创伤性脑损伤的减压颅骨切除术:近期具有里程碑意义的试验综述。

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2025-001784
Purvi Pravinchandra Patel, Tanya Egodage, Matthew J Martin
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤的减压颅骨切除术:近期具有里程碑意义的试验综述。","authors":"Purvi Pravinchandra Patel, Tanya Egodage, Matthew J Martin","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of trauma-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with decompressive craniectomy (DC) serving as a critical surgical intervention. This article reviews the recent studies evaluating the role of DC in the management of elevated intracranial pressures (ICPs) associated with TBI and its impact on functional outcomes. Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury (DECRA), Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Uncontrollable Elevation of intracranial pressure (RESCUEicp), and Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for patients Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematoma (RESCUE-ASDH) are three landmark trials that used varying thresholds for surgical intervention after TBI and examined how functional outcomes improved with time. The DECRA trial evaluated early DC in patients with moderate ICP elevations, demonstrating reduced intensive care unit and hospital stays but poorer functional outcomes at 6 months. Conversely, the RESCUEicp trial emphasized the benefits of delayed DC as a rescue strategy for refractory ICP, showing reduced mortality and improved Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended scores at 24 months. The RESCUE-ASDH trial compared DC and craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma, finding no significant differences in functional outcomes but distinct profiles of surgical complications. Key recommendations emphasize individualized decision-making based on patient-specific factors, including preinjury functional status and family involvement. This comprehensive review underscores the importance of tailoring DC timing and techniques to optimize functional recovery and align with patient-centered goals, advancing the multidisciplinary management of severe TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 Suppl 1","pages":"e001784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: a review of recent landmark trials.\",\"authors\":\"Purvi Pravinchandra Patel, Tanya Egodage, Matthew J Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of trauma-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with decompressive craniectomy (DC) serving as a critical surgical intervention. This article reviews the recent studies evaluating the role of DC in the management of elevated intracranial pressures (ICPs) associated with TBI and its impact on functional outcomes. Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury (DECRA), Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Uncontrollable Elevation of intracranial pressure (RESCUEicp), and Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for patients Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematoma (RESCUE-ASDH) are three landmark trials that used varying thresholds for surgical intervention after TBI and examined how functional outcomes improved with time. The DECRA trial evaluated early DC in patients with moderate ICP elevations, demonstrating reduced intensive care unit and hospital stays but poorer functional outcomes at 6 months. Conversely, the RESCUEicp trial emphasized the benefits of delayed DC as a rescue strategy for refractory ICP, showing reduced mortality and improved Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended scores at 24 months. The RESCUE-ASDH trial compared DC and craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma, finding no significant differences in functional outcomes but distinct profiles of surgical complications. Key recommendations emphasize individualized decision-making based on patient-specific factors, including preinjury functional status and family involvement. This comprehensive review underscores the importance of tailoring DC timing and techniques to optimize functional recovery and align with patient-centered goals, advancing the multidisciplinary management of severe TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"volume\":\"10 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"e001784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010345/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-001784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-001784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是世界范围内创伤相关发病率和死亡率的主要原因,减压颅脑切除术(DC)是一种关键的手术干预措施。这篇文章回顾了最近的研究,评估了DC在TBI相关颅内压升高(icp)管理中的作用及其对功能结局的影响。弥漫性外伤性脑损伤减压颅骨切除术(DECRA),颅骨切除术治疗无法控制的颅内压升高的随机评估(RESCUEicp),以及急性硬膜下血肿清除患者颅骨切除术的随机评估(RESCUE-ASDH)是三个具有里程碑意义的试验,它们使用不同的阈值进行TBI后手术干预,并检查功能结局如何随着时间的推移而改善。DECRA试验评估了中度ICP升高患者的早期DC,显示重症监护病房和住院时间减少,但6个月时功能预后较差。相反,RESCUEicp试验强调延迟DC作为难治性ICP抢救策略的益处,显示出24个月时死亡率降低和格拉斯哥结局量表扩展评分提高。RESCUE-ASDH试验比较了DC和开颅术治疗急性硬膜下血肿,发现功能结局无显著差异,但手术并发症有明显差异。主要建议强调基于患者特定因素的个性化决策,包括损伤前功能状态和家庭参与。这篇综合综述强调了调整DC时间和技术以优化功能恢复并与患者为中心的目标保持一致的重要性,促进了严重TBI的多学科管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: a review of recent landmark trials.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of trauma-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with decompressive craniectomy (DC) serving as a critical surgical intervention. This article reviews the recent studies evaluating the role of DC in the management of elevated intracranial pressures (ICPs) associated with TBI and its impact on functional outcomes. Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury (DECRA), Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Uncontrollable Elevation of intracranial pressure (RESCUEicp), and Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for patients Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematoma (RESCUE-ASDH) are three landmark trials that used varying thresholds for surgical intervention after TBI and examined how functional outcomes improved with time. The DECRA trial evaluated early DC in patients with moderate ICP elevations, demonstrating reduced intensive care unit and hospital stays but poorer functional outcomes at 6 months. Conversely, the RESCUEicp trial emphasized the benefits of delayed DC as a rescue strategy for refractory ICP, showing reduced mortality and improved Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended scores at 24 months. The RESCUE-ASDH trial compared DC and craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma, finding no significant differences in functional outcomes but distinct profiles of surgical complications. Key recommendations emphasize individualized decision-making based on patient-specific factors, including preinjury functional status and family involvement. This comprehensive review underscores the importance of tailoring DC timing and techniques to optimize functional recovery and align with patient-centered goals, advancing the multidisciplinary management of severe TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信