使用深度学习生成的CBCT轮廓用于前列腺SABR治疗的在线剂量评估。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Conor Sinclair Smith, Isabelle Gagne, Karl Otto, Carter Kolbeck, Joshua Giambattista, Abraham Alexander, Sonja Murchison, Andrew Pritchard, Erika Chin
{"title":"使用深度学习生成的CBCT轮廓用于前列腺SABR治疗的在线剂量评估。","authors":"Conor Sinclair Smith,&nbsp;Isabelle Gagne,&nbsp;Karl Otto,&nbsp;Carter Kolbeck,&nbsp;Joshua Giambattista,&nbsp;Abraham Alexander,&nbsp;Sonja Murchison,&nbsp;Andrew Pritchard,&nbsp;Erika Chin","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prostate Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) is an ultra-hypofractionated treatment where small setup errors can lead to higher doses to organs at risk (OARs). Although bowel and bladder preparation protocols reduce inter-fraction variability, inconsistent patient adherence still results in OAR variability. At many centers without online adaptive machines, radiation therapists use decision trees (DTs) to visually assess patient setup, yet their application varies. To evaluate our center's DTs, we employed deep learning-generated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) contours to estimate daily doses to the rectum and bladder, comparing these with planned dose-volume metrics to guide future personalized DT development. Two hundred pretreatment CBCT scans from 40 prostate SABR patients (each receiving 40 Gy in five fractions) were auto-contoured retrospectively, and daily rectum and bladder doses were estimated by overlaying the planned dose on the CBCT using online rigid registration data. Dose-volume metrics were classified as “no”, “minor”, or “major” violations based on meeting preferred or mandatory goals. Twenty-seven percent of fractions exhibited at least one major bladder violation (with an additional 34% minor), while 14% of fractions had a major rectum violation (10% minor). Across treatments, five patients had recurring bladder V37 Gy major violations and two had rectum V36 Gy major violations. Bowel and bladder preparation significantly influenced OAR position and volume, leading to unmet mandatory goals. Our retrospective analysis underscores the significant impact of patient preparation on dosimetric outcomes. Our findings highlight that DTs based solely on visual assessment miss dose metric violations due to human error; only 23 of 59 under-filled bladder fractions were flagged. In addition to the insensitivity of visual assessments, variability in DT application further compromises patient setup evaluation. These analyses confirm that reliance on visual inspection alone can overlook deviations, emphasizing the need for automated tools to ensure adherence to dosimetric constraints in prostate SABR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using deep learning generated CBCT contours for online dose assessment of prostate SABR treatments\",\"authors\":\"Conor Sinclair Smith,&nbsp;Isabelle Gagne,&nbsp;Karl Otto,&nbsp;Carter Kolbeck,&nbsp;Joshua Giambattista,&nbsp;Abraham Alexander,&nbsp;Sonja Murchison,&nbsp;Andrew Pritchard,&nbsp;Erika Chin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Prostate Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) is an ultra-hypofractionated treatment where small setup errors can lead to higher doses to organs at risk (OARs). Although bowel and bladder preparation protocols reduce inter-fraction variability, inconsistent patient adherence still results in OAR variability. At many centers without online adaptive machines, radiation therapists use decision trees (DTs) to visually assess patient setup, yet their application varies. To evaluate our center's DTs, we employed deep learning-generated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) contours to estimate daily doses to the rectum and bladder, comparing these with planned dose-volume metrics to guide future personalized DT development. Two hundred pretreatment CBCT scans from 40 prostate SABR patients (each receiving 40 Gy in five fractions) were auto-contoured retrospectively, and daily rectum and bladder doses were estimated by overlaying the planned dose on the CBCT using online rigid registration data. Dose-volume metrics were classified as “no”, “minor”, or “major” violations based on meeting preferred or mandatory goals. Twenty-seven percent of fractions exhibited at least one