 modalities we found confirmed (mostly specific) benign and malignant cases 47 and 30, 4 and 5, 2 and 12 respectively. Lesion sizes in the 3 different groups were (median, mean) 14 and 17,7mm (of those 41 invisible of 77 under XR (53%) in the pure endobiopsy group), 27 and 31mm (11% invisible under XR in the pure TTNA group), 18,5 and 23mm (35% invisible under XR in the combined group) respectively. In the 3 groups for the malignant cases 25 of 30, 5 of 5 and 12 of 12 were diagnosed correctly rendering a diagnostical yield of 42 in 47 malignant cases for the whole algorithm (89,4%) with sizes (mean, median) for the whole algorithm of 16 and 19,7mm respectively which is comparable to published data for robotic-assisted bronchoscopy yield. In regards to vessel sign analysis it has to be clearly stated that the significance level for outcome prediction is inferior to bronchus sign analysis. In multivariate analysis there was a clear tendency towards higher outcome prediction especially if a pulmonary artery branch leads into such target even when a bronchus sign is missing. For NY when comparing univariate analysis and partition model analysis at a set diameter of >11mm with significance (p=0,0052) the additional advantage of analysing a given vessel sign (especially pulmonary artery branches) seems to add on 19% of valuable outcome prediction. Conclusion: A nodule orientated approach in a manual CBCT-AF environment including typical instruments renders in experienced hands comparable results to robotic assisted bronchoscopy even without UTN bronchoscopes or other specialized, therefore expensive tools. In multivariate analysis only bronchus sign analysis revealed significant (p = 0,05) prediction of navigational yield outcome prediction whereas vessel sign analysis increases highly the odds ratio in favor of positive outcome prediction but without significance at the given level. In a partition model to erase outliers at a set iSPN diameter >11mm vessel sign analysis (especially pulmonary artery branches) renders a significant and ameliorated prediction of NY.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer
Journal of Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
333
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信