受体3-肝静脉技术与移植物静脉成形术在左叶活体肝移植中最大化静脉流出。

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001778
Yuki Miyazaki, Masato Fujiki, Munkhbold Tuul, Mazhar Khalil, Alejandro Pita, Jaekeun Kim, Andrea Schlegel, Choon H D Kwon, Federico Aucejo, Antonio D Pinna, Charles Miller, Koji Hashimoto
{"title":"受体3-肝静脉技术与移植物静脉成形术在左叶活体肝移植中最大化静脉流出。","authors":"Yuki Miyazaki, Masato Fujiki, Munkhbold Tuul, Mazhar Khalil, Alejandro Pita, Jaekeun Kim, Andrea Schlegel, Choon H D Kwon, Federico Aucejo, Antonio D Pinna, Charles Miller, Koji Hashimoto","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Augmentation of hepatic venous outflow is crucial in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to maximize functional graft size and prevent venous complications. We present details of our outflow augmentation technique for left lobe grafts (LLG) in adult LDLTs, which uses all recipient 3 hepatic veins and venoplasty of graft left and middle hepatic veins. This study examines the effectiveness of our technique in preventing outflow complications and the correlation between anatomical variations of the graft hepatic veins and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients who underwent LLG-LDLT between 2012 and 2023. The patients were classified into 3 groups based on the graft hepatic vein anatomy and usage of venoplasty: group 1 (n = 10, common trunk without venoplasty), group 2 (n = 62, common trunk with venoplasty), and group 3 (n = 16, no common trunk with venoplasty).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No patient developed clinically significant venous outflow complications or graft loss related to venous outflow. There were no significant differences in complication rates or ascites production among the groups. Five-year graft survival was comparable among the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.43). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the model for end-stage liver disease score was the only independent risk factor for increased ascites after transplant (standardized beta, 0.546; <i>t</i> value,4.20; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.287-0.804), but anatomical variations of the graft hepatic veins did not influence ascites output.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recipient 3 hepatic vein outflow augmentation technique with graft venoplasty can be applied to various graft hepatic venous anatomy and effectively prevents outflow-related graft loss in LLG-LDLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 5","pages":"e1778"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recipient 3-Hepatic Vein Technique with Graft Venoplasty to Maximize Venous Outflow in Left Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Miyazaki, Masato Fujiki, Munkhbold Tuul, Mazhar Khalil, Alejandro Pita, Jaekeun Kim, Andrea Schlegel, Choon H D Kwon, Federico Aucejo, Antonio D Pinna, Charles Miller, Koji Hashimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Augmentation of hepatic venous outflow is crucial in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to maximize functional graft size and prevent venous complications. We present details of our outflow augmentation technique for left lobe grafts (LLG) in adult LDLTs, which uses all recipient 3 hepatic veins and venoplasty of graft left and middle hepatic veins. This study examines the effectiveness of our technique in preventing outflow complications and the correlation between anatomical variations of the graft hepatic veins and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients who underwent LLG-LDLT between 2012 and 2023. The patients were classified into 3 groups based on the graft hepatic vein anatomy and usage of venoplasty: group 1 (n = 10, common trunk without venoplasty), group 2 (n = 62, common trunk with venoplasty), and group 3 (n = 16, no common trunk with venoplasty).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No patient developed clinically significant venous outflow complications or graft loss related to venous outflow. There were no significant differences in complication rates or ascites production among the groups. Five-year graft survival was comparable among the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.43). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the model for end-stage liver disease score was the only independent risk factor for increased ascites after transplant (standardized beta, 0.546; <i>t</i> value,4.20; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.287-0.804), but anatomical variations of the graft hepatic veins did not influence ascites output.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recipient 3 hepatic vein outflow augmentation technique with graft venoplasty can be applied to various graft hepatic venous anatomy and effectively prevents outflow-related graft loss in LLG-LDLT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"e1778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在活体肝移植(LDLT)中,增加肝静脉流出量对于最大限度地扩大移植物的功能大小和预防静脉并发症至关重要。我们详细介绍了成人ldlt左叶移植物(LLG)的流出增强技术,该技术使用所有受体3肝静脉和移植物左和中肝静脉成形术。本研究探讨了我们的技术在预防流出并发症方面的有效性,以及移植物肝静脉解剖变异与手术结果之间的关系。方法:我们回顾性分析了2012年至2023年间88例接受LLG-LDLT治疗的患者。根据移植物肝静脉解剖及静脉成形术的使用情况,将患者分为3组:1组(10例,无静脉成形术),2组(62例,无静脉成形术),3组(16例,无静脉成形术)。结果:所有患者均未出现明显的静脉流出并发症或与静脉流出相关的移植物丢失。两组间并发症发生率和腹水产生量无显著差异。两组间5年移植物存活率比较(P = 0.43)。多元回归分析显示,终末期肝病评分模型是移植后腹水增加的唯一独立危险因素(标准化β, 0.546;t值4.20;结论:受体3肝静脉流出增强技术结合移植物静脉成形术可应用于各种移植物肝静脉解剖,可有效预防LLG-LDLT中流出性移植物损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recipient 3-Hepatic Vein Technique with Graft Venoplasty to Maximize Venous Outflow in Left Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Background: Augmentation of hepatic venous outflow is crucial in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to maximize functional graft size and prevent venous complications. We present details of our outflow augmentation technique for left lobe grafts (LLG) in adult LDLTs, which uses all recipient 3 hepatic veins and venoplasty of graft left and middle hepatic veins. This study examines the effectiveness of our technique in preventing outflow complications and the correlation between anatomical variations of the graft hepatic veins and surgical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients who underwent LLG-LDLT between 2012 and 2023. The patients were classified into 3 groups based on the graft hepatic vein anatomy and usage of venoplasty: group 1 (n = 10, common trunk without venoplasty), group 2 (n = 62, common trunk with venoplasty), and group 3 (n = 16, no common trunk with venoplasty).

Results: No patient developed clinically significant venous outflow complications or graft loss related to venous outflow. There were no significant differences in complication rates or ascites production among the groups. Five-year graft survival was comparable among the groups (P = 0.43). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the model for end-stage liver disease score was the only independent risk factor for increased ascites after transplant (standardized beta, 0.546; t value,4.20; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.287-0.804), but anatomical variations of the graft hepatic veins did not influence ascites output.

Conclusions: The recipient 3 hepatic vein outflow augmentation technique with graft venoplasty can be applied to various graft hepatic venous anatomy and effectively prevents outflow-related graft loss in LLG-LDLT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信