台湾某三级医院足月儿眼科检查及视力筛检结果分析

Q3 Medicine
Nilüfer Zorlutuna Kaymak, Ayşin Tuba Kaplan, Sibel Öskan Yalçın, Raziye Dönmez Gün, Dilber Çelik Yaprak, Burak Tanyıldız
{"title":"台湾某三级医院足月儿眼科检查及视力筛检结果分析","authors":"Nilüfer Zorlutuna Kaymak, Ayşin Tuba Kaplan, Sibel Öskan Yalçın, Raziye Dönmez Gün, Dilber Çelik Yaprak, Burak Tanyıldız","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.07572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ophthalmic screening is an important part of the medical care of children as some eye abnormalities can lead to irreversible vision loss if not treated in the first few months or years of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the ophthalmic screening program in term infants aged ≤1 year who presented to a tertiary hospital in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The records of 1,035 infants ≤1 year old who underwent ophthalmic screening between November 2019 and February 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic and medical details, parental complaints about the infants' eyes, family history of ocular, adnexal, and systemic pathologies, light reactions, red reflex test results, eye movements, blink response to light, fixation and following, noticeable strabismus, conjunctivitis, epiphora, anterior segment and fundus pathologies, and treatments applied were recorded. The referring physician (family physician, pediatrician) and reason for reference were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Abnormal ophthalmological findings were detected in 136 infants (13.14%). The most common finding was congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (72.05%), followed by strabismus (8.82%), ptosis (4,41%), absence of following (3.67%), congenital cataract (2.94%), hemangioma of the adnexa (2.94%), nystagmus (2.94%), albino fundus (1.47%), preretinal hemorrhage (1.47%), and coloboma of the iris and choroid (1.47%). We detected abnormal red reflex in 4 infants who were not referred for red reflex abnormality by the referring physician, while another 4 infants referred for red reflex abnormality had no pathology on ocular examinations including the red reflex test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The importance of ophthalmic screening in infants is well appreciated but there are inadequacies in performing and interpreting the red reflex test among family physicians and pediatricians. Efforts should be directed at improving vision screening skills, especially red reflex testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"55 2","pages":"86-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Eye Examination and Vision Screening in Term Infants Presenting to a Tertiary Hospital in Türkiye.\",\"authors\":\"Nilüfer Zorlutuna Kaymak, Ayşin Tuba Kaplan, Sibel Öskan Yalçın, Raziye Dönmez Gün, Dilber Çelik Yaprak, Burak Tanyıldız\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.07572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ophthalmic screening is an important part of the medical care of children as some eye abnormalities can lead to irreversible vision loss if not treated in the first few months or years of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the ophthalmic screening program in term infants aged ≤1 year who presented to a tertiary hospital in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The records of 1,035 infants ≤1 year old who underwent ophthalmic screening between November 2019 and February 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic and medical details, parental complaints about the infants' eyes, family history of ocular, adnexal, and systemic pathologies, light reactions, red reflex test results, eye movements, blink response to light, fixation and following, noticeable strabismus, conjunctivitis, epiphora, anterior segment and fundus pathologies, and treatments applied were recorded. The referring physician (family physician, pediatrician) and reason for reference were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Abnormal ophthalmological findings were detected in 136 infants (13.14%). The most common finding was congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (72.05%), followed by strabismus (8.82%), ptosis (4,41%), absence of following (3.67%), congenital cataract (2.94%), hemangioma of the adnexa (2.94%), nystagmus (2.94%), albino fundus (1.47%), preretinal hemorrhage (1.47%), and coloboma of the iris and choroid (1.47%). We detected abnormal red reflex in 4 infants who were not referred for red reflex abnormality by the referring physician, while another 4 infants referred for red reflex abnormality had no pathology on ocular examinations including the red reflex test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The importance of ophthalmic screening in infants is well appreciated but there are inadequacies in performing and interpreting the red reflex test among family physicians and pediatricians. Efforts should be directed at improving vision screening skills, especially red reflex testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"86-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035013/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.07572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.07572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:眼科筛查是儿童医疗保健的重要组成部分,因为一些眼部异常如果在生命的最初几个月或几年内不进行治疗,可能导致不可逆转的视力丧失。本研究的目的是评估在 kiye三级医院就诊的≤1岁足月婴儿的眼科筛查方案的结果。材料与方法:回顾性分析2019年11月至2022年2月期间接受眼科筛查的1035名≤1岁婴儿的记录。记录人口统计和医疗细节、父母对婴儿眼睛的抱怨、眼部、附件和全身病变家族史、光反应、红色反射测试结果、眼球运动、对光的眨眼反应、注视和跟随、明显斜视、结膜炎、外显、前段和眼底病变以及应用的治疗方法。并注明转诊医师(家庭医师、儿科医师)及转诊原因。结果:136例患儿检出眼科异常,占13.14%。最常见的是先天性鼻泪管梗阻(72.05%),其次是斜视(8.82%)、上睑下垂(4.41%)、缺失(3.67%)、先天性白内障(2.94%)、附件血管瘤(2.94%)、眼球痉挛(2.94%)、白化眼底(1.47%)、视网膜前出血(1.47%)、虹膜和脉络膜结肠瘤(1.47%)。我们在4名未被转诊医师诊断为红色反射异常的婴儿中发现了红色反射异常,而另外4名转诊为红色反射异常的婴儿在包括红色反射试验在内的眼部检查中没有任何病理。结论:婴幼儿眼科筛查的重要性已得到充分认识,但家庭医生和儿科医生对红色反射试验的执行和解释存在不足。应努力提高视力筛查技能,特别是红色反射测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Eye Examination and Vision Screening in Term Infants Presenting to a Tertiary Hospital in Türkiye.

Objectives: Ophthalmic screening is an important part of the medical care of children as some eye abnormalities can lead to irreversible vision loss if not treated in the first few months or years of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the ophthalmic screening program in term infants aged ≤1 year who presented to a tertiary hospital in Türkiye.

Materials and methods: The records of 1,035 infants ≤1 year old who underwent ophthalmic screening between November 2019 and February 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic and medical details, parental complaints about the infants' eyes, family history of ocular, adnexal, and systemic pathologies, light reactions, red reflex test results, eye movements, blink response to light, fixation and following, noticeable strabismus, conjunctivitis, epiphora, anterior segment and fundus pathologies, and treatments applied were recorded. The referring physician (family physician, pediatrician) and reason for reference were also noted.

Results: Abnormal ophthalmological findings were detected in 136 infants (13.14%). The most common finding was congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (72.05%), followed by strabismus (8.82%), ptosis (4,41%), absence of following (3.67%), congenital cataract (2.94%), hemangioma of the adnexa (2.94%), nystagmus (2.94%), albino fundus (1.47%), preretinal hemorrhage (1.47%), and coloboma of the iris and choroid (1.47%). We detected abnormal red reflex in 4 infants who were not referred for red reflex abnormality by the referring physician, while another 4 infants referred for red reflex abnormality had no pathology on ocular examinations including the red reflex test.

Conclusion: The importance of ophthalmic screening in infants is well appreciated but there are inadequacies in performing and interpreting the red reflex test among family physicians and pediatricians. Efforts should be directed at improving vision screening skills, especially red reflex testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信