不同动脉二氧化碳水平对猪颅窗模型脑血管自动调节曲线的影响。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1007/s12028-025-02250-z
Sofie Dietvorst, Bavo Kempen, Veerle De Sloovere, Nikky Corthout, Geert Meyfroidt, Bart Depreitere
{"title":"不同动脉二氧化碳水平对猪颅窗模型脑血管自动调节曲线的影响。","authors":"Sofie Dietvorst, Bavo Kempen, Veerle De Sloovere, Nikky Corthout, Geert Meyfroidt, Bart Depreitere","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02250-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) is the ability to maintain adequate cerebral blood flow (CBF) over a wide range of arterial blood pressures (ABPs). Carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) is a potent vasodilator, but its precise influence on CA remains incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A porcine cranial window model, in which CBF can be measured directly in the pial arterioles while ABP is mechanically manipulated, is used to investigate the effect of partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> in arterial blood (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) on CA capacity. Hypercapnia and hypocapnia were induced in 12 male piglets each by adjusting the respiratory rate. Once stable PaCO<sub>2</sub> levels of 60 and 25 mm Hg, respectively, were achieved, ABP was gradually increased in half of the animals or decreased in the other half beyond limits of CA by inflating a balloon in the aorta or inferior vena cava.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before ABP manipulation, hypercapnia already induced significant vasodilation (+ 33.9%) and an increase in CBF (+ 20.5%), whereas hypocapnia did not alter diameter or CBF. Both hypercapnia and hypocapnia significantly reduced the ability to adjust arteriolar diameters in response to changes in ABP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During hypocapnia as well as hypercapnia, narrowing of the CA range with a shorter plateau between the upper and lower limit of autoregulation was observed, compared to normocapnia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"541-550"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Different Arterial Carbon Dioxide Levels on the Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Curve in a Porcine Cranial Window Model.\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Dietvorst, Bavo Kempen, Veerle De Sloovere, Nikky Corthout, Geert Meyfroidt, Bart Depreitere\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02250-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) is the ability to maintain adequate cerebral blood flow (CBF) over a wide range of arterial blood pressures (ABPs). Carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) is a potent vasodilator, but its precise influence on CA remains incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A porcine cranial window model, in which CBF can be measured directly in the pial arterioles while ABP is mechanically manipulated, is used to investigate the effect of partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> in arterial blood (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) on CA capacity. Hypercapnia and hypocapnia were induced in 12 male piglets each by adjusting the respiratory rate. Once stable PaCO<sub>2</sub> levels of 60 and 25 mm Hg, respectively, were achieved, ABP was gradually increased in half of the animals or decreased in the other half beyond limits of CA by inflating a balloon in the aorta or inferior vena cava.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before ABP manipulation, hypercapnia already induced significant vasodilation (+ 33.9%) and an increase in CBF (+ 20.5%), whereas hypocapnia did not alter diameter or CBF. Both hypercapnia and hypocapnia significantly reduced the ability to adjust arteriolar diameters in response to changes in ABP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During hypocapnia as well as hypercapnia, narrowing of the CA range with a shorter plateau between the upper and lower limit of autoregulation was observed, compared to normocapnia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"541-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02250-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02250-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑血管自动调节(CA)是指在大范围动脉血压(ABPs)范围内维持足够的脑血流量(CBF)的能力。二氧化碳(CO2)是一种有效的血管扩张剂,但其对CA的确切影响尚不完全清楚。方法:采用猪脑窗模型,在机械操作ABP的同时,直接测量猪动脉小动脉CBF,研究动脉血CO2分压(PaCO2)对CA容量的影响。通过调节呼吸频率分别诱导12头公仔猪高碳酸血症和低碳酸血症。一旦PaCO2水平分别稳定在60和25毫米汞柱,一半动物的ABP逐渐升高,另一半动物的ABP逐渐降低,通过在主动脉或下腔静脉充气使其超过CA限制。结果:在ABP操作之前,高碳酸血症已经引起了明显的血管舒张(+ 33.9%)和CBF增加(+ 20.5%),而低碳酸血症没有改变直径或CBF。高碳酸血症和低碳酸血症均显著降低了调节动脉直径以响应abp变化的能力。结论:与正常碳酸血症相比,低碳酸血症和高碳酸血症期间,CA范围变窄,自动调节上限和下限之间的平台缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of Different Arterial Carbon Dioxide Levels on the Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Curve in a Porcine Cranial Window Model.

Background: Cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) is the ability to maintain adequate cerebral blood flow (CBF) over a wide range of arterial blood pressures (ABPs). Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a potent vasodilator, but its precise influence on CA remains incompletely understood.

Methods: A porcine cranial window model, in which CBF can be measured directly in the pial arterioles while ABP is mechanically manipulated, is used to investigate the effect of partial pressure of CO2 in arterial blood (PaCO2) on CA capacity. Hypercapnia and hypocapnia were induced in 12 male piglets each by adjusting the respiratory rate. Once stable PaCO2 levels of 60 and 25 mm Hg, respectively, were achieved, ABP was gradually increased in half of the animals or decreased in the other half beyond limits of CA by inflating a balloon in the aorta or inferior vena cava.

Results: Before ABP manipulation, hypercapnia already induced significant vasodilation (+ 33.9%) and an increase in CBF (+ 20.5%), whereas hypocapnia did not alter diameter or CBF. Both hypercapnia and hypocapnia significantly reduced the ability to adjust arteriolar diameters in response to changes in ABP.

Conclusions: During hypocapnia as well as hypercapnia, narrowing of the CA range with a shorter plateau between the upper and lower limit of autoregulation was observed, compared to normocapnia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信