major bladder violation (with an additional 34% minor), while 14% of fractions had a major rectum violation (10% minor). Across treatments, five patients had recurring bladder V37 Gy major violations and two had rectum V36 Gy major violations. Bowel and bladder preparation significantly influenced OAR position and volume, leading to unmet mandatory goals. Our retrospective analysis underscores the significant impact of patient preparation on dosimetric outcomes. Our findings highlight that DTs based solely on visual assessment miss dose metric violations due to human error; only 23 of 59 under-filled bladder fractions were flagged. In addition to the insensitivity of visual assessments, variability in DT application further compromises patient setup evaluation. These analyses confirm that reliance on visual inspection alone can overlook deviations, emphasizing the need for automated tools to ensure adherence to dosimetric constraints in prostate SABR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70098\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70098\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺立体定向消融体放疗(SABR)是一种超低分割治疗,在这种治疗中,小的设置错误可能导致对危险器官(OARs)的高剂量放疗。尽管肠道和膀胱准备方案减少了分数间的可变性,但不一致的患者依从性仍然导致OAR的可变性。在许多没有在线自适应机器的中心,放射治疗师使用决策树(DTs)来直观地评估患者的设置,但它们的应用各不相同。为了评估我们中心的DT,我们使用深度学习生成的锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)轮廓来估计直肠和膀胱的每日剂量,并将其与计划剂量-体积指标进行比较,以指导未来的个性化DT发展。对来自40名前列腺SABR患者的200次预处理CBCT扫描(每个患者接受5次40 Gy的治疗)进行回顾性自动勾画,并通过使用在线刚性登记数据将计划剂量叠加在CBCT上来估计每日直肠和膀胱剂量。根据是否达到首选目标或强制性目标,剂量-体积指标被分为“无”、“轻微”或“严重”违规。27%的分数表现出至少一次严重的膀胱侵犯(另外34%轻微侵犯),而14%的分数表现出严重的直肠侵犯(10%轻微侵犯)。在治疗期间,5例患者复发膀胱V37 Gy严重违规,2例患者复发直肠V36 Gy严重违规。肠道和膀胱准备显著影响桨叶位置和体积,导致未达到强制性目标。我们的回顾性分析强调了患者准备对剂量学结果的重要影响。我们的研究结果强调,仅仅基于视觉评估的ct由于人为错误而错过了剂量计量违规;59个膀胱充血不足部分中只有23个被标记。除了视觉评估的不敏感性外,DT应用的可变性进一步损害了患者设置评估。这些分析证实,仅依靠视觉检查可能会忽略偏差,强调需要自动化工具来确保前列腺SABR符合剂量学限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using deep learning generated CBCT contours for online dose assessment of prostate SABR treatments

Using deep learning generated CBCT contours for online dose assessment of prostate SABR treatments

Prostate Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) is an ultra-hypofractionated treatment where small setup errors can lead to higher doses to organs at risk (OARs). Although bowel and bladder preparation protocols reduce inter-fraction variability, inconsistent patient adherence still results in OAR variability. At many centers without online adaptive machines, radiation therapists use decision trees (DTs) to visually assess patient setup, yet their application varies. To evaluate our center's DTs, we employed deep learning-generated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) contours to estimate daily doses to the rectum and bladder, comparing these with planned dose-volume metrics to guide future personalized DT development. Two hundred pretreatment CBCT scans from 40 prostate SABR patients (each receiving 40 Gy in five fractions) were auto-contoured retrospectively, and daily rectum and bladder doses were estimated by overlaying the planned dose on the CBCT using online rigid registration data. Dose-volume metrics were classified as “no”, “minor”, or “major” violations based on meeting preferred or mandatory goals. Twenty-seven percent of fractions exhibited at least one major bladder violation (with an additional 34% minor), while 14% of fractions had a major rectum violation (10% minor). Across treatments, five patients had recurring bladder V37 Gy major violations and two had rectum V36 Gy major violations. Bowel and bladder preparation significantly influenced OAR position and volume, leading to unmet mandatory goals. Our retrospective analysis underscores the significant impact of patient preparation on dosimetric outcomes. Our findings highlight that DTs based solely on visual assessment miss dose metric violations due to human error; only 23 of 59 under-filled bladder fractions were flagged. In addition to the insensitivity of visual assessments, variability in DT application further compromises patient setup evaluation. These analyses confirm that reliance on visual inspection alone can overlook deviations, emphasizing the need for automated tools to ensure adherence to dosimetric constraints in prostate SABR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信