{"title":"胆道癌的基因组图谱及其靶向治疗策略。","authors":"Daisaku Yamada, Shogo Kobayashi, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02761-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are classified on the basis of their anatomical origin, and the feasibility of surgical resection depends on the tumor location and extent of progression. However, for unresectable BTCs, systemic therapy has been uniformly applied. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) therapy and GC-based therapies were established as the first-line standard BTC treatment. However, no highly effective second-line therapy has been established, and the prognosis remains poor, highlighting the need for further therapeutic advancements. Meanwhile, the era of precision medicine has expanded the use of genetic testing, leading to the identification of actionable molecular targets in BTC. Several targeted therapies, including FGFR inhibitors and IDH1 inhibitors, have been developed, offering new second-line treatment options and the potential for first-line use in appropriate cases. Notably, the frequency of these genetic alterations varies depending on the tumor location, demonstrating the molecular heterogeneity of BTC. Therefore, it has been recognized that a tailored treatment approach for each BTC patient may be more effective than uniform systemic therapy. Consequently, although routine genetic testing before initiating systemic treatment is currently limited by the medical environment (e.g., cost, accessibility, regional differences), it is recommended in ESMO guideline and might be increasingly advocated. However, BTC harbors a wide range of genetic alterations, and numerous targeted therapies are being developed accordingly. This review provides an overview of the reported genetic alterations in BTC, the frequencies of these alterations, and the corresponding targeted therapies, emphasizing the evolving role of precision medicine in BTC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1069-1079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer and corresponding targeted treatment strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Daisaku Yamada, Shogo Kobayashi, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02761-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are classified on the basis of their anatomical origin, and the feasibility of surgical resection depends on the tumor location and extent of progression. However, for unresectable BTCs, systemic therapy has been uniformly applied. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) therapy and GC-based therapies were established as the first-line standard BTC treatment. However, no highly effective second-line therapy has been established, and the prognosis remains poor, highlighting the need for further therapeutic advancements. Meanwhile, the era of precision medicine has expanded the use of genetic testing, leading to the identification of actionable molecular targets in BTC. Several targeted therapies, including FGFR inhibitors and IDH1 inhibitors, have been developed, offering new second-line treatment options and the potential for first-line use in appropriate cases. Notably, the frequency of these genetic alterations varies depending on the tumor location, demonstrating the molecular heterogeneity of BTC. Therefore, it has been recognized that a tailored treatment approach for each BTC patient may be more effective than uniform systemic therapy. Consequently, although routine genetic testing before initiating systemic treatment is currently limited by the medical environment (e.g., cost, accessibility, regional differences), it is recommended in ESMO guideline and might be increasingly advocated. However, BTC harbors a wide range of genetic alterations, and numerous targeted therapies are being developed accordingly. This review provides an overview of the reported genetic alterations in BTC, the frequencies of these alterations, and the corresponding targeted therapies, emphasizing the evolving role of precision medicine in BTC treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1069-1079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02761-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02761-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer and corresponding targeted treatment strategies.
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are classified on the basis of their anatomical origin, and the feasibility of surgical resection depends on the tumor location and extent of progression. However, for unresectable BTCs, systemic therapy has been uniformly applied. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) therapy and GC-based therapies were established as the first-line standard BTC treatment. However, no highly effective second-line therapy has been established, and the prognosis remains poor, highlighting the need for further therapeutic advancements. Meanwhile, the era of precision medicine has expanded the use of genetic testing, leading to the identification of actionable molecular targets in BTC. Several targeted therapies, including FGFR inhibitors and IDH1 inhibitors, have been developed, offering new second-line treatment options and the potential for first-line use in appropriate cases. Notably, the frequency of these genetic alterations varies depending on the tumor location, demonstrating the molecular heterogeneity of BTC. Therefore, it has been recognized that a tailored treatment approach for each BTC patient may be more effective than uniform systemic therapy. Consequently, although routine genetic testing before initiating systemic treatment is currently limited by the medical environment (e.g., cost, accessibility, regional differences), it is recommended in ESMO guideline and might be increasingly advocated. However, BTC harbors a wide range of genetic alterations, and numerous targeted therapies are being developed accordingly. This review provides an overview of the reported genetic alterations in BTC, the frequencies of these alterations, and the corresponding targeted therapies, emphasizing the evolving role of precision medicine in BTC treatment.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.